Wijffels Gene, Lees Angela M, Sullivan Megan L, Sammes Stephanie L, Li Yutao, Gaughan John B
CSIRO Agriculture and Food, St Lucia, QLD 4067, Australia.
School of Agriculture and Food Sustainability, Animal Science Group, The University of Queensland, Gatton, QLD 4343, Australia.
Transl Anim Sci. 2024 Sep 2;8:txae133. doi: 10.1093/tas/txae133. eCollection 2024.
Heat wave intensity, frequency, and duration are increasing in many regions of the world, including locations where highly productive livestock are raised. There are animal health and welfare, as well as economic impacts from these events. In this study, the physiological responses of grain-fed steers during a high heat load challenge through to recovery in climate-controlled rooms () were intensively evaluated. Two cohorts of 12 Black Angus steers (BW, 615.4 ± 40.1 kg) sequentially underwent a simulated heatwave event that consisted of 3 phases in the CCR: PreChallenge (5 d duration and temperature humidity index () range of 65 to 71), Challenge (7-d duration and THI 66 to 95 with diurnal cycling), and Recovery (5 d duration and THI 65 to 70). The Challenge period was modeled on a severe heat wave, characterized by 3 very hot days. Individual rumen temperature (, °C) was collected every 10 min, and respiration rate (, breaths per minute), panting score (), and water usage (L·steer·day) were obtained at multiple time points daily, by trained observers. Individual animal daily DMI was also determined. Morning (0700 hours) rectal temperature (, °C) was measured on days 3, 5, 7 to 13, 15, and 17. Not unexpectedly, RumT, RecT, RR, and PS rose during Challenge and fell rapidly as conditions eased. Conversely, DMI was reduced during Challenge. During the transition between PreChallenge and Challenge, there were abrupt increases in RumT, and RR. It was also very apparent that during Recovery the steers did not return to the baseline PreChallenge state. Compared to PreChallenge, Recovery was characterized by persistent lowered daily mean RumT (= 0.0010), RecT (= 0.0922), RR (= 0.0257), PS (≤ 0.0001), and DMI (≤ 0.0001). These results provide evidence that these steers have undergone an allostatic response in response to high heat load, and the new adjusted physiological state post-heat event may not be transient.
热浪的强度、频率和持续时间在世界许多地区都在增加,包括饲养高产牲畜的地区。这些事件会对动物健康和福利以及经济产生影响。在本研究中,对谷物饲养的阉牛在高热负荷挑战直至在气候控制室()中恢复期间的生理反应进行了深入评估。两组各12头黑安格斯阉牛(体重,615.4±40.1千克)依次经历了模拟热浪事件,该事件在气候控制室中包括三个阶段:挑战前(持续5天,温度湿度指数()范围为65至71)、挑战(持续7天,THI为66至95且有昼夜循环)和恢复(持续5天,THI为65至70)。挑战期以严重热浪为模型,其特征是有3个非常炎热的日子。每10分钟收集一次个体瘤胃温度(,°C),由训练有素的观察员在每天的多个时间点获取呼吸频率(,每分钟呼吸次数)、喘气评分()和用水量(升·头·天)。还确定了个体动物的每日干物质采食量。在第3、5、7至13、15和17天测量早晨(0700时)直肠温度(,°C)。不出所料,瘤胃温度、直肠温度、呼吸频率和喘气评分在挑战期间上升,随着条件缓解而迅速下降。相反,干物质采食量在挑战期间减少。在挑战前和挑战之间的过渡期间,瘤胃温度和呼吸频率急剧增加。同样非常明显的是,在恢复期间,阉牛没有恢复到挑战前的基线状态。与挑战前相比,恢复的特征是每日平均瘤胃温度(=0.0010)、直肠温度(=0.0922)、呼吸频率(=0.0257)、喘气评分(≤0.0001)和干物质采食量(≤0.0001)持续降低。这些结果提供了证据,表明这些阉牛对高热负荷产生了适应性反应,并且热事件后的新调整生理状态可能不是短暂的。