• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

影响家庭食物浪费行为因素的系统评价:应用计划行为理论

Systematic review of factors influencing household food waste behaviour: Applying the theory of planned behaviour.

作者信息

Etim Emma, Choedron Karma Tashi, Ajai Olawale, Duke Otu, Jijingi Hemen Emmanuel

机构信息

School of Geography, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.

School of Politics and International Relations, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, University of Nottingham Malaysia, Semenyih, Selangor, Malaysia.

出版信息

Waste Manag Res. 2024 Oct 9:734242X241285423. doi: 10.1177/0734242X241285423.

DOI:10.1177/0734242X241285423
PMID:39385555
Abstract

Globally, household food waste alone accounts for about $700 billion in environmental costs owing to the resources expended in producing discarded or uneaten food, along with social costs reaching approximately $900 billion. Reducing this waste by 25% could potentially feed 821 million chronically undernourished individuals. This systematic review examines household food waste behaviour using the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB). Comprehensive searches were conducted in PubMed and EMBASE using Elsevier supplemented by additional articles from the reference lists. The procedure followed the PRISMA flowchart. A descriptive analysis was conducted to summarize the characteristics of the 42 included studies from 17 countries. Significantly, 95% of these articles were published between 1 January 2010 and 19 April 2024, in Scimago Q1 ranked journals. The findings demonstrate an intersection of TPB components in explaining household food waste behaviour. This study suggests that a holistic strategy targeting attitudes, subjective norms and perceived behavioural control is essential for effectively reducing household food waste. Additionally, tailored interventions that consider demographic and socioeconomic factors are necessary to address the diverse needs of different populations. The study concludes that public education targeting mindful consumption, effective policies and community initiatives can significantly reduce food waste.

摘要

在全球范围内,仅家庭食物浪费一项,由于生产被丢弃或未食用食物所耗费的资源,就造成了约7000亿美元的环境成本,同时社会成本达到约9000亿美元。将这种浪费减少25%有可能养活8.21亿长期营养不良的人。本系统综述运用计划行为理论(TPB)研究家庭食物浪费行为。在PubMed和EMBASE中使用爱思唯尔进行全面检索,并辅以参考文献列表中的其他文章。该过程遵循PRISMA流程图。进行描述性分析以总结来自17个国家的42项纳入研究的特征。值得注意的是,这些文章中有95%发表于2010年1月1日至2024年4月19日之间,发表在Scimago Q1排名的期刊上。研究结果表明,TPB各组成部分在解释家庭食物浪费行为方面存在交叉。本研究表明,针对态度、主观规范和感知行为控制的整体策略对于有效减少家庭食物浪费至关重要。此外,考虑人口统计学和社会经济因素的量身定制干预措施对于满足不同人群的多样化需求是必要的。研究得出结论,针对有意识消费的公共教育、有效的政策和社区倡议可以显著减少食物浪费。

相似文献

1
Systematic review of factors influencing household food waste behaviour: Applying the theory of planned behaviour.影响家庭食物浪费行为因素的系统评价:应用计划行为理论
Waste Manag Res. 2024 Oct 9:734242X241285423. doi: 10.1177/0734242X241285423.
2
Nutritional interventions for survivors of childhood cancer.儿童癌症幸存者的营养干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 22;2016(8):CD009678. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009678.pub2.
3
A systematic review of country-specific drivers and barriers to household food waste reduction and prevention.一项针对特定国家减少和预防家庭食物浪费的驱动因素和障碍的系统评价。
Waste Manag Res. 2024 Jun;42(6):459-475. doi: 10.1177/0734242X231187559. Epub 2023 Aug 28.
4
Understanding factors influencing the implementation of medicine risk communications by healthcare professionals in clinical practice: a systematic review using the Theoretical Domains Framework.理解影响医疗保健专业人员在临床实践中实施医学风险沟通的因素:使用理论领域框架进行的系统评价。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2024 Feb;20(2):86-98. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2023.10.004. Epub 2023 Oct 18.
5
Interventions for promoting habitual exercise in people living with and beyond cancer.促进癌症患者及康复者进行习惯性锻炼的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 19;9(9):CD010192. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010192.pub3.
6
Personalised digital interventions for reducing hazardous and harmful alcohol consumption in community-dwelling populations.针对社区居住人群减少有害和危险饮酒行为的个性化数字干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 25;9(9):CD011479. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011479.pub2.
7
The effectiveness of interventions to meet family needs of critically ill patients in an adult intensive care unit: a systematic review update.成人重症监护病房中满足重症患者家庭需求的干预措施的有效性:系统评价更新
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Mar;14(3):181-234. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-2477.
8
Population-based interventions for reducing sexually transmitted infections, including HIV infection.基于人群的减少性传播感染(包括艾滋病毒感染)的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(2):CD001220. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001220.pub2.
9
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
10
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of computer and other electronic aids for smoking cessation: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.计算机和其他电子戒烟辅助手段的有效性和成本效益:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(38):1-205, iii-v. doi: 10.3310/hta16380.

