• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

照射后转录抑制优先发生在高表达基因上,其方式依赖于细胞周期进程。

Transcriptional inhibition after irradiation occurs preferentially at highly expressed genes in a manner dependent on cell cycle progression.

机构信息

Weill Cornell Medicine, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, New York, United States.

Basic and Translational Research Division, Department of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, United States.

出版信息

Elife. 2024 Oct 11;13:RP94001. doi: 10.7554/eLife.94001.

DOI:10.7554/eLife.94001
PMID:39392398
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11469672/
Abstract

In response to DNA double-strand damage, ongoing transcription is inhibited to facilitate accurate DNA repair while transcriptional recovery occurs after DNA repair is complete. However, the mechanisms at play and the identity of the transcripts being regulated in this manner are unclear. In contrast to the situation following UV damage, we found that transcriptional recovery after ionizing radiation (IR) occurs in a manner independent of the HIRA histone chaperone. Sequencing of the nascent transcripts identified a programmed transcriptional response, where certain transcripts and pathways are rapidly downregulated after IR, while other transcripts and pathways are upregulated. Specifically, most of the loss of nascent transcripts occurring after IR is due to inhibition of transcriptional initiation of the highly transcribed histone genes and the rDNA. To identify factors responsible for transcriptional inhibition after IR in an unbiased manner, we performed a whole genome gRNA library CRISPR/Cas9 screen. Many of the top hits on our screen were factors required for protein neddylation. However, at short times after inhibition of neddylation, transcriptional inhibition still occurred after IR, even though neddylation was effectively inhibited. Persistent inhibition of neddylation blocked transcriptional inhibition after IR, and it also leads to cell cycle arrest. Indeed, we uncovered that many inhibitors and conditions that lead to cell cycle arrest in G or G phase also prevent transcriptional inhibition after IR. As such, it appears that transcriptional inhibition after IR occurs preferentially at highly expressed genes in cycling cells.

摘要

针对 DNA 双链损伤,正在进行的转录被抑制,以促进准确的 DNA 修复,而在 DNA 修复完成后,转录恢复发生。然而,目前尚不清楚起作用的机制以及以这种方式调节的转录本的身份。与紫外线损伤后的情况相反,我们发现,电离辐射(IR)后转录的恢复是独立于 HIRA 组蛋白伴侣发生的。对新生转录本的测序确定了一种程序化的转录反应,即在 IR 后某些转录本和途径迅速下调,而其他转录本和途径上调。具体来说,IR 后新生转录本的大部分丢失是由于高度转录的组蛋白基因和 rDNA 的转录起始抑制所致。为了以无偏倚的方式鉴定 IR 后转录抑制的原因,我们进行了全基因组 gRNA 文库 CRISPR/Cas9 筛选。我们筛选的许多主要命中是蛋白质泛素化所必需的因素。然而,在抑制泛素化后的短时间内,IR 后仍会发生转录抑制,尽管泛素化已被有效抑制。泛素化的持续抑制阻止了 IR 后转录的抑制,并且还导致细胞周期停滞。事实上,我们发现许多导致 G1 或 G2 期细胞周期停滞的抑制剂和条件也可以防止 IR 后转录的抑制。因此,似乎 IR 后转录抑制优先发生在细胞周期中高度表达的基因上。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2614/11469672/2b7bc4685e2a/elife-94001-fig7-figsupp1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2614/11469672/921b7fa48036/elife-94001-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2614/11469672/fc0c428cc104/elife-94001-fig1-figsupp1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2614/11469672/69a3129defd3/elife-94001-fig1-figsupp2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2614/11469672/322eb1a11794/elife-94001-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2614/11469672/76a69270bc98/elife-94001-fig2-figsupp1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2614/11469672/d9f8fcc98a7b/elife-94001-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2614/11469672/e6986ba419b5/elife-94001-fig3-figsupp1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2614/11469672/4d3382b6839e/elife-94001-fig3-figsupp2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2614/11469672/9f240b440b5d/elife-94001-fig3-figsupp3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2614/11469672/69f54534ab46/elife-94001-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2614/11469672/f5f4879d60ba/elife-94001-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2614/11469672/e8756fcc3fc5/elife-94001-fig5-figsupp1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2614/11469672/45ac287891b8/elife-94001-fig5-figsupp2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2614/11469672/502c40939443/elife-94001-fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2614/11469672/cc02a9b7102c/elife-94001-fig6-figsupp1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2614/11469672/8120824d1dcb/elife-94001-fig6-figsupp2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2614/11469672/6b672fa359ea/elife-94001-fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2614/11469672/2b7bc4685e2a/elife-94001-fig7-figsupp1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2614/11469672/921b7fa48036/elife-94001-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2614/11469672/fc0c428cc104/elife-94001-fig1-figsupp1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2614/11469672/69a3129defd3/elife-94001-fig1-figsupp2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2614/11469672/322eb1a11794/elife-94001-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2614/11469672/76a69270bc98/elife-94001-fig2-figsupp1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2614/11469672/d9f8fcc98a7b/elife-94001-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2614/11469672/e6986ba419b5/elife-94001-fig3-figsupp1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2614/11469672/4d3382b6839e/elife-94001-fig3-figsupp2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2614/11469672/9f240b440b5d/elife-94001-fig3-figsupp3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2614/11469672/69f54534ab46/elife-94001-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2614/11469672/f5f4879d60ba/elife-94001-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2614/11469672/e8756fcc3fc5/elife-94001-fig5-figsupp1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2614/11469672/45ac287891b8/elife-94001-fig5-figsupp2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2614/11469672/502c40939443/elife-94001-fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2614/11469672/cc02a9b7102c/elife-94001-fig6-figsupp1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2614/11469672/8120824d1dcb/elife-94001-fig6-figsupp2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2614/11469672/6b672fa359ea/elife-94001-fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2614/11469672/2b7bc4685e2a/elife-94001-fig7-figsupp1.jpg

