Suppr超能文献

颞叶癫痫患者的听觉处理:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Auditory processing in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki University Campus, Thessaloniki 54124, Greece.

CITY College, University of York, Europe Campus 3 Leontos Sofou st., Thessaloniki 546 26, Greece.

出版信息

Epilepsy Behav. 2024 Nov;160:110069. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2024.110069. Epub 2024 Oct 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hearing efficiency is known to influence and interact with communication and mental health. Hearing impairment may be hidden when co-occurring with neurological disorders.

PURPOSE

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis in order to address the following questions: 1) which specific tools of auditory processing show clear deficits, separating Temporal Lobe Epilepsy (TLE) patients from normal controls,2) How well is TLE evaluated in terms of hearing and auditory processing?

METHODS

The study inclusion criteria were: 1) patients diagnosed with temporal lobe epilepsy, 2) presence of a normal control group, 3) auditory processing assessment using auditory stimuli with behavioral tests and/or P300 or Mitch Match Negativity (MMN) latency and/or amplitude, 4) publications written in English, 5) publication date after 2000. 132 articles were retrieved and based on PRISMA & PICO criteria 23 articles were analyzed.

RESULTS

Temporal resolution and processing as measured by the behavioral tests of Gaps-In-Noise (GIN) and Duration Pattern Test (DPT) document deficiencies in TLE patients and separate them from normal controls. Electrophysiology as measured by MMN & P300 shows statistically significant differences in TLE patients compared to controls with patients showing deficient auditory processing. A clear difference between studies with psychoacoustic assessment as opposed to electrophysiology ones may be due to lacking or incomplete evaluation of peripheral hearing by gold standard tools (76.9% in electrophysiology studies).

CONCLUSION

Auditory processing is deficient in patients with TLE. There is a clear need to evaluate hearing efficiency before proceeding to auditory processing evaluation with behavioral or electrophysiological tests.

摘要

背景

听力效率已知会影响和交互沟通和心理健康。当与神经障碍同时发生时,听力损伤可能会被隐藏。

目的

我们进行了系统评价和荟萃分析,以回答以下问题:1)哪些特定的听觉处理工具显示出明显的缺陷,将颞叶癫痫(TLE)患者与正常对照组区分开来,2)TLE 在听力和听觉处理方面的评估如何?

方法

本研究的纳入标准为:1)诊断为颞叶癫痫的患者,2)存在正常对照组,3)使用听觉刺激进行听觉处理评估,并结合行为测试和/或 P300 或 Mitch 匹配负波(MMN)潜伏期和/或振幅,4)发表的文章为英文,5)发表日期在 2000 年以后。共检索到 132 篇文章,根据 PRISMA 和 PICO 标准,分析了 23 篇文章。

结果

TLE 患者的时间分辨率和处理能力,通过行为测试的噪声间隙(GIN)和持续模式测试(DPT)进行测量,显示出缺陷,并将其与正常对照组区分开来。电生理学,通过 MMN 和 P300 进行测量,显示出 TLE 患者与对照组之间存在统计学上显著的差异,患者的听觉处理能力较差。研究之间存在明显差异,与电生理学研究相比,心理声学评估研究可能是由于缺乏或不完全评估外周听力的黄金标准工具(电生理学研究中为 76.9%)。

结论

TLE 患者的听觉处理能力存在缺陷。在进行行为或电生理测试的听觉处理评估之前,明确需要评估听力效率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验