• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人工智能在癌症成像优化中的应用:用户体验研究。

Artificial Intelligence for Optimizing Cancer Imaging: User Experience Study.

机构信息

Pharmacy Department, Faculty of Health, Science, Social Care and Education, Kingston University London, Kingston Upon Thames, United Kingdom.

Department of Nursing, Cyprus University of Technology, Limassol, Cyprus.

出版信息

JMIR Cancer. 2024 Oct 10;10:e52639. doi: 10.2196/52639.

DOI:10.2196/52639
PMID:39388693
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11502975/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The need for increased clinical efficacy and efficiency has been the main force in developing artificial intelligence (AI) tools in medical imaging. The INCISIVE project is a European Union-funded initiative aiming to revolutionize cancer imaging methods using AI technology. It seeks to address limitations in imaging techniques by developing an AI-based toolbox that improves accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, interpretability, and cost-effectiveness.

OBJECTIVE

To ensure the successful implementation of the INCISIVE AI service, a study was conducted to understand the needs, challenges, and expectations of health care professionals (HCPs) regarding the proposed toolbox and any potential implementation barriers.

METHODS

A mixed methods study consisting of 2 phases was conducted. Phase 1 involved user experience (UX) design workshops with users of the INCISIVE AI toolbox. Phase 2 involved a Delphi study conducted through a series of sequential questionnaires. To recruit, a purposive sampling strategy based on the project's consortium network was used. In total, 16 HCPs from Serbia, Italy, Greece, Cyprus, Spain, and the United Kingdom participated in the UX design workshops and 12 completed the Delphi study. Descriptive statistics were performed using SPSS (IBM Corp), enabling the calculation of mean rank scores of the Delphi study's lists. The qualitative data collected via the UX design workshops was analyzed using NVivo (version 12; Lumivero) software.

RESULTS

The workshops facilitated brainstorming and identification of the INCISIVE AI toolbox's desired features and implementation barriers. Subsequently, the Delphi study was instrumental in ranking these features, showing a strong consensus among HCPs (W=0.741, P<.001). Additionally, this study also identified implementation barriers, revealing a strong consensus among HCPs (W=0.705, P<.001). Key findings indicated that the INCISIVE AI toolbox could assist in areas such as misdiagnosis, overdiagnosis, delays in diagnosis, detection of minor lesions, decision-making in disagreement, treatment allocation, disease prognosis, prediction, treatment response prediction, and care integration throughout the patient journey. Limited resources, lack of organizational and managerial support, and data entry variability were some of the identified barriers. HCPs also had an explicit interest in AI explainability, desiring feature relevance explanations or a combination of feature relevance and visual explanations within the toolbox.

CONCLUSIONS

The results provide a thorough examination of the INCISIVE AI toolbox's design elements as required by the end users and potential barriers to its implementation, thus guiding the design and implementation of the INCISIVE technology. The outcome offers information about the degree of AI explainability required of the INCISIVE AI toolbox across the three services: (1) initial diagnosis; (2) disease staging, differentiation, and characterization; and (3) treatment and follow-up indicated for the toolbox. By considering the perspective of end users, INCISIVE aims to develop a solution that effectively meets their needs and drives adoption.

摘要

背景

提高临床疗效和效率的需求一直是在医学成像中开发人工智能 (AI) 工具的主要动力。INCISIVE 项目是一个欧盟资助的项目,旨在利用 AI 技术彻底改变癌症成像方法。它旨在通过开发一个基于 AI 的工具包来解决成像技术的局限性,该工具包可以提高准确性、特异性、灵敏度、可解释性和成本效益。

目的

为了确保 INCISIVE AI 服务的成功实施,进行了一项研究,以了解医疗保健专业人员 (HCP) 对拟议工具包的需求、挑战和期望,以及任何潜在的实施障碍。

方法

采用混合方法研究,包括 2 个阶段。第 1 阶段涉及使用 INCISIVE AI 工具包的用户进行用户体验 (UX) 设计研讨会。第 2 阶段通过一系列顺序问卷进行了 Delphi 研究。为了招募参与者,采用了基于项目联盟网络的目的抽样策略。共有来自塞尔维亚、意大利、希腊、塞浦路斯、西班牙和英国的 16 名 HCP 参加了 UX 设计研讨会,其中 12 名完成了 Delphi 研究。使用 SPSS(IBM Corp)进行描述性统计,能够计算 Delphi 研究列表的平均等级分数。通过 NVivo(版本 12;Lumivero)软件分析通过 UX 设计研讨会收集的定性数据。

