University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 3550 Terrace St, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Apr 20;21(1):311. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03785-7.
The United States is currently facing a maternal morbidity and mortality crisis, with the highest rates of any resource-rich nation. In efforts to address this, new guidelines for postpartum care suggest that mobile health (mHealth) apps can help provide complementary clinical support for new mothers during the postpartum period. However, to date no study has evaluated the quality of existing mHealth tools targeted to this time period in terms of sufficiency of maternal health information, inclusivity of people of color, and app usability.
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) standards were used to review the peripartum apps from the Apple and Google Play stores in either the Health/Fitness, Medical, or Education categories. Apps were evaluated for extent and quality of maternal health information and inclusivity of people of color using an a priori coding scheme. App usability was evaluated using the Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS) score.
Of the 301 apps from the Apple and Google Play stores, 25 met criteria for final evaluation. Of the 30 maternal health topics coded for, the median number addressed by apps was 19.5 (65%). Peripartum behaviors were more frequently addressed than peripartum outpatient care topics and peripartum acute health risks. The coverage of maternal health information and inclusivity of people of color in app imagery both correlated positively with the MARS usability score of the app. Only 8 apps (32%) portrayed greater than 24% images of people of color- the percent of non-white Americans according to 2019 census estimates. There was no correlation between MARS usability score and number of app users, as estimated by number of ratings for the app available on the app store. In addition, apps with evidence-based maternal health information had greater MARS engagement, information, and aesthetics scores. However, presence of evidence-based information did not correlate with greater numbers of app users.
Current commercially available peripartum apps range widely in quality. Overall current app offerings generally do not provide adequate maternal health information and are not optimally accessible to the target users in terms of inclusivity of women of color or app usability. Apps delivering evidence-based information and more usable design are more likely to meet these standards but are not more likely to be downloaded by users.
美国目前正面临产妇发病率和死亡率危机,其发病率在资源丰富的国家中处于最高水平。为了解决这一问题,新的产后护理指南建议移动健康 (mHealth) 应用程序可以在产后期间为新妈妈提供补充的临床支持。然而,迄今为止,尚无研究评估针对这一时期的现有 mHealth 工具的质量,这些工具在孕产妇健康信息的充分性、有色人种的包容性以及应用程序可用性方面的情况。
采用系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目 (PRISMA) 标准,从苹果和谷歌应用商店的健康/健身、医疗或教育类别中审查围产期应用程序。使用预先制定的编码方案评估应用程序中孕产妇健康信息的范围和质量以及有色人种的包容性。使用移动应用程序评级量表 (MARS) 评分评估应用程序的可用性。
从苹果和谷歌应用商店中,有 301 个应用程序符合最终评估标准。在编码的 30 个孕产妇健康主题中,应用程序平均涵盖 19.5 个主题 (65%)。围产期行为比围产期门诊护理主题和围产期急性健康风险更常被提及。应用程序中孕产妇健康信息的覆盖范围和图像中有色人种的包容性与应用程序的 MARS 可用性评分呈正相关。只有 8 个应用程序 (32%) 描绘了超过 24%的有色人种图像——根据 2019 年人口普查估计,这是美国非白人的比例。MARS 可用性评分与应用程序在应用商店中的评分数量(即应用程序的用户数量)之间没有相关性。此外,具有基于证据的孕产妇健康信息的应用程序具有更高的 MARS 参与度、信息和美学评分。然而,基于证据的信息的存在与更多的应用程序用户数量无关。
目前商业上可用的围产期应用程序在质量上差异很大。总体而言,目前的应用程序产品通常不能提供足够的孕产妇健康信息,并且在有色人种女性的包容性或应用程序可用性方面,并不最适合目标用户。提供基于证据的信息和更易用的设计的应用程序更有可能符合这些标准,但不太可能被用户下载。