• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国教职员工中的性别与留任模式。

Gender and retention patterns among U.S. faculty.

作者信息

Spoon Katie, LaBerge Nicholas, Wapman K Hunter, Zhang Sam, Morgan Allison C, Galesic Mirta, Fosdick Bailey K, Larremore Daniel B, Clauset Aaron

机构信息

Department of Computer Science, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA.

Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA.

出版信息

Sci Adv. 2023 Oct 20;9(42):eadi2205. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adi2205.

DOI:10.1126/sciadv.adi2205
PMID:37862417
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10588949/
Abstract

Women remain underrepresented among faculty in nearly all academic fields. Using a census of 245,270 tenure-track and tenured professors at United States-based PhD-granting departments, we show that women leave academia overall at higher rates than men at every career age, in large part because of strongly gendered attrition at lower-prestige institutions, in non-STEM fields, and among tenured faculty. A large-scale survey of the same faculty indicates that the reasons faculty leave are gendered, even for institutions, fields, and career ages in which retention rates are not. Women are more likely than men to feel pushed from their jobs and less likely to feel pulled toward better opportunities, and women leave or consider leaving because of workplace climate more often than work-life balance. These results quantify the systemic nature of gendered faculty retention; contextualize its relationship with career age, institutional prestige, and field; and highlight the importance of understanding the gendered reasons for attrition rather than focusing on rates alone.

摘要

在几乎所有学术领域中,女性在教员队伍中的占比仍然较低。通过对美国授予博士学位的院系中245,270名终身教职和已获终身教职的教授进行普查,我们发现,在每个职业年龄段,女性整体离开学术界的比例都高于男性,这在很大程度上是由于在声望较低的机构、非STEM领域以及终身教职教员中存在严重的性别差异导致的人员流失。对同一批教员进行的大规模调查表明,教员离职的原因存在性别差异,即使是在留存率没有性别差异的机构、领域和职业年龄段也是如此。女性比男性更有可能感觉是被工作所迫,而被更好机会吸引的可能性较小,并且女性因工作环境而离开或考虑离开的情况比因工作与生活平衡的情况更为频繁。这些结果量化了教员留用方面性别差异的系统性本质;将其与职业年龄、机构声望和领域的关系置于背景中;并强调了理解人员流失的性别化原因而非仅关注流失率的重要性。

相似文献

1
Gender and retention patterns among U.S. faculty.美国教职员工中的性别与留任模式。
Sci Adv. 2023 Oct 20;9(42):eadi2205. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adi2205.
2
Gendered hiring and attrition on the path to parity for academic faculty.性别化的招聘和人员流失对学术教职员工实现均等化的影响。
Elife. 2024 Jul 10;13:RP93755. doi: 10.7554/eLife.93755.
3
Gendered Impact of Caregiving Responsibilities on Tenure Track Faculty Parents' Professional Lives.照顾责任对终身教职员工父母职业生涯的性别化影响。
Sex Roles. 2022;87(9-10):498-514. doi: 10.1007/s11199-022-01324-y. Epub 2022 Nov 4.
4
Comparative analysis of gender disparity in academic positions based on U.S. region and STEM discipline.基于美国地区和 STEM 学科的学术职位性别差距的比较分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 20;19(3):e0298736. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298736. eCollection 2024.
5
Competing Risks Analysis of Promotion and Attrition in Academic Medicine: A National Study of U.S. Medical School Graduates.学术医学中的晋升和离职的竞争风险分析:一项对美国医学院毕业生的全国性研究。
Acad Med. 2019 Feb;94(2):227-236. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002441.
6
Academic Tenure: Perceptual Variations Among Tenured, Tenure-seeking and Non-tenure Faculty.学术终身教职:终身教职、寻求终身教职和非终身教职教师的感知差异。
J Prof Nurs. 2021 May-Jun;37(3):578-587. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2021.03.002. Epub 2021 Mar 5.
7
Factors Influencing Retirement Decisions of Senior Faculty at U.S. Medical Schools: Are There Gender-Based Differences?美国医学院资深教员退休决策的影响因素:是否存在基于性别的差异?
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2022 Jul;31(7):974-982. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2021.0536.
8
Faculty Retention at a School of Medicine, 2010-2022.2010 - 2022年医学院校教师留任情况
Chron Mentor Coach. 2023 Nov;7(SI16):388-393.
9
Multi-institutional study of women and underrepresented minority faculty members in academic pharmacy.多机构学术药学领域女性和代表性不足少数族裔教职员工的研究。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2012 Feb 10;76(1):7. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7617.
10
Tenure track in emergency medicine.急诊医学终身教职岗位。
Ann Emerg Med. 1997 Nov;30(5):622-5. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(97)70080-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Forward steps, lingering gaps: gender representation among distinguished speakers at professional conferences.前进的步伐,尚存的差距:专业会议知名演讲者中的性别代表性
Bioscience. 2025 Jun 30;75(9):737-746. doi: 10.1093/biosci/biaf063. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
Perceptions of fairness, inclusion and safety: the differential impact of contrasting experiences on academics and professional services staff.对公平、包容和安全的认知:不同经历对学术人员和专业服务人员的差异化影响。
J Manag Gov. 2025;29(3):815-847. doi: 10.1007/s10997-024-09721-z. Epub 2024 Oct 12.
3
Unpacking gender discrepancies in academic promotion across STEM fields in Mexico.