结果

研讨会促进了头脑风暴,并确定了 INCISIVE AI 工具包的所需功能和实施障碍。随后,Delphi 研究在对这些功能进行排名方面发挥了重要作用,HCP 之间表现出强烈的共识(W=0.741,P<.001)。此外,这项研究还确定了实施障碍,HCP 之间表现出强烈的共识(W=0.705,P<.001)。主要发现表明,INCISIVE AI 工具包可以帮助解决误诊、过度诊断、诊断延迟、小病变检测、意见不合时的决策、治疗分配、疾病预后、预测、治疗反应预测以及整个患者治疗过程中的治疗整合。资源有限、缺乏组织和管理支持以及数据输入变异性是一些已确定的障碍。HCP 还明确表示对 AI 可解释性感兴趣,希望在工具包中提供特征相关性解释或特征相关性和可视化解释的组合。

结论

结果对 INCISIVE AI 工具包的设计要素进行了全面检查,这些要素是最终用户所要求的,并且对其实施的潜在障碍进行了检查,从而指导了 INCISIVE 技术的设计和实施。结果提供了有关 INCISIVE AI 工具包在三个服务中的 AI 可解释性要求的信息:(1) 初始诊断;(2) 疾病分期、分化和特征描述;(3) 工具包指示的治疗和随访。通过考虑最终用户的角度,INCISIVE 旨在开发一种能够有效满足他们需求并推动采用的解决方案。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79c8/11502975/45e922562ba6/cancer_v10i1e52639_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79c8/11502975/188bb3f4c78e/cancer_v10i1e52639_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79c8/11502975/45e922562ba6/cancer_v10i1e52639_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79c8/11502975/188bb3f4c78e/cancer_v10i1e52639_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79c8/11502975/45e922562ba6/cancer_v10i1e52639_fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Artificial Intelligence for Optimizing Cancer Imaging: User Experience Study.人工智能在癌症成像优化中的应用:用户体验研究。
JMIR Cancer. 2024 Oct 10;10:e52639. doi: 10.2196/52639.
2
Cancer care at the time of the fourth industrial revolution: an insight to healthcare professionals' perspectives on cancer care and artificial intelligence.第四次工业革命时代的癌症护理:洞察医疗保健专业人员对癌症护理和人工智能的看法。
Radiat Oncol. 2023 Oct 9;18(1):167. doi: 10.1186/s13014-023-02351-z.
3
Cancer care pathways across seven countries in Europe: What are the current obstacles? And how can artificial intelligence help?欧洲七个国家的癌症护理路径:当前有哪些障碍?人工智能如何提供帮助?
J Cancer Policy. 2024 Mar;39:100457. doi: 10.1016/j.jcpo.2023.100457. Epub 2023 Nov 25.
4
Barriers and facilitators to implementing imaging-based diagnostic artificial intelligence-assisted decision-making software in hospitals in China: a qualitative study using the updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.在中国医院实施基于影像的诊断人工智能辅助决策软件的障碍和促进因素:使用更新的实施研究综合框架进行的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Sep 10;14(9):e084398. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084398.
5
A Clinical Decision Support System for Sleep Staging Tasks With Explanations From Artificial Intelligence: User-Centered Design and Evaluation Study.具有人工智能解释的睡眠分期任务临床决策支持系统:以用户为中心的设计和评估研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jan 19;24(1):e28659. doi: 10.2196/28659.
6
Experiences of cancer survivors in Europe: Has anything changed? Can artificial intelligence offer a solution?欧洲癌症幸存者的经历:有什么变化吗?人工智能能提供解决方案吗?
Front Oncol. 2022 Sep 14;12:888938. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.888938. eCollection 2022.
7
Towards Data Integration for AI in Cancer Research.迈向癌症研究人工智能的数据整合。
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2021 Nov;2021:2054-2057. doi: 10.1109/EMBC46164.2021.9629675.
8
Consensus statements on the current landscape of artificial intelligence applications in endoscopy, addressing roadblocks, and advancing artificial intelligence in gastroenterology.关于人工智能在内窥镜检查中的当前应用情况、解决障碍以及推动胃肠病学领域人工智能发展的共识声明。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2025 Jan;101(1):2-9.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.12.003. Epub 2024 Apr 17.
9
The Role of Artificial Intelligence Model Documentation in Translational Science: Scoping Review.人工智能模型文档在转化科学中的作用:范围综述
Interact J Med Res. 2023 Jul 14;12:e45903. doi: 10.2196/45903.
10
Health Care Professionals' and Parents' Perspectives on the Use of AI for Pain Monitoring in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: Multisite Qualitative Study.医疗保健专业人员和家长对在新生儿重症监护病房使用人工智能进行疼痛监测的看法:多地点定性研究
JMIR AI. 2024 Feb 9;3:e51535. doi: 10.2196/51535.