相似文献

1
Transcriptional inhibition after irradiation occurs preferentially at highly expressed genes in a manner dependent on cell cycle progression.照射后转录抑制优先发生在高表达基因上,其方式依赖于细胞周期进程。
Elife. 2024 Oct 11;13:RP94001. doi: 10.7554/eLife.94001.
2
Transcriptional inhibition after irradiation occurs preferentially at highly expressed genes in a manner dependent on cell cycle progression.辐射后的转录抑制优先发生在高表达基因上,其方式依赖于细胞周期进程。
bioRxiv. 2024 Jun 11:2023.11.20.567799. doi: 10.1101/2023.11.20.567799.
3
Suppressed expression of non-DSB repair genes inhibits gamma-radiation-induced cytogenetic repair and cell cycle arrest.非双链断裂修复基因的表达受抑制会抑制γ射线诱导的细胞遗传学修复和细胞周期停滞。
DNA Repair (Amst). 2008 Nov 1;7(11):1835-45. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2008.07.009. Epub 2008 Sep 2.
4
[Cell cycle regulation after exposure to ionizing radiation].[暴露于电离辐射后的细胞周期调控]
Bull Cancer. 1999 Apr;86(4):345-57.
5
Cell cycle arrest and apoptosis provoked by UV radiation-induced DNA damage are transcriptionally highly divergent responses.紫外线辐射诱导的DNA损伤所引发的细胞周期停滞和凋亡是转录水平上高度不同的反应。
Nucleic Acids Res. 2003 Aug 15;31(16):4779-90. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkg675.
6
Identification of primary transcriptional regulation of cell cycle-regulated genes upon DNA damage.DNA损伤后细胞周期调控基因的初级转录调控的鉴定。
Cell Cycle. 2007 Apr 15;6(8):972-81. doi: 10.4161/cc.6.8.4106. Epub 2007 Apr 19.
7
DNA damage responses in murine Pre-B cells with genetic deficiencies in damage response genes.具有损伤反应基因遗传缺陷的小鼠前 B 细胞中的 DNA 损伤反应。
Cell Cycle. 2020 Jan;19(1):67-83. doi: 10.1080/15384101.2019.1693118. Epub 2019 Nov 22.
8
Shift in G-Checkpoint from ATM-Alone to a Cooperative ATM Plus ATR Regulation with Increasing Dose of Radiation.辐射剂量增加时,G 期检验点从 ATM 单独作用转变为 ATM 与 ATR 协同调节。
Cells. 2021 Dec 27;11(1):63. doi: 10.3390/cells11010063.
9
p53 Binding to the p21 promoter is dependent on the nature of DNA damage.p53与p21启动子的结合取决于DNA损伤的性质。
Cell Cycle. 2008 Aug 15;7(16):2535-43. doi: 10.4161/cc.7.16.6440. Epub 2008 Aug 12.
10
Effect of ionizing radiation in sensory ganglion neurons: organization and dynamics of nuclear compartments of DNA damage/repair and their relationship with transcription and cell cycle.电离辐射对感觉神经元神经节的影响:DNA 损伤/修复核区室的组织和动态及其与转录和细胞周期的关系。
Acta Neuropathol. 2011 Oct;122(4):481-93. doi: 10.1007/s00401-011-0869-0. Epub 2011 Sep 14.