本文引用的文献

1
Name-based demographic inference and the unequal distribution of misrecognition.基于姓名的人口统计推断与错误识别的不平等分布。
Nat Hum Behav. 2023 Jul;7(7):1084-1095. doi: 10.1038/s41562-023-01587-9. Epub 2023 Apr 17.
2
Labor advantages drive the greater productivity of faculty at elite universities.劳动力优势推动了精英大学教师更高的生产力。
Sci Adv. 2022 Nov 16;8(46):eabq7056. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abq7056. Epub 2022 Nov 18.
3
Quantifying hierarchy and dynamics in US faculty hiring and retention.量化美国教职员工招聘和留用中的层次结构和动态。
剖析墨西哥STEM领域学术晋升中的性别差异。
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 14;20(8):e0324464. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324464. eCollection 2025.
4
Boosting scientific community values: The impact of social inclusion interventions on biomedical instructors.提升科学界价值观:社会包容干预对生物医学教师的影响
J Clin Transl Sci. 2025 Apr 28;9(1):e105. doi: 10.1017/cts.2025.81. eCollection 2025.
5
Composing authorship teams for health equity: an introduction to the health equity research production model.组建促进健康公平的作者团队:健康公平研究产出模式介绍
Int J Equity Health. 2025 Jun 12;24(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s12939-025-02524-0.
6
From dialogue to action: Assessing best practices and actionable steps for oral health professions education clinical and learning environments.从对话到行动:评估口腔健康专业教育临床与学习环境的最佳实践及可行步骤。
J Dent Educ. 2025 May;89(5):787-797. doi: 10.1002/jdd.13745.
7
Gender and racial diversity socialization in science.科学领域中的性别与种族多样性社会化
Nat Comput Sci. 2025 Jun;5(6):481-491. doi: 10.1038/s43588-025-00795-9. Epub 2025 Apr 17.
8
Experiences and perceptions of sexism in dementia research careers: A global cross-sectional survey.痴呆症研究职业中性别歧视的经历与认知:一项全球横断面调查。
Alzheimers Dement. 2025 Apr;21(4):e70123. doi: 10.1002/alz.70123.
9
Improving gender equity in academia depends on the workplace environment.提高学术界的性别平等取决于工作场所环境。
Elife. 2025 Apr 7;14:e105352. doi: 10.7554/eLife.105352.
10
Trends and influences in women authorship in randomised controlled trials in rheumatology: a comprehensive analysis of all published RCTs from 2009 to 2023.风湿病学随机对照试验中女性作者的趋势与影响:对2009年至2023年所有已发表随机对照试验的综合分析
RMD Open. 2025 Mar 27;11(1):e005341. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2024-005341.
Nature. 2022 Oct;610(7930):120-127. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05222-x. Epub 2022 Sep 21.
4
Socioeconomic roots of academic faculty.学术人员的社会经济根源。
Nat Hum Behav. 2022 Dec;6(12):1625-1633. doi: 10.1038/s41562-022-01425-4. Epub 2022 Aug 29.
5
Untangling the network effects of productivity and prominence among scientists.解析科学家生产力和知名度的网络效应。
Nat Commun. 2022 Aug 20;13(1):4907. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-32604-6.
6
Intersectional inequalities in science.科学中的交叉不平等现象。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Jan 11;119(2). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2113067119.
7
The unequal impact of parenthood in academia.为人父母对学术界的不平等影响。
Sci Adv. 2021 Feb 24;7(9). doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abd1996. Print 2021 Feb.
8
Burnout and attrition: Expanding the gender gap in neurology? burnout 和 attrition:扩大神经科的性别差距?
Neurology. 2019 Dec 3;93(23):1002-1008. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000008583. Epub 2019 Nov 5.
9
Productivity, prominence, and the effects of academic environment.生产力、知名度和学术环境的影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 May 28;116(22):10729-10733. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1817431116. Epub 2019 Apr 29.
10
The changing career trajectories of new parents in STEM.新父母在 STEM 领域职业轨迹的变化。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Mar 5;116(10):4182-4187. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1810862116. Epub 2019 Feb 19.