• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

园艺疗法对无痴呆症老年人的有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Effectiveness of Horticultural Therapy in Older Adults without Dementia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation Services, Khoo Teck Puat Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.

Department of Nursing, Khoo Teck Puat Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.

出版信息

J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2024 Dec;25(12):105296. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105296. Epub 2024 Oct 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105296
PMID:39393785
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Horticultural therapy (HT) has garnered growing interest because of its psychological and physical benefits. Previous reviews have demonstrated its therapeutic effects in older adults with cognitive impairment or mental illnesses. However, its impact on older adults without dementia has not been synthesized. This systematic review studied the effects of HT on the physical and psychosocial functions of older adults without dementia.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

SETTINGS AND PARTICIPANTS

Older adults without dementia ≥60 years of age.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies were systematically searched in 7 databases. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool version 2 and the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions tool were used to assess study quality. A random-effects meta-analysis with Hedges' g was conducted to estimate the effect size, and Cochran's Q test and I were used to evaluate heterogeneity. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach was applied to determine the overall quality of evidence.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven studies, including 11 randomized controlled trials and 16 quasi-experimental studies comprising 1629 older adults from 11 countries, were included. HT tended to improve psychosocial outcomes in older adults, particularly in terms of self-efficacy (g = 0.52; 95% CI, 0.26-0.79) and self-esteem (g = 0.52; 95% CI, 0.26-0.79). In terms of physical benefits, HT appeared to have a greater impact on aerobic endurance, with a large effect size (g = 0.84; 95% CI, 0.54-1.15), compared to agility, which showed a smaller effect size (g = 0.45; 95% CI, -0.90 to -0.01).

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

This review demonstrated that HT could provide psychosocial and physical benefits to older adults without dementia. These benefits include slight improvements in self-efficacy, self-esteem, aerobic endurance, and agility. However, the certainty of this evidence is very low due to the quasi-experimental design and potential bias in outcome measurements. Further research with well-designed clinical trials is necessary to confirm its effectiveness.

摘要

目的

园艺疗法(horticultural therapy,HT)因其具有心理和生理益处而受到越来越多的关注。先前的综述已经证明了其在认知障碍或精神疾病的老年患者中的治疗效果。然而,其对没有痴呆的老年人的影响尚未得到综合评估。本系统综述研究了 HT 对没有痴呆的老年人的身体和社会心理功能的影响。

设计

系统综述和荟萃分析。

设置和参与者

年龄≥ 60 岁的没有痴呆的老年人。

方法

系统检索了 7 个数据库中的随机对照试验和准实验研究。使用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具 2 版和干预措施非随机研究偏倚风险工具评估研究质量。采用随机效应荟萃分析和 Hedges' g 估计效应大小,并采用 Cochran's Q 检验和 I²评估异质性。应用推荐评估、制定与评价分级方法评估证据的总体质量。

结果

纳入了 27 项研究,包括 11 项随机对照试验和 16 项准实验研究,涉及来自 11 个国家的 1629 名老年人。HT 倾向于改善老年人的社会心理结局,尤其是在自我效能感(g = 0.52;95%CI,0.26-0.79)和自尊(g = 0.52;95%CI,0.26-0.79)方面。在身体获益方面,HT 似乎对有氧运动耐力的影响更大,效应量较大(g = 0.84;95%CI,0.54-1.15),而对敏捷性的影响较小,效应量较小(g = 0.45;95%CI,-0.90 至 -0.01)。

结论和意义

本综述表明,HT 可以为没有痴呆的老年人提供社会心理和身体方面的益处。这些益处包括自我效能感、自尊、有氧运动耐力和敏捷性的轻微改善。然而,由于准实验设计和结局测量的潜在偏倚,该证据的确信度非常低。需要进一步开展设计良好的临床试验来证实其有效性。

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of Horticultural Therapy in Older Adults without Dementia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.园艺疗法对无痴呆症老年人的有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2024 Dec;25(12):105296. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105296. Epub 2024 Oct 9.
2
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.成人全身麻醉后预防术后恶心呕吐的药物:网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.
3
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
4
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.
5
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
6
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
7
Music interventions for improving psychological and physical outcomes in people with cancer.音乐干预对改善癌症患者心理和生理结局的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 12;10(10):CD006911. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006911.pub4.
8
Interventions for promoting habitual exercise in people living with and beyond cancer.促进癌症患者及康复者进行习惯性锻炼的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 19;9(9):CD010192. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010192.pub3.
9
Psychological therapies for panic disorder with or without agoraphobia in adults: a network meta-analysis.成人伴或不伴有广场恐惧症的惊恐障碍的心理治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 13;4(4):CD011004. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011004.pub2.
10
Psychological and educational interventions for preventing falls in older people living in the community.社区居住老年人预防跌倒的心理和教育干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Oct 3;10(10):CD013480. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013480.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Nature-based interventions: a systematic review of reviews.基于自然的干预措施:综述的系统评价
Front Psychol. 2025 Aug 8;16:1625294. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1625294. eCollection 2025.