Laboratory of Analytical Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Zografou, 15771 Athens, Greece.
Laboratory of Analytical Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Zografou, 15771 Athens, Greece.
Sci Total Environ. 2024 Dec 10;955:176768. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.176768. Epub 2024 Oct 10.
Molecular-based assays are the most commonly used methods for the detection and quantification of viruses in wastewater. The variety of inhibitory substances present in the complex matrix of wastewater hinders downstream analysis and often leads to false negative results and underestimation of viral load. The development of robust and inhibitor-tolerant detection methods is necessary in the context of wastewater-based epidemiology, a valuable tool that has gained further importance since the emergence of the Covid-19 pandemic. Various strategies are used to mitigate inhibition in the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with the most prevalent of all: the dilution of the sample and the inhibitor removal kits. In this study, we first indicated the presence of inhibitors in wastewater samples and the evaluation of eight different PCR enhancing strategies were further performed using reverse-transcription PCR (RT-qPCR) protocol. False negative results were eliminated through four approaches evaluated, a 10-fold dilution of the extracted sample, addition of T4 gene 32 protein (gp32), addition of Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA), and using an inhibitor removal kit. Among the methods that removed inhibition, the most significant for the removal of inhibition was the addition of gp32 (at a final concentration 0.2 μg/μl). This optimized protocol was further applied to wastewater samples tested for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and a direct comparison study was further performed with reverse-transcription droplet digital PCR (RT-ddPCR). The detection frequency of both methods was 100 % and the obtained viral concentrations were higher by RT-ddPCR; the optimized RT-qPCR assay showed a good correlation (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient: 0,713, p-value <0,007) with RT-ddPCR. This is the first study to directly compare common strategies for eliminating inhibition in wastewater and demonstrates the importance of developing robust assays to accurately assess the recovery rates and viral loads of the targets tested, in a simple, cost-effective and high-throughput manner.
基于分子的检测方法是检测和定量废水中病毒最常用的方法。废水复杂基质中存在的各种抑制物质会阻碍下游分析,并且经常导致假阴性结果和病毒载量的低估。在基于废水的流行病学中,开发稳健且耐受抑制剂的检测方法是必要的,这是一种有价值的工具,自新冠疫情出现以来,其重要性进一步得到了提高。在聚合酶链反应(PCR)中,有多种策略用于减轻抑制作用,其中最常见的策略是:稀释样品和抑制剂去除试剂盒。在本研究中,我们首先指出了废水中存在抑制剂,并进一步使用逆转录 PCR(RT-qPCR)方案评估了八种不同的增强 PCR 策略。通过评估的四种方法消除了假阴性结果,包括对提取样品进行 10 倍稀释、添加 T4 基因 32 蛋白(gp32)、添加牛血清白蛋白(BSA)和使用抑制剂去除试剂盒。在消除抑制的方法中,最有效的方法是添加 gp32(最终浓度为 0.2μg/μl)。进一步将优化后的方案应用于检测严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)的废水样本,并进一步进行了与逆转录液滴数字 PCR(RT-ddPCR)的直接比较研究。两种方法的检测频率均为 100%,RT-ddPCR 检测到的病毒浓度更高;优化后的 RT-qPCR 检测方法与 RT-ddPCR 具有良好的相关性(组内相关系数:0.713,p 值<0.007)。这是首次直接比较消除废水中抑制的常用策略的研究,证明了开发稳健的检测方法的重要性,这些方法可以以简单、经济高效和高通量的方式准确评估目标物的回收率和病毒载量。