Mozafari Sogol, Yang Alan, Talaei-Khoei Jason
Department of Information Systems, College of Business, University of Nevada, Reno, Reno, NV, United States.
Interact J Med Res. 2024 Oct 10;13:e52287. doi: 10.2196/52287.
Health locus of control (HLOC) is a theory that describes how individuals perceive different forces that influence their lives. The concept of a locus of control can affect an individual's likelihood to commit to behaviors related to their health. This study explores the literature on the relationships between HLOC and medical behavioral interventions.
This study aims to better understand how HLOC constructs can potentially affect patient responses to health behavioral interventions and to propose a series of guidelines for individuals interested in designing medical behavioral interventions related to HLOC.
We used the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) methodology and performed an analysis of 50 papers related to the topic of HLOC and medical behavioral interventions. Inclusion criteria were studies that had a behavioral intervention involving patients and contained a metric of at least 1 of the constructs related to HLOC. The initial screening and search were conducted by 2 researchers (AY and SM) separately. The results were then combined and compared.
Our findings explore the influence of different levels of HLOC along with the importance of both patient- and health-related context when assessing the relationships between HLOC constructs and the likelihood of health behavior change. The findings show that different constructs related to HLOC can act as reliable predictors for patient responses to medical behavioral interventions. Patients who score higher on internal HLOC measures are more likely to exhibit behaviors that are consistent with positive health outcomes. Patients who score higher on chance HLOC are more likely to exhibit behaviors that may lead to adverse health outcomes. These conclusions are supported by most of the 50 studies surveyed.
We propose guidelines for individuals designing medical behavioral interventions so that they can make use of these relationships linked to HLOC. The three guidelines suggested are as follows: (1) in most situations, improving internal HLOC will improve health outcomes for patients; (2) patients with high external HLOC should be further studied to determine the source of the external HLOC; and (3) patients with a high chance HLOC are less likely to follow preventative behaviors or be responsive to interventions. Limitations of the study are that the primary search and analysis were conducted by 2 principal researchers (AY and SM). Interpretation and development of the guidelines are subject to individual interpretation of results and may not be applicable to all contexts.
健康控制点(HLOC)是一种描述个体如何感知影响其生活的不同力量的理论。控制点的概念会影响个体采取与自身健康相关行为的可能性。本研究探讨了关于健康控制点与医学行为干预之间关系的文献。
本研究旨在更好地理解健康控制点结构如何潜在地影响患者对健康行为干预的反应,并为有兴趣设计与健康控制点相关的医学行为干预的个人提出一系列指导方针。
我们采用PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目)方法,对50篇与健康控制点和医学行为干预主题相关的论文进行了分析。纳入标准是那些有涉及患者的行为干预且包含至少一项与健康控制点相关结构指标的研究。最初的筛选和检索由两名研究人员(AY和SM)分别进行。然后将结果合并并比较。
我们的研究结果探讨了不同水平的健康控制点的影响,以及在评估健康控制点结构与健康行为改变可能性之间的关系时患者和健康相关背景的重要性。研究结果表明,与健康控制点相关的不同结构可以作为患者对医学行为干预反应的可靠预测指标。在内部健康控制点测量中得分较高的患者更有可能表现出与积极健康结果一致的行为。在机遇健康控制点上得分较高的患者更有可能表现出可能导致不良健康结果的行为。这些结论得到了所调查的50项研究中的大多数的支持。
我们为设计医学行为干预的个人提出指导方针,以便他们能够利用这些与健康控制点相关的关系。建议的三项指导方针如下:(1)在大多数情况下,改善内部健康控制点将改善患者的健康结果;(2)应进一步研究具有高外部健康控制点的患者,以确定外部健康控制点的来源;(3)具有高机遇健康控制点的患者不太可能遵循预防行为或对干预有反应。本研究的局限性在于主要的检索和分析由两名主要研究人员(AY和SM)进行。指导方针的解释和制定取决于对结果的个人解读,可能不适用于所有情况。