Faerber Jennifer A, Kawut Steven M, Hadjiliadis Denis, Hong Gina
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and.
Department of Medicine and.
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2025 Feb;22(2):193-199. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202312-1070OC.
The pathogenicity of in the cystic fibrosis (CF) airway is debated, leading to unclear clinical benefit of antifungal therapy for infection. To determine the real-world effectiveness of antifungal use in people with CF (PwCF) with species in the United States. We conducted a retrospective cohort study evaluating the association of antifungal use and respiratory outcomes in PwCF and -positive cultures using the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry. Marginal structural models using inverse-probability treatment weighted estimators were used to test whether antifungal exposure was associated with forced expiratory volume in 1 second percent predicted (FEVpp) and pulmonary exacerbation rate while controlling for fixed and time-varying confounders. We conducted sensitivity analyses on individuals with persistent and without concomitant allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA). A total of 14,754 individuals with -positive cultures between 2006 and 2019 were identified. Antifungals were prescribed to 3,575 (24.2%) unique PwCF during the study period. Antifungal use was not associated with FEVpp (adjusted estimate = -0.96 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI] = -2.21, 0.29). Antifungal use was associated with 29% increased rate of pulmonary exacerbations requiring intravenous (i.v.) antibiotics (adjusted incidence rate ratio = 1.29, 95% CI = 1.22, 1.37). In sensitivity analyses limited to individuals without ABPA, antifungals were associated with 1.88 lower FEVpp (95% CI = -3.35, -0.41) and an increased rate of pulmonary exacerbations (adjusted incidence rate ratio = 1.30; 95% CI = 1.21, 1.40), whereas in patients with persistent and persistent without concomitant ABPA, antifungals were not associated with FEVpp. Antifungal therapy in PwCF and -positive cultures was not associated with improvements in FEVpp, suggesting no observed benefit. Although antifungal therapy was associated with increased risk for pulmonary exacerbations, this could reflect confounding by severity of disease. Randomized clinical trials examining the clinical efficacy of antifungals in infections in CF are warranted.
曲霉在囊性纤维化(CF)气道中的致病性存在争议,这导致抗真菌治疗对曲霉感染的临床益处尚不明确。为了确定在美国患有曲霉属感染的CF患者(PwCF)中使用抗真菌药物的实际效果。我们进行了一项回顾性队列研究,使用囊性纤维化基金会患者登记处的数据评估PwCF中抗真菌药物的使用与呼吸道结局以及曲霉阳性培养之间的关联。使用逆概率治疗加权估计器的边际结构模型用于检验在控制固定和随时间变化的混杂因素的同时,抗真菌药物暴露是否与预测的1秒用力呼气量百分比(FEVpp)和肺部加重率相关。我们对持续感染曲霉且无合并变应性支气管肺曲霉病(ABPA)的个体进行了敏感性分析。在2006年至2019年期间共识别出14,754例曲霉阳性培养的个体。在研究期间,3,575例(24.2%)不同的PwCF患者接受了抗真菌药物治疗。抗真菌药物的使用与FEVpp无关(调整后的估计值=-0.96个百分点;95%置信区间[CI]=-2.21, 0.29)。抗真菌药物的使用与需要静脉注射(i.v.)抗生素的肺部加重率增加29%相关(调整后的发病率比=1.29, 95% CI=1.22, 1.37)。在仅限于无ABPA个体的敏感性分析中,抗真菌药物与FEVpp降低1.88相关(95% CI=-3.35, -0.41)以及肺部加重率增加(调整后的发病率比=1.30;95% CI=1.21, 1.40),而在持续感染曲霉且无合并ABPA的患者中,抗真菌药物与FEVpp无关。PwCF和曲霉阳性培养患者的抗真菌治疗与FEVpp的改善无关,表明未观察到益处。尽管抗真菌治疗与肺部加重风险增加相关,但这可能反映了疾病严重程度的混杂因素。有必要进行随机临床试验来检验抗真菌药物在CF患者曲霉感染中的临床疗效。