• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在埃塞俄比亚西北部 Dangur 区的农村社区中,产妇等待家庭的利用情况及其相关因素:一项基于社区的横断面家庭调查结果。

Maternity waiting home utilization and associated factors in the rural community of Dangur District, Northwestern Ethiopia: results from a community-based cross-sectional household survey.

机构信息

Department of Population and Family Health, Institute of Health, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia.

Department of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Assosa University, Assosa, Ethiopia.

出版信息

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Oct 10;24(1):661. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06872-7.

DOI:10.1186/s12884-024-06872-7
PMID:39390565
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11468051/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Approximately 80% of people in Ethiopia live in rural areas, where poor access to maternity services, accounts for the majority of maternal and perinatal deaths. Maternity waiting homes are residential facilities for women who come from remote areas to stay and wait before giving birth at health facilities, particularly in hospitals and health centers. It is a new initiative and one of the strategies that increase skilled care utilization at birth. However, there is no evidence on the status of maternity waiting home utilization in the study area. Therefore, this study aimed to generate evidence on the status of maternity waiting home utilization and its associated factors.

METHODS

A community-based cross-sectional household survey was conducted from June 5-30, 2022. The sample size was calculated using the single population proportion formula, which resulted in 354 participants. The study population included mothers who gave birth within 12 months before the survey were selected by using a systematic sampling method. The data were coded, edited, cleaned, and entered into Epi Data version 3.1. The data were subsequently exported to SPSS version 25 for analysis. Descriptive, bivariable, and multivariable binary logistic regression analyses were performed. The results are presented in the text, figures, and tables. Finally, variables with a p value < 0.05 in the multivariable analysis were reported as significantly associated with the independent variables and outcome variable.

RESULTS

The magnitude of maternity waiting home utilization was 36.4% (95% CI = 31.4, 41.8). Being knowledgeable about the presence of maternity waiting home (AOR = 3.9; 95% CI: 1.0-15.2), being able to afford transportation (AOR = 2.4; 95% CI: 1.01-5.9), being home delivery (AOR = 0.007; 95% CI: 0.002-0.031) and being acess to transportation services (AOR = 3.0; 95% CI: 1.2-7.5) were significantly associated with maternity waiting home utilization.

CONCLUSION

The magnitude of maternity waiting home utilization in the study area was found to be low. Access to and affordability of transportation services, being knowledgeable and being home delivery were associated factors for the use of maternity waiting homes. Therefore, increasing maternal knowledge, economically empowering women and respecting care while waiting at maternity homes are important for improving the utilization of maternity waiting homes.

摘要

背景

在埃塞俄比亚,约 80%的人口居住在农村地区,那里的产妇服务获取机会有限,导致大部分孕产妇和围产期死亡。母婴等候之家是为那些从偏远地区前来分娩的妇女提供的住宿设施,让她们在卫生设施(特别是医院和保健中心)分娩前有地方等待。这是一项新举措,也是增加分娩时熟练护理利用的策略之一。然而,在研究地区,没有关于母婴等候之家利用情况的证据。因此,本研究旨在提供母婴等候之家利用情况及其相关因素的证据。

方法

本研究采用基于社区的横断面家庭调查方法,于 2022 年 6 月 5 日至 30 日进行。使用单一人口比例公式计算样本量,得出 354 名参与者。研究人群包括在调查前 12 个月内分娩的母亲,通过系统抽样方法选择。使用 EpiData 版本 3.1 对数据进行编码、编辑、清理和输入。随后将数据导出到 SPSS 版本 25 进行分析。进行描述性、双变量和多变量二元逻辑回归分析。结果以文本、图表和表格的形式呈现。最后,多变量分析中 p 值<0.05 的变量被报告为与自变量和因变量显著相关。

结果

母婴等候之家的利用程度为 36.4%(95%CI=31.4,41.8)。了解母婴等候之家的存在(AOR=3.9;95%CI:1.0-15.2)、有能力支付交通费用(AOR=2.4;95%CI:1.01-5.9)、在家分娩(AOR=0.007;95%CI:0.002-0.031)和获得交通服务(AOR=3.0;95%CI:1.2-7.5)与母婴等候之家的利用显著相关。

