School of Computing, Ulster University, Belfast, United Kingdom.
School of Electronics, Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Oct 10;26:e58616. doi: 10.2196/58616.
With an increasing number of digital health apps available in app stores, it is important to assess these technologies reliably regarding their quality. This is done to mitigate the risks associated with their use. There are many different guidelines, methods, and metrics available to assess digital health apps with regard to their quality.
This study aimed to give a holistic summary of the current methods and "condition agnostic" frameworks that are broadly applicable for the quality assessment of all digital health apps.
A systematic search of literature was conducted on 4 databases: Scopus, PubMed, ACM Digital Library, and IEEE Xplore. We followed the PICOS (Population, Patient, or Problem; Intervention; Comparison; Outcomes; and Study Design) and PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) methodologies when conducting this umbrella review. The search was conducted on January 26, 2024, for review articles published between 2018 and 2023. We identified 4781 candidate papers for inclusion; after title and abstract screening, 39 remained. After full-text analysis, we included 15 review articles in the full review.
Of the 15 review articles, scoping reviews were the most common (n=6, 40%), followed by systematic reviews (n=4, 27%), narrative reviews (n=4, 27%), and a rapid review (n=1, 7%). A total of 4 (27%) review articles proposed assessment criteria for digital health apps. "Data privacy and/or security" was the most mentioned criterion (n=13, 87%) and "Cost" was the least mentioned criterion (n=1, 7%) for the assessment of digital health apps. The Mobile App Rating Scale was the most frequently used framework for quality assessment of digital health apps.
There is a lack of unity or consolidation across identified frameworks, as most do not meet all the identified criteria from the reviewed articles. Safety concerns associated with the use of digital health apps may be mitigated with the use of quality frameworks.
随着应用商店中数字健康应用程序的数量不断增加,可靠地评估这些技术的质量非常重要。这样做是为了降低与使用这些技术相关的风险。有许多不同的指南、方法和指标可用于评估数字健康应用程序的质量。
本研究旨在全面总结目前广泛适用于所有数字健康应用程序质量评估的方法和“与条件无关”的框架。
我们在 4 个数据库(Scopus、PubMed、ACM Digital Library 和 IEEE Xplore)中进行了系统的文献搜索。在进行这一伞式综述时,我们遵循了 PICOS(人群、患者或问题;干预;比较;结局;和研究设计)和 PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目)方法学。搜索于 2024 年 1 月 26 日进行,以纳入 2018 年至 2023 年期间发表的综述文章。我们确定了 4781 篇候选论文以供纳入;经过标题和摘要筛选后,仍有 39 篇。经过全文分析,我们在全文综述中纳入了 15 篇综述文章。
在这 15 篇综述文章中,范围综述最为常见(n=6,40%),其次是系统综述(n=4,27%)、叙述性综述(n=4,27%)和快速综述(n=1,7%)。共有 4 篇(27%)综述文章为数字健康应用程序提出了评估标准。“数据隐私和/或安全性”是被提及最多的标准(n=13,87%),而“成本”是被提及最少的标准(n=1,7%)。移动应用程序评级量表是最常用于评估数字健康应用程序质量的框架。
在确定的框架之间缺乏统一性或一致性,因为大多数框架都没有满足从综述文章中确定的所有标准。使用质量框架可以减轻与使用数字健康应用程序相关的安全问题。