引用本文的文献

1
[Treatment strategy for severe radiation-induced ulcers near major blood vessels].[主要血管附近严重放射性溃疡的治疗策略]
Zhonghua Shao Shang Yu Chuang Mian Xiu Fu Za Zhi. 2025 May 20;41(5):432-439. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20240521-00191.

本文引用的文献

1
Chromatin compartmentalization regulates the response to DNA damage.染色质区室化调节对 DNA 损伤的反应。
Nature. 2023 Nov;623(7985):183-192. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06635-y. Epub 2023 Oct 18.
2
Tissue fibrosis induced by radiotherapy: current understanding of the molecular mechanisms, diagnosis and therapeutic advances.放疗诱导的组织纤维化:分子机制、诊断及治疗进展的最新认识。
J Transl Med. 2023 Oct 9;21(1):708. doi: 10.1186/s12967-023-04554-0.
3
clusterProfiler 4.0: A universal enrichment tool for interpreting omics data.
clusterProfiler 4.0:用于解释组学数据的通用富集工具。
Innovation (Camb). 2021 Jul 1;2(3):100141. doi: 10.1016/j.xinn.2021.100141. eCollection 2021 Aug 28.
4
LIN37-DREAM prevents DNA end resection and homologous recombination at DNA double-strand breaks in quiescent cells.LIN37-DREAM 可防止静止细胞中 DNA 双链断裂处的 DNA 末端切除和同源重组。
Elife. 2021 Sep 3;10:e68466. doi: 10.7554/eLife.68466.
5
Dissecting regulatory pathways for transcription recovery following DNA damage reveals a non-canonical function of the histone chaperone HIRA.解析 DNA 损伤后转录恢复的调控途径揭示了组蛋白伴侣 HIRA 的非经典功能。
Nat Commun. 2021 Jun 22;12(1):3835. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-24153-1.
6
Age-Dependent Ribosomal DNA Variations in Mice.年龄相关的小鼠核糖体 DNA 变异。
Mol Cell Biol. 2020 Oct 26;40(22). doi: 10.1128/MCB.00368-20.
7
Treacle controls the nucleolar response to rDNA breaks via TOPBP1 recruitment and ATR activation.三磷酸甘油醛(treacle)通过招募 TOPBP1 和激活 ATR 来控制核仁对 rDNA 断裂的反应。
Nat Commun. 2020 Jan 8;11(1):123. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13981-x.
8
Regional Gene Repression by DNA Double-Strand Breaks in G Phase Cells.G 期细胞中 DNA 双链断裂的区域基因抑制。
Mol Cell Biol. 2019 Nov 25;39(24). doi: 10.1128/MCB.00181-19. Print 2019 Dec 15.
9
WWP2 ubiquitylates RNA polymerase II for DNA-PK-dependent transcription arrest and repair at DNA breaks.WWP2 使 RNA 聚合酶 II 泛素化,导致 DNA 断裂处的 DNA-PK 依赖性转录停滞和修复。
Genes Dev. 2019 Jun 1;33(11-12):684-704. doi: 10.1101/gad.321943.118. Epub 2019 May 2.
10
Repression of Transcription at DNA Breaks Requires Cohesin throughout Interphase and Prevents Genome Instability.在有丝分裂期全程中,黏连蛋白抑制 DNA 断裂处的转录,防止基因组不稳定性。
Mol Cell. 2019 Jan 17;73(2):212-223.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.11.001. Epub 2018 Dec 13.