Zhou Conghui, Jia Yuwei, Zhang Qi, Huang Wenhua, Yan Jizhong, Ying Xuhui, Zhang Hui
College of Pharmaceutical Science, Zhejiang University of Technology, No. 18, Chaowang Road, Hangzhou, 310014, China.
Research Institute of Chiatai Qingchunbao Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Hangzhou, 310030, China.
J Ethnopharmacol. 2025 Jan 30;337(Pt 2):118923. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2024.118923. Epub 2024 Oct 9.
Pseudobulbus Cremastrae seu Pleiones (PCSP) is a multi-source traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) with diverse chemical compositions and toxicity levels. The authenticity identification and safety evaluation of PCSP have attracted widespread attention in clinical applications.
The objective of this study was to evaluate the authenticity and safety of commercially available PCSP.
Morphological and microscopic identification, HPLC chromatogram, UPLC-Q-TOF-MS/MS with molecular networking were applied to the authenticity identification of PCSP. The safety of different PCSPs was evaluated by acute toxicity in zebrafish at maximum non-lethal concentration (MNLC) and 10% lethal concentration (LC). Intestinal toxicity of PCSP was assessed through histological staining, intestinal goblet cells, neutrophils, and intestinal opacity.
Four sources of PCSP varied in size, epidermal longitudinal grooves, and microscopic features. GNPS analysis identified 61, 47, 44, and 56 chemical compounds in Cremastra appendiculate (CA), Oreorchis patens (Lindl.) Lindl. (OPL), Iphigenia indica A. Gray (IIG), and Tulipa edulis (Miq.) Baker (TEB). Colchicine and militarine, were discovered as distinguishing markers. Acute toxicity in zebrafish ranked as follows: IIG > OPL > CA > TEB. Further studies on the intestinal toxicity of the authentic PCSP (CA, OPL) showed that CA induced less damage with a smaller lumen area, fewer neutrophils and goblet cells, and reduced peristalsis inhibition compared to OPL, indicating greater safety.
Four different sources of PCSP were accurately distinguished based on three dimensions: character, components, and toxicity. OPL and CA were considered as genuine products, while CA with lower toxicity was more suitable for clinical applications.
假百合(Pseudobulbus Cremastrae seu Pleiones,PCSP)是一种多来源的中药,具有多种化学成分和毒性水平。PCSP 的真实性鉴定和安全性评估在临床应用中引起了广泛关注。
本研究旨在评估市售 PCSP 的真实性和安全性。
采用形态学和显微镜鉴定、HPLC 色谱、UPLC-Q-TOF-MS/MS 与分子网络技术对 PCSP 进行真实性鉴定。采用最大非致死浓度(MNLC)和 10%致死浓度(LC)的斑马鱼急性毒性试验评估不同 PCSP 的安全性。通过组织学染色、肠上皮细胞、中性粒细胞和肠黏膜透明度评估 PCSP 的肠道毒性。
四种来源的 PCSP 在大小、表皮纵向槽和显微镜特征上存在差异。GNPS 分析鉴定出 61、47、44 和 56 种化学成分,分别来自假百合(CA)、长瓣兜被兰(Oreorchis patens(Lindl.)Lindl.)(OPL)、印度石蒜(Iphigenia indica A. Gray)(IIG)和郁金香(Tulipa edulis(Miq.)Baker)(TEB)。秋水仙碱和千里光宁碱被发现是区分标记物。斑马鱼急性毒性结果依次为:IIG>OPL>CA>TEB。进一步研究真实 PCSP(CA、OPL)的肠道毒性表明,CA 诱导的管腔面积更小、中性粒细胞和杯状细胞更少、蠕动抑制减少,与 OPL 相比,CA 具有更大的安全性。
通过形态、成分和毒性三个维度准确区分了四种不同来源的 PCSP。OPL 和 CA 被认为是真品,而毒性较低的 CA 更适合临床应用。