• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

技术对健康有益吗?调查私营部门的促进健康策略。

Can technology be good for health? Investigating health-promoting strategies in the private sector.

机构信息

Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.

Carey Business School, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2024 Sep 25;12:1395422. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1395422. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2024.1395422
PMID:39386955
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11461296/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

This research investigates what might motivate tech companies and impact-driven investors to adopt a health-promoting strategy in their product development and capital allocation strategies.

METHODS

Participants were recruited for semi-structured interviews through purposive and snowball sampling. From 83 outreach attempts, thematic saturation required 19 completed interviews out of the 46 consumer technology executives and impact-focused investors who responded. Interviews were analyzed using grounded theory-based content analysis.

RESULTS

Seven coding categories resulted from inductive coding, with 83 sub-codes. The primary themes were: product-based health impact is magnified when matched to user demographics (making an equity mindset important); stakeholders are eager for reliable health metrics, especially those that hold across industry verticals; when capturing health impact, it is critical to include positive (i.e., economically beneficial) externalities. These results allowed for the creation of a logic model with a recommended theory of change for the private sector to develop health strategy.

DISCUSSION

Intentional integration of impact strategy with business priorities will allow teams to design products that promote health, driving buy-in and resource allocation while attracting investment and double returns. For policymakers, it is clear that tech policy and regulation for corporate reporting need to keep pace. These findings are limited by the purposive recruitment of participants, introducing potential bias and risk to generalizability.

摘要

简介

本研究旨在探讨是什么促使科技公司和有影响力的投资者在产品开发和资本配置策略中采用促进健康的策略。

方法

通过有目的和滚雪球抽样的方式,招募参与者进行半结构式访谈。在 83 次外展尝试中,有 46 位消费者技术高管和关注影响力的投资者做出了回应,需要 19 次完成的访谈才能达到主题饱和。使用基于扎根理论的内容分析对访谈进行分析。

结果

通过归纳编码产生了 7 个编码类别,有 83 个子码。主要主题是:当用户人口统计学特征与产品的健康影响相匹配时(使股权思维变得重要),产品的健康影响会放大;利益相关者渴望可靠的健康指标,尤其是那些跨行业垂直领域的指标;在捕捉健康影响时,纳入积极的(即经济上有益)外部因素至关重要。这些结果为私营部门制定健康战略创建了一个逻辑模型,并提出了一个推荐的变革理论。