引用本文的文献

1
Analysis of Waste Trends in the European Union (2021-2023): Sectorial Contributions, Regional Differences, and Socio-Economic Factors.欧盟废弃物趋势分析(2021 - 2023年):部门贡献、区域差异及社会经济因素
Foods. 2025 Mar 27;14(7):1172. doi: 10.3390/foods14071172.
2
Household Food Waste Reduction Determinants in Hungary: Towards Understanding Responsibility, Awareness, Norms, and Barriers.匈牙利家庭食物浪费减少的决定因素:迈向理解责任、意识、规范和障碍
Foods. 2025 Feb 21;14(5):728. doi: 10.3390/foods14050728.
3
Assumptions and perceptions of food wasting behavior and intention to reduce food waste in the case of Generation Y and Generation X.

本文引用的文献

1
Undertaking qualitative reviews in nursing and education - A method of thematic analysis for students and clinicians.护理与教育领域的质性综述——一种供学生和临床医生使用的主题分析法
Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2021 Jun 21;3:100036. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2021.100036. eCollection 2021 Nov.
2
Appraising systematic reviews: a comprehensive guide to ensuring validity and reliability.评估系统评价:确保有效性和可靠性的综合指南。
Front Res Metr Anal. 2023 Dec 21;8:1268045. doi: 10.3389/frma.2023.1268045. eCollection 2023.
3
Environmental impact of sewage sludge co-digestion with food waste and fat-oil-grease: Integrating plant-wide modeling with life cycle assessment approach.
Y 世代和 X 世代食物浪费行为的假设与认知以及减少食物浪费的意愿
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 23;15(1):2991. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-86252-z.
污水污泥与厨余和脂肪油协同消化的环境影响:全厂建模与生命周期评估方法的整合。
Bioresour Technol. 2024 Feb;394:130198. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2023.130198. Epub 2023 Dec 15.
4
Exploring Household Food Waste Reduction for Carbon Footprint Mitigation: A Case Study in Shanghai, China.探索减少家庭食物浪费以减轻碳足迹:中国上海的一个案例研究
Foods. 2023 Aug 25;12(17):3211. doi: 10.3390/foods12173211.
5
The management and prevention of food losses and waste in low- and middle-income countries: A mini-review in the Africa region.中低收入国家食物损失和浪费的管理与预防:非洲区域的小型综述。
Waste Manag Res. 2024 Apr;42(4):287-307. doi: 10.1177/0734242X231184444. Epub 2023 Aug 2.
6
Determinants of Household-Level Food Storage Practices and Outcomes on Food Safety and Security in Accra, Ghana.加纳阿克拉家庭层面粮食储存做法的决定因素及其对食品安全和保障的影响
Foods. 2022 Oct 19;11(20):3266. doi: 10.3390/foods11203266.
7
Why people are bad at leftover food management? A systematic literature review and a framework to analyze household leftover food waste generation behavior.为什么人们不擅长剩菜管理?一项系统文献综述和分析家庭剩菜浪费产生行为的框架。
Appetite. 2023 Jul 1;186:106577. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2023.106577. Epub 2023 Apr 28.
8
The Determinants of Food Insecurity Among Hispanic/Latinx Households With Young Children: A Narrative Review.《有幼儿的西班牙裔/拉丁裔家庭食物不安全的决定因素:一项叙事性综述》。
Adv Nutr. 2023 Jan;14(1):190-210. doi: 10.1016/j.advnut.2022.12.001. Epub 2022 Dec 24.
9
The problems with systematic reviews: a living systematic review.系统评价的问题:一项实时的系统评价。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2023 Apr;156:30-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.01.011. Epub 2023 Feb 14.
10
Has the COVID-19 pandemic changed food waste perception and behavior? Evidence from Italian consumers.新冠疫情是否改变了人们对食物浪费的认知和行为?来自意大利消费者的证据。
Socioecon Plann Sci. 2022 Aug;82:101095. doi: 10.1016/j.seps.2021.101095. Epub 2021 Jun 11.