• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估南非私营部门三种常见癌症的肿瘤药物价格和可负担性。

Assessing the prices and affordability of oncology medicines for three common cancers within the private sector of South Africa.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, University of Huddersfield, Queensgate, Huddersfield, HD1 3DH, UK.

Discipline of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Westville Campus, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Private Bag X54001, Durban, 4000, South Africa.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jul 6;21(1):661. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06627-6.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-021-06627-6
PMID:34229693
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8259378/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Prices of cancer medicines are a major contributor to the cost of treatment for cancer patients and the comparison of these cost needs to be assessed.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the prices of cancer medicines for the three most common cancers ((breast, prostate and colorectal) in the private healthcare sector of South Africa.

METHODS

The methodology was adapted from the World Health Organization (WHO)/ Health Action International (HAI) methodology for measuring medicine prices. The Single Exit Price (SEP) variations between product types of the same medicine between the highest- and lowest-priced product and between Originator Brand (OB) and its Lowest Priced Generic (LPG) of the same medicine brand was compared, as of March 2020. The affordability of those medicines for cancer usage based on treatment affordability in relation to the daily wage of the unskilled Lowest-Paid Government Worker (LPGW) was also determined. Also, a comparison of the proportion of the population below the poverty line (PL) before (I) and after (I) procurement of the cancer medicines was determined.

RESULTS

SEP Price differences ranged from 25.46 to 97.33% between highest- and lowest-priced products and a price variation of 72.09% more for the OB than the LPG medicine, except for one LPG that was more expensive than the OB. Affordability calculations showed that All OB treatments for all three cancers (breast, prostate and colorectal), except for paclitaxel 300 mg (0.2 days wage) and Fluorouracil (Fluroblastin) 500 mg (0.3 days wage) costs respectively were more than 1 day's wage, with patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer needing 32.5 days wages in order to afford a standard course of treatment for a month.

CONCLUSION

There was a considerable variation in the price of different brands of cancer medicines available in the South African private sector.

摘要

背景

癌症药物的价格是癌症患者治疗费用的主要组成部分,需要对这些成本进行比较。

目的

评估南非私立医疗保健领域三种最常见癌症(乳腺癌、前列腺癌和结直肠癌)的癌症药物价格。

方法

该方法改编自世界卫生组织(WHO)/国际健康行动(HAI)用于衡量药物价格的方法。比较了同一药物不同产品类型之间最高和最低价格产品之间的单一出口价格(SEP)差异,以及同一药物品牌的原研药(OB)与其最便宜的仿制药(LPG)之间的差异,截至 2020 年 3 月。还根据非熟练政府最低工资工人(LPGW)的日工资与癌症治疗负担能力之间的关系,确定了这些癌症药物的可负担性。此外,还确定了在采购癌症药物之前(I)和之后(I),处于贫困线以下的人口比例(PL)的变化。

结果

最高和最低价格产品之间的 SEP 价格差异范围为 25.46%至 97.33%,OB 药物比 LPG 药物的价格差异为 72.09%,但有一种 LPG 药物比 OB 药物更贵。负担能力计算显示,所有三种癌症(乳腺癌、前列腺癌和结直肠癌)的所有 OB 治疗方法(紫杉醇 300mg(0.2 天工资)和氟尿嘧啶(氟罗他汀)500mg(0.3 天工资)除外)的费用均超过 1 天工资,诊断为结直肠癌的患者需要 32.5 天的工资才能负担一个月的标准治疗费用。