结论

研究地区母婴等候之家的利用程度较低。获得和负担得起交通服务、了解情况和在家分娩是使用母婴等候之家的相关因素。因此,增加产妇的知识、增强妇女的经济权能以及尊重在母婴等候之家等待时的护理,对于提高母婴等候之家的利用至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bda/11468051/6f9e63faf21d/12884_2024_6872_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bda/11468051/6f0e2f067f39/12884_2024_6872_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bda/11468051/6f9e63faf21d/12884_2024_6872_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bda/11468051/6f0e2f067f39/12884_2024_6872_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bda/11468051/6f9e63faf21d/12884_2024_6872_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Maternity waiting home utilization and associated factors in the rural community of Dangur District, Northwestern Ethiopia: results from a community-based cross-sectional household survey.在埃塞俄比亚西北部 Dangur 区的农村社区中,产妇等待家庭的利用情况及其相关因素:一项基于社区的横断面家庭调查结果。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Oct 10;24(1):661. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06872-7.
2
Utilization of maternal waiting home and associated factors among women who gave birth in the last one year, Dabat district, Northwest Ethiopia.过去一年在埃塞俄比亚西北部达巴特地区分娩的产妇在家待产的利用情况及其影响因素。
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 8;17(7):e0271113. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271113. eCollection 2022.
3
Intention to use maternity waiting home and associated factors among pregnant women in Gamo Gofa zone, Southern Ethiopia, 2019.2019 年,在埃塞俄比亚南部的 Gamo Gofa 地区,孕妇使用母婴等候之家的意愿及相关因素。
PLoS One. 2021 May 13;16(5):e0251196. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251196. eCollection 2021.
4
Utilization of pregnant women waiting area and associated factors among mothers at Damboya District, Kembata Tembaro Zone, Southern Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚南部肯巴塔·滕巴罗地区丹博亚区孕妇等候区的使用情况及母亲中的相关因素
Pan Afr Med J. 2023 Nov 23;46:89. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2023.46.89.33071. eCollection 2023.
5
Maternity waiting homes as component of birth preparedness and complication readiness for rural women in hard-to-reach areas in Ethiopia.孕产妇等候家园:作为埃塞俄比亚偏远农村地区母婴生育准备和并发症处理的一部分
Reprod Health. 2021 Feb 2;18(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01086-y.
6
Institutional Delivery Service Utilization among Women from Rural Districts of Wolaita and Dawro Zones, Southern Ethiopia; a Community Based Cross-Sectional Study.埃塞俄比亚南部沃莱塔和达沃罗地区农村妇女的机构分娩服务利用情况;一项基于社区的横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 17;11(3):e0151082. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151082. eCollection 2016.
7
Predictors of skilled maternal health services utilizations: A case of rural women in Ethiopia.熟练孕产妇卫生服务利用的预测因素:以埃塞俄比亚农村妇女为例。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 19;16(2):e0246237. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246237. eCollection 2021.
8
Compassionate and respectful maternity care during facility based child birth and women's intent to use maternity service in Bahir Dar, Ethiopia.在埃塞俄比亚巴赫达尔,基于医疗机构的分娩过程中,充满同情和尊重的产妇护理与妇女使用产妇服务的意愿。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Jul 9;18(1):294. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-1909-8.
9
Evaluation of a community-based intervention package to improve knowledge of obstetric danger signs, birth preparedness, and institutional delivery care utilization in Arba Minch Zuria District, Ethiopia: a cluster-randomized trial.评价埃塞俄比亚阿尔巴明奇祖里亚地区一个基于社区的干预包,以提高对产科危险信号、生育准备和机构分娩护理利用的知识:一项集群随机试验。
Reprod Health. 2023 Nov 18;20(1):169. doi: 10.1186/s12978-023-01713-w.
10
Magnitude and factors associated with institutional delivery service utilization among childbearing mothers in Cheha district, Gurage zone, SNNPR, Ethiopia: a community based cross sectional study.埃塞俄比亚南方各族州古拉格地区切哈区育龄母亲机构分娩服务利用情况的规模及相关因素:一项基于社区的横断面研究
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Nov 17;15:299. doi: 10.1186/s12884-015-0716-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Benefits, barriers and enablers of maternity waiting homes utilization in Ethiopia: an integrative review of national implementation experience to date.埃塞俄比亚利用产妇等候之家的益处、障碍和推动因素:对迄今为止国家实施经验的综合审查。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Sep 2;22(1):675. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04954-y.
2
Maternity waiting homes utilization and associated factors among childbearing women in rural settings of Finfinnee special zone, central Ethiopia: A community based cross-sectional study.农村背景下孕产妇等候之家的利用及其相关因素:来自埃塞俄比亚中部芬芬地区的一项基于社区的横断面研究
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 17;17(3):e0265182. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265182. eCollection 2022.
3
Determinants of maternity waiting home utilization in Sidama Zone, Southern Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study.
埃塞俄比亚南部锡达马地区产妇在家分娩意愿的决定因素:一项横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 14;17(3):e0264416. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264416. eCollection 2022.
4
Maternity waiting homes as component of birth preparedness and complication readiness for rural women in hard-to-reach areas in Ethiopia.孕产妇等候家园:作为埃塞俄比亚偏远农村地区母婴生育准备和并发症处理的一部分
Reprod Health. 2021 Feb 2;18(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01086-y.
5
A Culturally Sensitive and Supportive Maternity Care Service Increases the Uptake of Maternity Waiting Homes in Ethiopia.一项具有文化敏感性且提供支持的孕产妇保健服务提高了埃塞俄比亚孕产妇候产之家的使用率。
Int J Womens Health. 2020 Oct 9;12:813-821. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S268245. eCollection 2020.
6
Factors associated with maternity waiting home use among women in Jimma Zone, Ethiopia: a multilevel cross-sectional analysis.埃塞俄比亚吉马地区女性使用产妇候产之家的相关因素:一项多层次横断面分析
BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 28;9(8):e028210. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028210.
7
Distribution of maternity waiting homes and their correlation with perinatal mortality and direct obstetric complication rates in Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚母婴等候之家的分布及其与围产期死亡率和直接产科并发症发生率的相关性。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Jun 25;19(1):214. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2356-x.
8
Facilitators for maternity waiting home utilisation at Attat Hospital: a mixed-methods study based on 45 years of experience.促进阿塔特医院产妇待家分娩的因素:基于 45 年经验的混合方法研究。
Trop Med Int Health. 2018 Dec;23(12):1332-1341. doi: 10.1111/tmi.13158. Epub 2018 Oct 23.
9
Factors associated with intended use of a maternity waiting home in Southern Ethiopia: a community-based cross-sectional study.与埃塞俄比亚南部使用母婴等候之家意图相关的因素:一项基于社区的横断面研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Jan 19;18(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-1670-z.
10
Personal and environmental factors associated with the utilisation of maternity waiting homes in rural Zambia.赞比亚农村地区与产妇候产之家使用情况相关的个人及环境因素
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 May 4;17(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1317-5.