Dinesen Caroline, Vistisen Simon Tilma, Juhl-Olsen Peter
Department of Cardiothoracic- and Vascular Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Anesthesia Section, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, Aarhus N, 8200, Denmark.
Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 11, Aarhus N, 8200, Denmark.
J Clin Monit Comput. 2025 Apr;39(2):365-369. doi: 10.1007/s10877-024-01230-6. Epub 2024 Oct 10.
To systematically evaluate the effect of small changes in transducer position on key hemodynamic variables including CO generated by 4th generation FloTrac software. After cardiac surgery, cardiac output, mean arterial pressure, systemic vascular resistance, and stroke volume variation were measured with 4 generation Flotrac software. The transducer position was randomly placed at the midaxillary plane, 4 cm higher than the midaxillary plane or 4 cm lower than the midaxillary plane. Averages of three measurements were used. Data was available from 20 patients. Cardiac output increased from 4.59 L/min (± 0.92) to 4.78 L/min (± 0.99) with the transducer position at the midaxillary plane to 4 cm higher than the midaxillary plane, and cardiac output decreased to 4.43 L/min (± 0.90) with the transducer 4 cm lower than midaxillary plane (P < 0.001). On the relative scale, CO increased 4.1% (95% CI 3.1-5.0) when comparing the higher transducer level with the midaxillary plane position, and CO decreased 3.4% (95% CI 2.4-4.4) when comparing the midaxillary plane position with the lower transducer level, correspondiong to changes in CO of ≈ 1% per 1 cm change in transducer position. Mean arterial pressure and systemic vascular resistance both changed significantly with transducer position (both P < 0.001), whereas no statistically or clinically significant effect was seen on stroke volume variation (P = 0.98). A four-centimeter change in vertical transducer position induced clinically significant changes in cardiac output measurements by 4th generation FloTrac software. Definitions of optimal cardiac output in goal-directed therapy algorithms require meticulous transducer adjustment and can only be used in the reference patient position.
系统评估传感器位置的微小变化对关键血流动力学变量的影响,包括第四代FloTrac软件生成的心输出量(CO)。心脏手术后,使用第四代FloTrac软件测量心输出量、平均动脉压、全身血管阻力和每搏量变异。传感器位置随机置于腋中线平面、高于腋中线平面4厘米处或低于腋中线平面4厘米处。采用三次测量的平均值。有来自20名患者的数据。当传感器位置从腋中线平面升高至高于腋中线平面4厘米时,心输出量从4.59升/分钟(±0.92)增加至4.78升/分钟(±0.99),而当传感器位置低于腋中线平面4厘米时,心输出量降至4.43升/分钟(±0.90)(P<0.001)。在相对尺度上,将较高传感器水平与腋中线平面位置相比时,CO增加4.1%(95%CI 3.1 - 5.0),而将腋中线平面位置与较低传感器水平相比时,CO降低3.4%(95%CI 2.4 - 4.4),相当于传感器位置每变化1厘米,CO变化约1%。平均动脉压和全身血管阻力均随传感器位置发生显著变化(均P<0.001),而每搏量变异未见统计学或临床显著影响(P = 0.98)。传感器垂直位置4厘米的变化会导致第四代FloTrac软件测量的心输出量出现临床显著变化。目标导向治疗算法中最佳心输出量的定义需要精确调整传感器,且仅能在参考患者位置使用。