Beniwal Manish, Morisako Hiroki, Sasaki Tsuyoshi, Ikegami Masaki, Nagahama Atsufumi, Tanoue Yuta, Sakamoto Hiroaki, Goto Takeo
1Department of Neurosurgery, Osaka Metropolitan University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan; and.
2Department of Neurosurgery, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (NIMHANS), Bengaluru, India.
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2024 Oct 11;35(1):38-45. doi: 10.3171/2024.7.PEDS24174. Print 2025 Jan 1.
Pediatric extended endonasal procedures pose significant surgical challenges. Lesions from the suprasellar region to the lower clivus necessitate extensive exposure. This study examined whether drilling the spheno-occipital synchondrosis (SOS) to remove the posterior clinoid process and dorsum sellae (DS) for greater exposure affects pediatric midfacial growth.
From 2014 to 2020, the authors performed endoscopic endonasal surgery (EES) in 14 patients aged 12 years or younger. The lesions consisted of 11 cases of craniopharyngioma, 1 pituitary neuroendocrine tumor, 1 Rathke's cleft cyst, and 1 Langerhans cell histiocytosis. In 8 of the 14 cases, an extended EES procedure was used by exposing the SOS to remove the posterior clinoid process and DS. Measurement of the central face was based on head MRI before and after surgery. Measuring points were the sellae-nasion (SN) plane, the foremost points of the anterior maxilla (point A), and the maximum concavity point of the mandibular symphysis (point B). The authors measured and evaluated the SNA angle (angle created by the SN plane and the NA [a line connecting point A and the nasion] plane), SNB angle (angle created by the SN plane and the NB [a line connecting point B and the nasion] plane), and the ANB angle (angle created by the NA plane and the NB plane). In addition, a comparison was made with 6 pediatric cases in which transcranial surgery was performed for craniopharyngiomas.
In the extended EES group, the average preoperative age was 7 years, and the average postoperative age was 12 years. Mean preoperative angles in this group were 84° (SNA), 80.9° (SNB), and 3.1° (ANB); mean postoperative angles were 83.5° (SNA), 83.9° (SNB), and -0.4° (ANB). In the standard EES group, the average preoperative age was 9 years, and the average postoperative age was 14.5 years. Average preoperative angles in the standard EES group were 83° (SNA), 80.3° (SNB), and 2.7° (ANB); average postoperative angles were 82.7° (SNA), 81° (SNB), and 1.6° (ANB). In the transcranial surgery group, the average preoperative age was 4.5 years, and the average postoperative age was 9.8 years. Mean preoperative angles were 83.8° (SNA), 80.3° (SNB), and 3° (ANB); mean postoperative angles were 83.8° (SNA), 82.6° (SNB), and 1.2° (ANB). The only significant difference between groups was the postoperative ANB angle, which was negative in the extended EES group compared to the standard EES group, indicating the maxilla was positioned posteriorly compared to the mandible.
The measurement values of the EES groups and the transcranial surgery group exhibited minimal differences, except for a significant decrease in the postoperative ANB angle in the extended EES group compared with the standard EES group. These results show that extended EES may impact midface growth. Further research is required to understand the long-term impact of SOS exposure.
小儿扩大经鼻手术带来了重大的手术挑战。从鞍上区域到斜坡下部的病变需要广泛暴露。本研究探讨了钻开蝶枕软骨结合(SOS)以去除后床突和鞍背(DS)以获得更大暴露是否会影响小儿面中部生长。
2014年至2020年,作者对14例12岁及以下患者进行了鼻内镜手术(EES)。病变包括11例颅咽管瘤、1例垂体神经内分泌肿瘤、1例拉克氏囊肿和1例朗格汉斯细胞组织细胞增多症。在14例中的8例中,采用扩大EES手术,通过暴露SOS来去除后床突和DS。面中部测量基于手术前后的头部MRI。测量点为蝶鞍-鼻根(SN)平面、上颌前部最前点(A点)和下颌联合的最大凹陷点(B点)。作者测量并评估了SNA角(SN平面与NA [连接A点和鼻根的线]平面所形成的角)、SNB角(SN平面与NB [连接B点和鼻根的线]平面所形成的角)和ANB角(NA平面与NB平面所形成的角)。此外,与6例因颅咽管瘤接受开颅手术的小儿病例进行了比较。
在扩大EES组中,术前平均年龄为7岁,术后平均年龄为12岁。该组术前平均角度为84°(SNA)、80.9°(SNB)和3.1°(ANB);术后平均角度为83.5°(SNA)、83.9°(SNB)和 -0.4°(ANB)。在标准EES组中,术前平均年龄为9岁,术后平均年龄为14.5岁。标准EES组术前平均角度为83°(SNA)、80.3°(SNB)和2.7°(ANB);术后平均角度为82.7°(SNA)、81°(SNB)和1.6°(ANB)。在开颅手术组中,术前平均年龄为4.5岁,术后平均年龄为9.8岁。术前平均角度为83.8°(SNA)、80.3°(SNB)和3°(ANB);术后平均角度为83.8°(SNA)、82.6°(SNB)和1.2°(ANB)。各组之间唯一显著的差异是术后ANB角,扩大EES组与标准EES组相比为负值,表明上颌相对于下颌向后移位。
EES组和开颅手术组的测量值差异极小,除了扩大EES组与标准EES组相比术后ANB角显著减小。这些结果表明扩大EES可能影响面中部生长。需要进一步研究以了解暴露SOS的长期影响。