Aliha M R M, Karimi Hamid Reza, Khedri Ehsan, Abdipour Sepehr V, Haghighatpour Pegah Jafari
Welding and Joining Research Center, School of Industrial Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology (IUST), Narmak, 16846-13114, Tehran, Iran.
School of Civil Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran.
Heliyon. 2024 Sep 19;10(19):e38145. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38145. eCollection 2024 Oct 15.
Cracking is a significant concern for pavements and should be appropriately treated during road, highway, and runway rehabilitation. This study investigates the behavior of asphaltic materials under tensile and shear loading modes in intact, fractured, and repaired conditions. With this aim, several methods and materials are utilized for repairs, such as poring adhesive into the crack (using bitumen, neat epoxy resin, and polymer concrete adhesives) and patching the crack with textile (by glass fiber and epoxy resin or bitumen). These tests were conducted at +10 °C, with a three-point bending loading configuration, the same as the actual loading configuration of pavements. Criteria such as failure load, failure work, and post-failure work, as well as failure patterns, were assessed to assess the effectiveness of repairs. Numerical analysis was also performed, and a constitutive model was presented. The ultimate tensile capacity of the cracked specimen is measured at 63 % lower than the intact condition (778 N). The ultimate tensile load of the bitumen-repaired specimen is higher than that of the cracked specimen, but it is still 11 % lower than that of the intact condition. The ultimate tensile capacity of epoxy resin repaired and polymer concrete repaired specimens are 88 % and 79 % higher than the intact specimen (about 1400 N). The ultimate tensile load of the fabric patch reinforced specimen that used bitumen as the adhesive is 38 % higher than the intact specimen (1075 N), while for the case of using the epoxy resin adhesive, this value is 258 % (2788 N). Observations of tensile failure patterns show that, because bitumen is viscoelastic, failure in bitumen-repaired specimens happens in bitumen necking mode and starts at the repaired crack tip. In other cases, the failure occurred far from the pre-crack plane.
裂缝是路面的一个重大问题,在道路、公路和跑道修复过程中应进行适当处理。本研究调查了完整、断裂和修复状态下沥青材料在拉伸和剪切加载模式下的行为。为此,采用了多种修复方法和材料,如向裂缝中灌注粘合剂(使用沥青、纯环氧树脂和聚合物混凝土粘合剂)以及用织物修补裂缝(使用玻璃纤维和环氧树脂或沥青)。这些试验在+10°C下进行,采用三点弯曲加载配置,与路面的实际加载配置相同。评估了诸如破坏荷载、破坏功和破坏后功等标准以及破坏模式,以评估修复效果。还进行了数值分析,并提出了一个本构模型。裂纹试件的极限抗拉能力比完整状态低63%(778N)。沥青修复试件的极限拉伸荷载高于裂纹试件,但仍比完整状态低11%。环氧树脂修复和聚合物混凝土修复试件的极限抗拉能力分别比完整试件高88%和79%(约1400N)。以沥青为粘合剂的织物补丁增强试件的极限拉伸荷载比完整试件高38%(1075N),而对于使用环氧树脂粘合剂的情况,该值为258%(2788N)。拉伸破坏模式的观察表明,由于沥青是粘弹性的,沥青修复试件的破坏以沥青颈缩模式发生,并从修复后的裂纹尖端开始。在其他情况下,破坏发生在远离预裂纹平面的位置。