相似文献
1
Promotion and tenure for medical physicists should be based on article specific measures and not on journal impact factor.
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2024 Dec;25(12):e14537. doi: 10.1002/acm2.14537. Epub 2024 Oct 10.
2
Women's Experiences of Promotion and Tenure in Academic Medicine and Potential Implications for Gender Disparities in Career Advancement: A Qualitative Analysis.
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Sep 1;4(9):e2125843. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.25843.
3
Best practices in scholarly publishing for promotion or tenure: Avoiding predatory journals.
J Prof Nurs. 2023 Mar-Apr;45:60-63. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2023.01.002. Epub 2023 Feb 14.
4
The perceptions of medical physicists towards relevance and impact of artificial intelligence.
Phys Eng Sci Med. 2021 Sep;44(3):833-841. doi: 10.1007/s13246-021-01036-9. Epub 2021 Jul 20.
5
Does Academic Blogging Enhance Promotion and Tenure? A Survey of US and Canadian Medicine and Pediatric Department Chairs.
JMIR Med Educ. 2016 Jun 23;2(1):e10. doi: 10.2196/mededu.4867.
6
Future trends in the supply and demand for radiation oncology physicists.
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2010 Apr 12;11(2):3005. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v11i2.3005.
7
Standardizing the evaluation of scientific and academic performance in neurosurgery--critical review of the "h" index and its variants.
World Neurosurg. 2013 Nov;80(5):e85-90. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2012.01.052. Epub 2012 Jan 31.
8
Scientific citation indices are useful in evaluating medical physicists for promotion and tenure. For the proposition.
Med Phys. 2006 Jan;33(1):1-2. doi: 10.1118/1.2142597.
9
Women in medical physics: a preliminary analysis of workforce and research participation in Australia and New Zealand.
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med. 2016 Jun;39(2):525-32. doi: 10.1007/s13246-016-0428-z. Epub 2016 Feb 18.
10
Scientific citation indices are useful in evaluating medical physicists for promotion and tenure. Against the proposition.
Med Phys. 2006 Jan;33(1):2-3. doi: 10.1118/1.2142597.
本文引用的文献
1
China has a list of suspect journals and it's just been updated.
Nature. 2024 Mar;627(8003):252-253. doi: 10.1038/d41586-024-00629-0.
2
Gender and retention patterns among U.S. faculty.
Sci Adv. 2023 Oct 20;9(42):eadi2205. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adi2205.
3
Relationship between journal impact factor and the thoroughness and helpfulness of peer reviews.
PLoS Biol. 2023 Aug 29;21(8):e3002238. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002238. eCollection 2023 Aug.
4
Study results from journals with a higher impact factor are closer to "truth": a meta-epidemiological study.
Syst Rev. 2023 Jan 18;12(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02167-8.
5
Quantifying hierarchy and dynamics in US faculty hiring and retention.
Nature. 2022 Oct;610(7930):120-127. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05222-x. Epub 2022 Sep 21.
6
Citation counts and journal impact factors do not capture some indicators of research quality in the behavioural and brain sciences.
R Soc Open Sci. 2022 Aug 17;9(8):220334. doi: 10.1098/rsos.220334. eCollection 2022 Aug.
7
Time to publish? Turnaround times, acceptance rates, and impact factors of journals in fisheries science.
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 23;16(9):e0257841. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257841. eCollection 2021.
8
Gendered Citation Practices in the Field of Communication.
Ann Int Commun Assoc. 2021;45(2):134-153. doi: 10.1080/23808985.2021.1960180. Epub 2021 Jul 30.
9
Gender Disparity in Citations in High-Impact Journal Articles.
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jul 1;4(7):e2114509. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.14509.
10
Predatory journals: no definition, no defence.
Nature. 2019 Dec;576(7786):210-212. doi: 10.1038/d41586-019-03759-y.
Zotero 插件