Suppr超能文献

帕博利珠单抗联合化疗治疗晚期和复发性宫颈癌:根据随机KEYNOTE-826研究中贝伐单抗使用情况的最终分析

Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy for advanced and recurrent cervical cancer: final analysis according to bevacizumab use in the randomized KEYNOTE-826 study.

作者信息

Lorusso D, Colombo N, Dubot C, Cáceres M V, Hasegawa K, Shapira-Frommer R, Salman P, Yañez E, Gümüş M, Olivera M, Samouëlian V, Castonguay V, Arkhipov A, Li K, Toker S, Tekin C, Tewari K S, Monk B J

机构信息

Gynaecology Oncology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.

Gynecologic Oncology Program, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Ann Oncol. 2025 Jan;36(1):65-75. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2024.10.002. Epub 2024 Oct 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In KEYNOTE-826 (NCT03635567), pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy (±bevacizumab) significantly improved overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer. This exploratory analysis examined outcomes in patient subgroups defined by bevacizumab use.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible adult patients had persistent, recurrent, or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma, adenosquamous carcinoma, or adenocarcinoma of the cervix not previously treated with chemotherapy and not amenable to curative treatment; measurable disease per RECIST v1.1; and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤1. Patients were randomly allocated 1 : 1 to pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks or placebo for up to 35 cycles plus chemotherapy (±bevacizumab 15 mg/kg). Dual primary endpoints were OS and PFS per RECIST v1.1 by investigator assessment. Outcomes were assessed in subgroups defined by bevacizumab use. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were based on a stratified Cox regression model.

RESULTS

A total of 617 patients were randomly assigned [pembrolizumab arm, n = 308 (63.6% with bevacizumab); placebo arm, n = 309 (62.5% with bevacizumab)]. The most common reason for bevacizumab exclusion was medical contraindication (75.9%). Among patients who received bevacizumab, HRs (95% CIs) for PFS favored the pembrolizumab arm in the programmed cell death-ligand 1 combined positive score ≥1 [0.56 (0.43-0.73)] and all-comer [0.57 (0.45-0.73)] populations; OS results were 0.60 (0.45-0.79) and 0.61 (0.47-0.80), respectively. Among patients who did not receive bevacizumab, HRs (95% CIs) for PFS also favored the pembrolizumab arm in the programmed cell death-ligand 1 combined positive score ≥1 [0.61 (0.44-0.85)] and all-comer [0.69 (0.50-0.94)] populations; OS results were 0.61 (0.44-0.85) and 0.67 (0.49-0.91), respectively. Among patients who received bevacizumab, grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 74.0% of patients in the pembrolizumab arm and 66.8% in the placebo arm.

CONCLUSION

Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy prolonged PFS and OS and had manageable safety compared with placebo plus chemotherapy in patient subgroups defined by bevacizumab use.

摘要

背景

在KEYNOTE-826(NCT03635567)试验中,帕博利珠单抗联合化疗(±贝伐单抗)显著改善了持续性、复发性或转移性宫颈癌患者的总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)。本探索性分析研究了根据贝伐单抗使用情况定义的患者亚组的预后。

患者和方法

符合条件的成年患者患有持续性、复发性或转移性鳞状细胞癌、腺鳞癌或宫颈腺癌,此前未接受过化疗且不适合根治性治疗;根据RECIST v1.1标准有可测量病灶;东部肿瘤协作组体能状态评分为≤1。患者按1:1随机分配,每3周接受200mg帕博利珠单抗或安慰剂,最多35个周期,同时接受化疗(±15mg/kg贝伐单抗)。双重主要终点是研究者根据RECIST v1.1标准评估的OS和PFS。在根据贝伐单抗使用情况定义的亚组中评估预后。风险比(HR)和95%置信区间(CI)基于分层Cox回归模型。

结果

共随机分配了617例患者[帕博利珠单抗组,n = 308(63.6%使用贝伐单抗);安慰剂组,n = 309(62.5%使用贝伐单抗)]。排除贝伐单抗的最常见原因是医学禁忌(75.9%)。在接受贝伐单抗的患者中,在程序性死亡配体1联合阳性评分≥1[0.56(0.43 - 0.73)]和所有患者[0.57(0.45 - 0.73)]人群中,帕博利珠单抗组PFS的HR(95%CI)更有利;OS结果分别为0.60(0.45 - 0.79)和0.61(0.47 - 0.80)。在未接受贝伐单抗的患者中,在程序性死亡配体1联合阳性评分≥1[0.61(0.44 - 0.85)]和所有患者[0.69(0.50 - 0.94)]人群中,帕博利珠单抗组PFS的HR(95%CI)也更有利;OS结果分别为0.61(0.44 - 0.85)和0.67(0.49 - 0.91)。在接受贝伐单抗的患者中,帕博利珠单抗组74.0%的患者发生了≥3级治疗相关不良事件,安慰剂组为66.8%。

结论

在根据贝伐单抗使用情况定义的患者亚组中,与安慰剂联合化疗相比,帕博利珠单抗联合化疗延长了PFS和OS,且安全性可控。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验