讨论

有针对性地将影响策略与业务重点相结合,将使团队能够设计出促进健康的产品,从而推动认同和资源分配,同时吸引投资并获得双重回报。对于政策制定者来说,很明显,需要跟上科技政策和企业报告的监管步伐。这些发现受到参与者有目的招募的限制,这引入了潜在的偏见和对普遍性的风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec4e/11461296/d8073944f713/fpubh-12-1395422-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec4e/11461296/fefe3e7ceecf/fpubh-12-1395422-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec4e/11461296/2cc40f06611b/fpubh-12-1395422-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec4e/11461296/d8073944f713/fpubh-12-1395422-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec4e/11461296/fefe3e7ceecf/fpubh-12-1395422-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec4e/11461296/2cc40f06611b/fpubh-12-1395422-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec4e/11461296/d8073944f713/fpubh-12-1395422-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Can technology be good for health? Investigating health-promoting strategies in the private sector.技术对健康有益吗?调查私营部门的促进健康策略。
Front Public Health. 2024 Sep 25;12:1395422. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1395422. eCollection 2024.
2
Hurdles in tissue engineering/regenerative medicine product commercialization: a pilot survey of governmental funding agencies and the financial industry.组织工程/再生医学产品商业化中的障碍:政府资助机构和金融行业的试点调查。
Tissue Eng Part A. 2012 Nov;18(21-22):2187-94. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2012.0186. Epub 2012 Sep 27.
3
Physical activity policies in Saudi Arabia and Oman: a qualitative study using stakeholder interviews.沙特阿拉伯和阿曼的身体活动政策:使用利益相关者访谈的定性研究。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Aug 19;22(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01192-w.
4
Gender and physician specialization and practice settings in Ecuador: a qualitative study.厄瓜多尔的性别、医生专业及执业环境:一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Nov 17;16(1):662. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1917-1.
5
Integrating nutrition and obesity prevention considerations into institutional investment decisions regarding food companies: Australian investment sector perspectives.将营养和肥胖预防考虑因素纳入机构对食品公司的投资决策:澳大利亚投资界的观点。
Global Health. 2022 Nov 8;18(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s12992-022-00885-7.
6
Patients as healthcare consumers in the public and private sectors: a qualitative study of acupuncture in the UK.患者作为公共和私营部门的医疗保健消费者:英国针灸的定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 May 27;11:129. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-129.
7
Exploratory qualitative study to understand the underlying motivations and strategies of the private for-profit healthcare sector in urban Bangladesh.探索性定性研究,以了解孟加拉国城市私营营利性医疗保健部门的潜在动机和策略。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 3;9(7):e026586. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026586.
8
Facilitators and barriers to participation of private sector health facilities in government-led schemes for maternity services in India: a qualitative study.印度私营部门医疗机构参与政府主导的孕产妇服务计划的促进因素与障碍:一项定性研究
BMJ Open. 2017 Jun 22;7(6):e017092. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017092.
9
Corporate America and community health: exploring the business case for investment.美国企业与社区健康:探寻投资的商业理由
J Occup Environ Med. 2015 May;57(5):493-500. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000000431.
10
Experts' perspectives on the application of public-private partnership policy in prevention of road traffic injuries.专家对公私伙伴关系政策在预防道路交通伤害中的应用的看法。
Chin J Traumatol. 2020 Jun;23(3):152-158. doi: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2020.03.001. Epub 2020 Apr 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Leveraging Mobile Technology for Public Health Promotion: A Multidisciplinary Perspective.利用移动技术促进公共卫生:多学科视角。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2023 Apr 3;44:131-150. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-060220-041643. Epub 2022 Dec 21.
2
Addressing the commercial determinants of health begins with clearer definition and measurement.解决健康的商业决定因素首先要进行更清晰的定义和衡量。
Glob Health Promot. 2020 Jun;27(2):3-5. doi: 10.1177/1757975920931249.
3
Association of Healthy Lifestyle With Years Lived Without Major Chronic Diseases.
健康生活方式与无重大慢性疾病年限的关联。
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 May 1;180(5):760-768. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.0618.
4
Bringing the commercial determinants of health out of the shadows: a review of how the commercial determinants are represented in conceptual frameworks.将健康的商业决定因素从阴影中带出来:对商业决定因素在概念框架中如何呈现的综述。
Eur J Public Health. 2020 Aug 1;30(4):660-664. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckz197.
5
The association between adolescent well-being and digital technology use.青少年福祉与数字技术使用之间的关系。
Nat Hum Behav. 2019 Feb;3(2):173-182. doi: 10.1038/s41562-018-0506-1. Epub 2019 Jan 14.
6
Behavioral Interventions Using Consumer Information Technology as Tools to Advance Health Equity.利用消费者信息技术的行为干预措施,促进健康公平。
Am J Public Health. 2019 Jan;109(S1):S79-S85. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304646.
7
Health as a Way of Doing Business.健康作为一种商业之道。
JAMA. 2019 Jan 1;321(1):33-34. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.18935.
8
Systems Thinking as a Framework for Analyzing Commercial Determinants of Health.系统思维作为分析商业健康决定因素的框架。
Milbank Q. 2018 Sep;96(3):472-498. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12339.
9
Banking for health: the role of financial sector actors in investing in global health.为健康储蓄:金融部门参与者在全球健康投资中的作用。
BMJ Glob Health. 2018 May 2;3(Suppl 1):e000597. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000597. eCollection 2018.
10
On the promotion of human flourishing.论人类繁荣的提升。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Aug 1;114(31):8148-8156. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1702996114. Epub 2017 Jul 13.