本文引用的文献

1
Cancer care pathways across seven countries in Europe: What are the current obstacles? And how can artificial intelligence help?欧洲七个国家的癌症护理路径:当前有哪些障碍?人工智能如何提供帮助?
J Cancer Policy. 2024 Mar;39:100457. doi: 10.1016/j.jcpo.2023.100457. Epub 2023 Nov 25.
2
Cancer care at the time of the fourth industrial revolution: an insight to healthcare professionals' perspectives on cancer care and artificial intelligence.第四次工业革命时代的癌症护理:洞察医疗保健专业人员对癌症护理和人工智能的看法。
Radiat Oncol. 2023 Oct 9;18(1):167. doi: 10.1186/s13014-023-02351-z.
3
Experiences of cancer survivors in Europe: Has anything changed? Can artificial intelligence offer a solution?
欧洲癌症幸存者的经历:有什么变化吗?人工智能能提供解决方案吗?
Front Oncol. 2022 Sep 14;12:888938. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.888938. eCollection 2022.
4
AI support for ethical decision-making around resuscitation: proceed with care.人工智能在复苏相关伦理决策中的支持:需谨慎前行。
J Med Ethics. 2022 Mar;48(3):175-183. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106786. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
5
The implications of missed or misinterpreted cases of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma on imaging: a multi-centered population-based study.漏诊和误诊胰腺导管腺癌对影像学的影响:一项多中心基于人群的研究。
Eur Radiol. 2021 Jan;31(1):212-221. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07120-0. Epub 2020 Aug 12.
6
A Roadmap for Foundational Research on Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging: From the 2018 NIH/RSNA/ACR/The Academy Workshop.人工智能在医学影像领域基础研究路线图:来自 2018 年 NIH/RSNA/ACR/美国学院联合研讨会
Radiology. 2019 Jun;291(3):781-791. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019190613. Epub 2019 Apr 16.
7
Physicians' Perceptions of Chatbots in Health Care: Cross-Sectional Web-Based Survey.医生对医疗保健中聊天机器人的认知:基于网络的横断面调查。
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Apr 5;21(4):e12887. doi: 10.2196/12887.
8
Artificial intelligence in cancer imaging: Clinical challenges and applications.人工智能在癌症成像中的应用:临床挑战与应用
CA Cancer J Clin. 2019 Mar;69(2):127-157. doi: 10.3322/caac.21552. Epub 2019 Feb 5.
9
Artificial intelligence in medical imaging: threat or opportunity? Radiologists again at the forefront of innovation in medicine.医学成像中的人工智能:威胁还是机遇?放射科医生再次站在医学创新的前沿。
Eur Radiol Exp. 2018 Oct 24;2(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s41747-018-0061-6.
10
Overdiagnosis in primary care: framing the problem and finding solutions.初级保健中的过度诊断:问题的提出与解决。
BMJ. 2018 Aug 14;362:k2820. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k2820.