• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

了解在南非注册的创新药物的药物获取策略。

Understanding medicine access strategies for innovator medicines registered in South Africa.

机构信息

Discipline of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal (Westville Campus), Private Bag X54001, Durban, KwaZulu- Natal, 4000, South Africa.

School of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal (Westville Campus), Private Bag X54001, Durban, KwaZulu-Natal, 4000, South Africa.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Oct 11;24(1):1220. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11696-4.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-024-11696-4
PMID:39394111
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11468095/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

South Africa is composed of a two-tier healthcare system. One tier is a private healthcare system that is funded through medical insurance, and comprised of people who can afford to make monthly payments towards their medical insurance. Second tier is a government-funded public healthcare system, which covers the majority of the population. This study explored the perceived barriers and current strategies being utilised by the pharmaceutical industry to increase access to innovator medicines.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of the study were to: (1) quantify and classify innovator medicines registered between 2010 and 2020 by the South African Health Products Regulatory Authority (SAHPRA); (2) identify barriers to accessing innovator medicines in South Africa through interviews with market access managers from innovator companies; and (3) explore the current market access strategies used by the pharmaceutical industry.

DESIGN

This study employed a quantitative and qualitative methodology. Whereby the former involved the extraction of a list of innovator medicines from the regulator database, and the latter involved 9 semi structured interviews. Purposive sampling was conducted through pharmaceutical association member companies. The interviews included seven market access managers and two medicine managers from one of the payers in South Africa. Thematic analysis was used to interpret the data collected from the study.

RESULTS

According to the regulator database during the review period, 238 innovator medicines were registered. Only 14.77% were available in the public sector in the form of tenders, whereas in the private sector (based on the products having a SEP), 76.92% were available. From the interviews six themes emerged: reimbursement of medicines, types of reimbursement, partnerships, technology, legislative challenges, and other factors (e.g., real-world evidence).

CONCLUSION

Access to innovator medicines in South Africa is a challenge, as the price of these therapies is high. Therefore, various stakeholders in the health sector must collaborate to identify and implement solutions that are locally relevant. The government needs to proactively update policies that would allow for alternative reimbursement methods to be explored.

摘要

背景

南非由两级医疗保健系统组成。一个层级是通过医疗保险为其提供资金的私立医疗保健系统,由有能力支付医疗保险月费的人群组成。第二个层级是由政府提供资金的公立医疗保健系统,为大多数人提供服务。本研究探讨了制药行业为增加创新药物的可及性而感知到的障碍和当前所采用的策略。

目的

本研究的目的是:(1)量化并分类南非卫生产品监管局(SAHPRA)在 2010 年至 2020 年间注册的创新药物;(2)通过采访创新型制药公司的市场准入经理,了解在南非获得创新药物的障碍;(3)探索制药行业目前采用的市场准入策略。

设计

本研究采用了定量和定性的方法。前者涉及从监管机构数据库中提取创新药物清单,后者涉及 9 次半结构化访谈。通过制药协会成员公司进行了有针对性的抽样。访谈包括南非一家支付方的 7 位市场准入经理和 2 位药品经理。使用主题分析来解释从研究中收集的数据。

结果

根据审查期间的监管机构数据库,共有 238 种创新药物注册。只有 14.77%的药物以招标的形式在公共部门供应,而在私人部门(基于产品具有特殊条件),有 76.92%的药物供应。从访谈中得出了六个主题:药品报销、报销类型、伙伴关系、技术、立法挑战和其他因素(如真实世界证据)。

结论

南非获得创新药物存在挑战,因为这些疗法的价格很高。因此,卫生部门的各个利益相关者必须合作,确定并实施符合当地情况的解决方案。政府需要积极更新政策,以允许探索替代报销方法。

