School of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Member of Menzies Health Institute Queensland Disability & Rehabilitation center, Gold Coast, Australia.
Brisbane Australia, Australia.
J Dent. 2024 Dec;151:105389. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105389. Epub 2024 Oct 10.
The accuracy of the intaglio surface of maxillary complete dentures produced with a variety of digital manufacturing systems have been comprehensively investigated, however, not for multiple systems in the same study. This in vitro study endeavors to measure and compare the accuracy of the intaglio surface of maxillary complete denture bases constructed with different photopolymerization-based 3D printing and CNC milling systems.
Two subtractive manufacturing machines and five additive manufacturing machines were used to manufacture a maxillary denture bases (n = 10) for analysis. The samples were stored in artificial saliva at 37 °C for 7 days to mimic intraoral use before they were air dried for 5 min, and then scanned with an E3 dental laboratory scanner to generate STL files. A 3D metrology software program was used to analyze the data against the original CAD design. Statistical differences were determined with 1-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Kruskal Wallis test (α=0.05). Color deviation heat maps were used to interpret areas of clinical significance.
The results indicated that the subtractive manufacturing method delivers the truest and most precise intaglio surface of maxillary complete denture bases. The additive manufacturing technique delivers less true and less precise results with inconsistency observed between the different systems as opposed to the subtractive manufacturing groups which showed no significant differences.
When manufacturing a complete maxillary denture base subtractive manufacturing will deliver the most consistent and true results.
已经全面研究了各种数字化制造系统制作的上颌全口义齿凹面的精度,但尚未在同一研究中对多个系统进行研究。本体外研究旨在测量和比较使用不同光聚合 3D 打印和数控铣削系统构建的上颌全口义齿基托凹面的精度。
使用两种减材制造机器和五种增材制造机器来制造上颌义齿基托(n=10)进行分析。将样本在 37°C 的人工唾液中储存 7 天,以模拟口内使用情况,然后在空气中干燥 5 分钟,然后使用 E3 牙科实验室扫描仪进行扫描,以生成 STL 文件。使用 3D 计量软件程序根据原始 CAD 设计分析数据。使用单向方差分析(ANOVA)和 Kruskal Wallis 检验(α=0.05)确定统计差异。颜色偏差热图用于解释具有临床意义的区域。
结果表明,减法制造方法提供了最真实,最精确的上颌全口义齿基托凹面。与减法制造组相比,加法制造技术的结果不够真实,不够精确,并且不同系统之间存在不一致性,而减法制造组则没有显示出明显的差异。
在制造完整的上颌全口义齿基托时,减法制造将提供最一致和最真实的结果。