Mascayano Franco, Lee Jiwon, Yang Xinyu, Li Zeyu, Casanueva Rodrigo, Hernández Viviana, Burgos Javiera, Florence Ana Carolina, Yang Lawrence H, Susser Ezra
Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Division of Behavioral Health Services and Policy Research, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, USA.
Schizophr Bull. 2025 Sep 8;51(5):1312-1327. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbae157.
Numerous studies have found that being born or raised in urban environments increases the odds of developing psychosis in Northern and Western Europe. However, available research from Southern Europe, Latin America, and Asia has reported null results. A limitation in most studies to date is the inadequate characterization of urban and rural life components that may contribute to varying psychosis risk across regions.
To deepen our understanding of the different concepts and measures of urbanicity and related factors in psychosis research, we conducted a qualitative systematic literature review extracting information from studies published between 2000 and 2024.
Sixty-one articles met the inclusion and exclusion criteria and were used in the thematic analysis. The analysis revealed that urbanicity lacked a single, coherent definition across studies and regions. Three major categories of themes were developed from the analysis: (1) Urbanicity comprises several interconnected constructs, (2) Urbanicity measurements vary between countries from the Global North and the Global South, and (3) Urbanicity operates through key neighborhood-level mechanisms.
Future research on urbanicity and psychosis should consider the potential limitations of urbanicity's conceptualization and operationalization and aim to address these limitations by focusing on contextual, historical, and community-level factors, utilizing locally validated measures, and employing mixed-method designs.
众多研究发现,在北欧和西欧,于城市环境中出生或成长会增加患精神病的几率。然而,来自南欧、拉丁美洲和亚洲的现有研究报告结果为阴性。迄今为止,大多数研究的一个局限性在于,对可能导致不同地区精神病风险各异的城乡生活组成部分的特征描述不足。
为了加深我们对精神病研究中城市化的不同概念、衡量标准及相关因素的理解,我们进行了一项定性系统文献综述,从2000年至2024年发表的研究中提取信息。
61篇文章符合纳入和排除标准,并被用于主题分析。分析表明,不同研究和地区对城市化缺乏统一、连贯的定义。分析得出了三大类主题:(1)城市化由几个相互关联的概念构成,(2)全球北方和南方国家的城市化衡量标准有所不同,(3)城市化通过关键的邻里层面机制发挥作用。
未来关于城市化与精神病的研究应考虑城市化概念化和操作化的潜在局限性,并旨在通过关注背景、历史和社区层面因素、使用经过本地验证的衡量标准以及采用混合方法设计来解决这些局限性。