Patil Akkamahadevi, Vyshnavi S, Raja Thanigai, Shastry Veeranna, Thammaiah Srinivas H, Archana K N
Department of Anaesthesiology, Dr. Moopens Medical College, Meppadi, Wayanad, Kerala, India.
Department of Anaesthesiology, Venereology and Leprosy, JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research, Mysuru, Karnataka, India.
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2024 Jul-Sep;40(3):510-515. doi: 10.4103/joacp.joacp_82_23. Epub 2024 Mar 28.
The treatment for postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) continues to be challenging in clinical pain management. Paravertebral block (PVB) and erector-spinae block (ESPB) are two novel techniques for treating this distressing condition. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of PVB and ESPB in preventing the progression to PHN in patients with acute herpes zoster (AHZ).
Sixty patients in pain due to AHZ were selected for a prospective randomized control study after approval from Institutional Ethical Committee. Written informed consent was taken. Patients were randomized and allotted into Control-group: standard treatment (oral antivirals, analgesics, neuropathic medicines); PVB-Group: standard treatment with PVB and ESPB- Group: standard treatment with ESPB. Under ultrasound guidance, both blocks were administered with 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine + dexamethasone 8 mg. Efficacy was evaluated on the 15, 30, and 60 day post treatment. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with adequate relief from pain and allodynia post study.
The incidence of PHN post study was 45% in the ESPB group and 40% in the PVB group and 80% in the control group ( = 0.022). The proportion of patients with pain relief was higher among the PVB group compared to the ESPB group but not statistically significant ( 0.749). On day 60, the mean pain score was 2.45 (±3.05) and 2.15 (±2.7) in ESPB and PVB groups, respectively, and 4.3 (±2.27) in the control group ( 0.003).
PVB and ESPB are effective approaches in treating patients suffering from pain due to acute zoster and help in preventing its progression to PHN.
在临床疼痛管理中,带状疱疹后神经痛(PHN)的治疗仍然具有挑战性。椎旁阻滞(PVB)和竖脊肌阻滞(ESPB)是治疗这种痛苦病症的两种新技术。我们旨在评估PVB和ESPB在预防急性带状疱疹(AHZ)患者进展为PHN方面的有效性。
经机构伦理委员会批准后,选择60例因AHZ疼痛的患者进行前瞻性随机对照研究。获得书面知情同意书。患者被随机分组并分配到对照组:标准治疗(口服抗病毒药、镇痛药、神经病变药物);PVB组:标准治疗加PVB;ESPB组:标准治疗加ESPB。在超声引导下,两种阻滞均使用20毫升0.25%布比卡因加8毫克地塞米松进行。在治疗后第15、30和60天评估疗效。主要终点是研究后疼痛和痛觉过敏得到充分缓解的患者比例。
研究后PHN的发生率在ESPB组为45%,PVB组为40%,对照组为80%(P = 0.022)。与ESPB组相比,PVB组疼痛缓解的患者比例更高,但无统计学意义(P = 0.749)。在第60天,ESPB组和PVB组的平均疼痛评分分别为2.45(±3.05)和2.15(±2.7),对照组为4.3(±2.27)(P = 0.003)。
PVB和ESPB是治疗急性带状疱疹疼痛患者的有效方法,并有助于预防其进展为PHN。