Subramanian Atreya, Swaminathan Christie, Siby Jayas, Singh Anurag, Gulab Adil
Department of General Surgery, Aneurin Bevan University Health Board, Newport, GBR.
Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust, Brighton, GBR.
Cureus. 2024 Oct 8;16(10):e71089. doi: 10.7759/cureus.71089. eCollection 2024 Oct.
Objectives To present a single-center experience of laparoscopic management of acute small bowel obstruction (ASBO) based on seven years of data and demonstrate its suitability for the United Kingdom (UK). Methods A retrospective review of case notes to evaluate postoperative outcomes was conducted. All emergency small bowel obstructions treated laparoscopically were included. The cases that were converted to a laparotomy were excluded. Demographics (age, sex), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade, indication for surgery, duration of stay, complications, requirement of stoma, requirement of intensive treatment unit/high dependency unit (ITU/HDU), reoperation/readmissions, and 30-day mortality were noted. The results were tabulated and analyzed accordingly. Results There were 119 patients studied, with a median age of 66 (range: 17-97). The sex ratio was 62 females to 57 males. Primary etiologies of adhesion bands (49.5%, 59) and hernia (31.9%, 38) were the most common. Minor and major complications were 15 (12.6%) and 37 (31%), respectively. Three (2.5%) patients passed away within 30 days of surgery. The median length of stay (LOS) was eight days. The median LOS subgroup analysis showed nine days for adhesiolysis and six days for hernias. Discussion This study shows that there is significant heterogeneity in outcomes regarding small bowel obstruction around the world. We have demonstrated similar to better results in our center relative to other prominent centers in the UK. This can be attributed to the patient cohort, presentation, and physiological status on admission, delay to surgery, and associated co-morbidities to name a few. Conclusion This study indicates that laparoscopic surgery is a safe approach to treating ASBO, provided adequate expertise and infrastructure are available.
目的 基于七年的数据呈现急性小肠梗阻(ASBO)腹腔镜治疗的单中心经验,并证明其在英国的适用性。方法 对病例记录进行回顾性分析以评估术后结果。纳入所有接受腹腔镜治疗的急诊小肠梗阻病例。排除中转开腹的病例。记录人口统计学资料(年龄、性别)、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级、手术指征、住院时间、并发症、造口需求、重症监护病房/高依赖病房(ITU/HDU)需求、再次手术/再入院情况以及30天死亡率。将结果列表并进行相应分析。结果 共研究119例患者,中位年龄为66岁(范围:17 - 97岁)。男女比例为57例男性对62例女性。粘连束带(49.5%,59例)和疝(31.9%,38例)是最常见的主要病因。轻微和严重并发症分别为15例(12.6%)和37例(31%)。3例(2.5%)患者在术后30天内死亡。中位住院时间为8天。中位住院时间亚组分析显示,粘连松解术患者为9天,疝患者为6天。讨论 本研究表明,全球范围内小肠梗阻的治疗结果存在显著异质性。相对于英国其他知名中心,我们中心取得了相似或更好的结果。这可归因于患者群体、临床表现、入院时的生理状态、手术延迟以及相关合并症等诸多因素。结论 本研究表明,只要具备足够的专业知识和基础设施,腹腔镜手术是治疗ASBO的一种安全方法。