相似文献

1
Understanding medicine access strategies for innovator medicines registered in South Africa.了解在南非注册的创新药物的药物获取策略。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Oct 11;24(1):1220. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11696-4.
2
Trends in the utilization of medicines sold in the private sector post- registration in South Africa and the implications for similar countries.南非药品注册后在私营部门的使用趋势及对类似国家的影响。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Jan 28;23(1):192. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15021-2.
3
Parents' and guardians' perceptions on availability and pricing of medicines and healthcare for children in eThekwini, South Africa - a qualitative study.南非伊特夸维尼地区父母及监护人对儿童药品及医疗保健可及性与价格的看法——一项定性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jun 19;17(1):417. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2385-y.
4
The role of insurance in the achievement of universal coverage within a developing country context: South Africa as a case study.发展中国家实现全民覆盖背景下的保险作用:以南非为例。
BMC Public Health. 2012;12 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S5. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-S1-S5. Epub 2012 Jun 22.
5
Alignment in the registration, selection, procurement and reimbursement of essential medicines for childhood cancers in South Africa.南非儿童癌症基本药物注册、遴选、采购和报销的一致性。
BMJ Glob Health. 2023 Sep;8(9). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-012309.
6
Bioequivalence Common Deficiencies in Generic Products Submitted for Registration to the South African Health Products Regulatory Authority (SAHPRA).南非卫生产品监管局(SAHPRA)注册的仿制药常见缺陷。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2022 Sep;56(5):822-838. doi: 10.1007/s43441-022-00429-6. Epub 2022 Jul 27.
7
Quality of generic medicines in South Africa: perceptions versus reality - a qualitative study.南非仿制药质量:认知与现实——一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Sep 3;12:297. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-297.
8
Evaluating the impact of single exit pricing (SEP) on medicine product withdrawal from the private healthcare market in South Africa.评估单一退出定价(SEP)对南非药品退出私营医疗市场的影响。
S Afr Med J. 2021 Apr 30;111(5):444-447. doi: 10.7196/SAMJ.2021.v111i5.15297.
9
Assessing the prices and affordability of oncology medicines for three common cancers within the private sector of South Africa.评估南非私营部门三种常见癌症的肿瘤药物价格和可负担性。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jul 6;21(1):661. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06627-6.
10
Availability and acceptability of HIV counselling and testing services. A qualitative study comparing clients' experiences of accessing HIV testing at public sector primary health care facilities or non-governmental mobile services in Cape Town, South Africa.艾滋病毒咨询与检测服务的可及性与可接受性。一项定性研究,比较南非开普敦公共部门初级卫生保健机构或非政府流动服务机构中客户进行艾滋病毒检测的经历。
BMC Public Health. 2015 Sep 2;15:845. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2173-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Key drivers of investment initiatives in Uganda's pharmaceutical industry.乌干达制药业投资计划的关键驱动因素。
Soc Sci Med. 2024 Mar;344:116558. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.116558. Epub 2024 Jan 6.
2
Why are our medicines so expensive? Spoiler: Not for the reasons you are being told….为什么我们的药品这么贵?有内幕:原因跟你听说的不一样……
Eur J Gen Pract. 2024 Dec;30(1):2308006. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2024.2308006. Epub 2024 Feb 1.
3
Value-based Reimbursement as a Mechanism to Achieve Social and Financial Impact in the Healthcare System.基于价值的报销作为在医疗保健系统中实现社会和财务影响的一种机制。
J Health Econ Outcomes Res. 2023 Oct 31;10(2):100-103. doi: 10.36469/001c.89151. eCollection 2023.
4
The Implementation of a Risk-Based Assessment Approach by the South African Health Products Regulatory Authority (SAHPRA).南非卫生产品监管局(SAHPRA)实施基于风险的评估方法。
Pharmaceut Med. 2023 Jan;37(1):71-91. doi: 10.1007/s40290-022-00452-w. Epub 2023 Jan 4.
5
Financing and Reimbursement Models for Personalised Medicine: A Systematic Review to Identify Current Models and Future Options.个性化医学的融资和报销模式:系统评价以确定当前模式和未来选择。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2022 Jul;20(4):501-524. doi: 10.1007/s40258-021-00714-9. Epub 2022 Apr 4.
6
Evaluating the impact of single exit pricing (SEP) on medicine product withdrawal from the private healthcare market in South Africa.评估单一退出定价(SEP)对南非药品退出私营医疗市场的影响。
S Afr Med J. 2021 Apr 30;111(5):444-447. doi: 10.7196/SAMJ.2021.v111i5.15297.
7
Product patents and access to innovative medicines.产品专利与创新药物的可及性。
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Dec;291:114479. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114479. Epub 2021 Oct 9.
8
Assessing the prices and affordability of oncology medicines for three common cancers within the private sector of South Africa.评估南非私营部门三种常见癌症的肿瘤药物价格和可负担性。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jul 6;21(1):661. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06627-6.
9
Value-based pricing for advanced therapy medicinal products: emerging affordability solutions.基于价值的先进治疗药物定价:新兴的负担能力解决方案。
Eur J Health Econ. 2022 Mar;23(2):155-163. doi: 10.1007/s10198-021-01276-2. Epub 2021 Jun 9.
10
Availability, Affordability, Access, and Pricing of Anti-cancer Medicines in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review of Literature.中低收入国家抗癌药物的可及性、可负担性、可获得性和定价:文献系统评价。
Front Public Health. 2021 Apr 30;9:628744. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.628744. eCollection 2021.