Purssell Edward, Gould Dinah
Little Havens Children's Hospice, Daws Heath Rd, Benfleet, Essex, SS7 2LH, UK.
London, UK.
Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2021 Jun 21;3:100036. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2021.100036. eCollection 2021 Nov.
To develop a simplified but rigorous method for qualitative reviews using thematic analysis, suitable for students and clinicians.
Methodological review.
Cochrane and Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methods, key references from these, and important original methodologies.
Examining similarities and differences between methods, and how key features can be combined.
Features of the JBI method, meta-ethnography, meta-study, and thematic-analysis were combined. This results in a method that uses codes from the original paper that are combined into themes. Themes reflect patterns in the data, most notably similarity and differences between codes; but also a line of argument. Where codes and themes are nested, the relationship between them should be shown in a hierarchical tree. There is also explicit consideration of the methods, theory, and assumptions behind each of the included papers. The quality of the underlying studies, body of evidence, and confidence in findings should be assessed using the tools described; and these used to develop transparent findings.
This is one method by which systematic reviews can be undertaken by students and clinicians.
开发一种适用于学生和临床医生的、采用主题分析的简化但严谨的定性综述方法。
方法学综述。
Cochrane和乔安娜·布里格斯研究所(JBI)的方法、来自这些机构的关键参考文献以及重要的原始方法。
研究方法之间的异同,以及关键特征如何结合。
结合了JBI方法、元民族志、元研究和主题分析的特征。这产生了一种方法,该方法使用原始论文中的代码,并将其组合成主题。主题反映了数据中的模式,最显著的是代码之间的异同;还反映了一条论证思路。当代码和主题嵌套时,它们之间的关系应在层次树中显示。还明确考虑了每篇纳入论文背后的方法、理论和假设。应使用所描述的工具评估基础研究的质量、证据体和对结果的信心;并将这些用于得出透明的结果。
这是一种学生和临床医生可用于进行系统综述的方法。