Lu Wensheng, He Shengze, Liu Qi, Gu Yaozu, Bai Jie
Department of Anesthesiology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, China.
The Second Clinical Medical School, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Front Neurol. 2025 Aug 18;16:1612871. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1612871. eCollection 2025.
Shingles is a common global disease, with the chest region being one of its most frequently affected areas. Postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) is one of the most common and debilitating complications of this disease, characterized by high incidence, prolonged duration, and treatment resistance, severely affecting patients' daily life and quality of life. Currently, research on the prevention of PHN remains limited. Nerve block, as a promising intervention, has been widely applied in clinical pain management. However, there is still no consensus on the efficacy and safety of different nerve block techniques for the prevention of chest-related PHN, warranting further systematic evaluation and comparison.
A network meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.4 and Stata 18.0, analyzing data from nine studies retrieved from four English-language databases: MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL).
This study included a total of 9 randomized controlled trials, involving 741 patients with chest herpes zoster and 8 different interventions. The results of the network meta-analysis indicated that the top three interventions in terms of total effective rate were: PVB: Amide local anesthetics + Methylene blue > PVB: Methylene blue > ESPB: Amide local anesthetics + Glucocorticoid. In terms of pain level, as assessed by the Visual Analogue Scale, the top three interventions were: PVB: Amide local anesthetics + Glucocorticoid > PVB: Amide local anesthetics > ESPB: Amide local anesthetics + Glucocorticoid.
The results of this study indicate that PVB is superior to ESPB in both reducing VAS scores and improving the total effective rate. Among the interventions, PVB: Amide local anesthetics + Methylene blue demonstrated the best performance in terms of total effective rate, while PVB: Amide local anesthetics + Glucocorticoid showed the most significant effect in reducing VAS scores.
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42024604329.
带状疱疹是一种全球常见疾病,胸部是其最常受累的部位之一。带状疱疹后神经痛(PHN)是该疾病最常见且使人衰弱的并发症之一,具有发病率高、病程长和治疗抵抗的特点,严重影响患者的日常生活和生活质量。目前,关于PHN预防的研究仍然有限。神经阻滞作为一种有前景的干预措施,已广泛应用于临床疼痛管理。然而,对于不同神经阻滞技术预防胸部相关PHN的疗效和安全性仍未达成共识,需要进一步进行系统评价和比较。
使用RevMan 5.4和Stata 18.0进行网络荟萃分析,分析从四个英文数据库检索到的九项研究的数据:MEDLINE、Embase、科学引文索引和Cochrane对照试验中央注册库(CENTRAL)。
本研究共纳入9项随机对照试验,涉及741例胸部带状疱疹患者和8种不同干预措施。网络荟萃分析结果表明,总有效率排名前三的干预措施为:椎旁阻滞(PVB):酰胺类局部麻醉药+亚甲蓝>PVB:亚甲蓝>竖脊肌平面阻滞(ESPB):酰胺类局部麻醉药+糖皮质激素。在视觉模拟量表评估的疼痛程度方面,排名前三的干预措施为:PVB:酰胺类局部麻醉药+糖皮质激素>PVB:酰胺类局部麻醉药>ESPB:酰胺类局部麻醉药+糖皮质激素。
本研究结果表明,在降低视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分和提高总有效率方面,PVB优于ESPB。在这些干预措施中,PVB:酰胺类局部麻醉药+亚甲蓝在总有效率方面表现最佳,而PVB:酰胺类局部麻醉药+糖皮质激素在降低VAS评分方面效果最显著。