School of Agriculture and Food Sciences, Animal Science Group, The University of Queensland, Gatton, QLD, 4343, Australia.
FD McMaster Laboratory, CSIRO Agriculture and Food, Armidale, NSW, 2350, Australia.
Int J Biometeorol. 2019 Jul;63(7):939-947. doi: 10.1007/s00484-019-01706-0. Epub 2019 Mar 13.
This study was conducted to determine the relationship between rectal temperature (T) and rumen temperature (T) and to assess if T could be used as a proxy measure of core body temperature (T) in feedlot cattle. Eighty Angus steers (388.8 ± 2.1 kg) were orally administered with rumen temperature boluses. Rumen temperatures were recorded at 10-min intervals over 128 days from all 80 steers. To define the suitability of T as an estimation of T, T were obtained from all steers at 7-day intervals (n = 16). Eight feedlot pens were used where there were 10 steers per pen (162 m). Shade was available in each pen (1.8 m/animal; 90% solar block). Climatic data were recorded at 30-min intervals, including ambient temperature (T; °C); relative humidity (RH; %); wind speed (WS; m/s) and direction; solar radiation (SR; W/m); and black globe temperature (BGT; °C). Rainfall (mm) was recorded daily at 0900 h. From these data, temperature humidity index (THI), heat load index (HLI) and accumulated heat load (AHL) were calculated. Individual 10-min T data were converted to an individual hourly average. Pooled mean hourly T data from the 128-day data were used to establish the diurnal rhythm of T where the mean minimum (39.19 ± 0.01 °C) and mean maximum (40.04 ± 0.01 °C) were observed at 0800 h and 2000 h respectively. A partial correlation coefficient indicated that there were moderate to strong relationships between T and T using both real-time (r = 0.55; P < 0.001) and hourly mean (r = 0.51; P < 0.001) T data. The mean difference between T and T was small using both real-time (0.16 ± 0.02 °C) and hourly mean T (0.13 ± 0.02 °C) data. Data from this study supports the hypothesis that T can be used as an estimate of T, suggesting that T can be used to measure and quantify heat load in feedlot cattle.
本研究旨在确定直肠温度(T)和瘤胃温度(T)之间的关系,并评估 T 是否可以作为饲养场牛核心体温(T)的替代测量指标。80 头安格斯阉牛(388.8 ± 2.1kg)口服瘤胃温度丸。在 128 天内,每隔 10 分钟记录 80 头阉牛的瘤胃温度。为了确定 T 作为 T 估计值的适用性,每隔 7 天从所有阉牛中获得 T 值(n=16)。使用 8 个饲养场围栏,每个围栏中有 10 头阉牛(162m)。每个围栏都有遮荫(1.8m/动物;90%遮阳)。每隔 30 分钟记录气候数据,包括环境温度(T;°C);相对湿度(RH;%);风速(WS;m/s)和方向;太阳辐射(SR;W/m)和黑球温度(BGT;°C)。每天 0900 时记录降雨量(mm)。根据这些数据,计算温度湿度指数(THI)、热负荷指数(HLI)和累积热负荷(AHL)。将个体 10 分钟 T 数据转换为个体每小时平均值。使用 128 天数据的汇总平均每小时 T 数据建立 T 的昼夜节律,平均最低(39.19 ± 0.01°C)和平均最高(40.04 ± 0.01°C)分别在 0800 时和 2000 时观察到。偏相关系数表明,使用实时(r=0.55;P<0.001)和每小时平均(r=0.51;P<0.001)T 数据,T 与 T 之间存在中度至强关系。使用实时(0.16 ± 0.02°C)和每小时平均 T(0.13 ± 0.02°C)数据,T 与 T 之间的平均差异较小。本研究的数据支持 T 可作为 T 的估计值的假设,表明 T 可用于测量和量化饲养场牛的热负荷。