结论

南非私立部门提供的不同品牌癌症药物的价格存在相当大的差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8168/8259378/621e3d5368cd/12913_2021_6627_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8168/8259378/621e3d5368cd/12913_2021_6627_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8168/8259378/621e3d5368cd/12913_2021_6627_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessing the prices and affordability of oncology medicines for three common cancers within the private sector of South Africa.评估南非私营部门三种常见癌症的肿瘤药物价格和可负担性。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jul 6;21(1):661. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06627-6.
2
Evaluation of prices, availability and affordability of essential medicines in Lahore Division, Pakistan: A cross-sectional survey using WHO/HAI methodology.巴基斯坦拉合尔分部基本药物的价格、可及性和可负担性评估:使用世卫组织/卫生技术评估机构方法的横断面调查。
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 25;14(4):e0216122. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216122. eCollection 2019.
3
A comprehensive survey of cancer medicines prices, availability and affordability in Ghana.加纳癌症药物价格、可及性和可负担性的综合调查。
PLoS One. 2023 May 3;18(5):e0279817. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279817. eCollection 2023.
4
Price, availability and affordability of medicines.药品的价格、可获得性和可承受性。
Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2014 Jun 24;6(1):E1-6. doi: 10.4102/phcfm.v6i1.604.
5
Measuring access to medicines: a survey of prices, availability and affordability in Shaanxi province of China.衡量药品可及性:中国陕西省药品价格、可及性和可负担性调查。
PLoS One. 2013 Aug 1;8(8):e70836. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070836. Print 2013.
6
Availability, pricing and affordability of selected medicines for noncommunicable diseases.某些非传染性疾病药物的供应、定价和可负担性。
East Mediterr Health J. 2019 Oct 4;25(7):473-480. doi: 10.26719/emhj.18.068.
7
Measuring Availability, Prices and Affordability of Ischaemic Heart Disease Medicines in Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia.马来西亚雪兰莪州班吉地区缺血性心脏病药物的可及性、价格与可负担性测量
Malays J Med Sci. 2019 Sep;26(5):113-121. doi: 10.21315/mjms2019.26.5.10. Epub 2019 Nov 4.
8
Relationship between pharmaceutical pricing strategies with price, availability, and affordability of cardiovascular disease medicines: surveys in Qatar and Lebanon.心血管病药物的定价策略与价格、可及性和可负担性之间的关系:在卡塔尔和黎巴嫩的调查。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Dec 18;19(1):973. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4828-0.
9
Availability, prices and affordability of essential medicines: A cross-sectional survey in Hanam province, Vietnam.基本药物的可及性、价格和可负担性:越南河静省的横断面调查。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 18;16(11):e0260142. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260142. eCollection 2021.
10
Availability, prices and affordability of selected essential medicines in Jordan: a national survey.约旦特定基本药物的可及性、价格及可负担性:一项全国性调查
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Oct 19;18(1):787. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3593-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in the Treatment for Head and Neck Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.免疫检查点抑制剂治疗头颈癌患者的疗效:一项系统评价与网状Meta分析
Oncol Res. 2025 Aug 28;33(9):2263-2278. doi: 10.32604/or.2025.065911. eCollection 2025.
2
Plant-Derived Anti-Cancer Therapeutics and Biopharmaceuticals.植物源抗癌治疗药物与生物制药
Bioengineering (Basel). 2024 Dec 25;12(1):7. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering12010007.
3
Understanding medicine access strategies for innovator medicines registered in South Africa.

本文引用的文献

1
Ten recommendations to improve pharmacy practice in low and middle-income countries (LMICs).改善低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)药学实践的十条建议。
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2021 Jan 6;14(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s40545-020-00288-2.
2
Evaluating access to essential medicines for treating childhood cancers: a medicines availability, price and affordability study in New Delhi, India.评估治疗儿童癌症基本药物的可及性:印度新德里的药物可获得性、价格及可负担性研究
BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Apr 23;4(2):e001379. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-001379. eCollection 2019.
3
Availability and affordability of biologic versus non-biologic anticancer medicines: a cross-sectional study in Punjab, Pakistan.
了解在南非注册的创新药物的药物获取策略。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Oct 11;24(1):1220. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11696-4.
4
Quality of Life in Female Breast Cancer Patients and Survivors in a South African Municipality.南非某城市女性乳腺癌患者及幸存者的生活质量
Breast Cancer (Auckl). 2024 Oct 8;18:11782234241282519. doi: 10.1177/11782234241282519. eCollection 2024.
5
The financial burden of noncommunicable diseases from out-of-pocket expenditure in sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review.撒哈拉以南非洲地区非传染性疾病自付费用的经济负担:一项范围综述
Health Promot Int. 2024 Oct 1;39(5). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daae114.
6
Access to childhood cancer medicines in South Africa: a health systems analysis of barriers and enablers.南非儿童癌症药物的可及性:对障碍与促进因素的卫生系统分析
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2024 Jul 12;17(1):2372033. doi: 10.1080/20523211.2024.2372033. eCollection 2024.
7
Biochemical progression free and overall survival among Black men with stage IV prostate cancer in South Africa: Results from a prospective cohort study.南非 IV 期前列腺癌黑人男性的生化无进展生存期和总生存期:一项前瞻性队列研究的结果。
Cancer Med. 2024 Jan;13(1):e6739. doi: 10.1002/cam4.6739. Epub 2023 Dec 29.
8
Barriers and Facilitators of Adherence to Oral Anticancer Medications Among Women with Breast Cancer: A Qualitative Study.乳腺癌女性口服抗癌药物依从性的障碍与促进因素:一项定性研究
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2023 Nov 6;17:2821-2839. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S416843. eCollection 2023.
9
Alignment in the registration, selection, procurement and reimbursement of essential medicines for childhood cancers in South Africa.南非儿童癌症基本药物注册、遴选、采购和报销的一致性。
BMJ Glob Health. 2023 Sep;8(9). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-012309.
10
Automatic detection and classification of lung cancer CT scans based on deep learning and ebola optimization search algorithm.基于深度学习和埃博拉优化搜索算法的肺癌 CT 扫描自动检测和分类。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 17;18(8):e0285796. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285796. eCollection 2023.
生物抗癌药物与非生物抗癌药物的可及性和可负担性:巴基斯坦旁遮普省的一项横断面研究
BMJ Open. 2018 Jun 14;8(6):e019015. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019015.
4
Availability of anticancer medicines in public and private sectors, and their affordability by low, middle and high-income class patients in Pakistan.在巴基斯坦,公共和私营部门抗癌药物的供应情况,以及低收入、中等收入和高收入阶层患者的负担能力。
BMC Cancer. 2018 Jan 3;18(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3980-3.
5
Pricing appraisal of anti-cancer drugs in the South East Asian, Western Pacific and East Mediterranean Region.东南亚、西太平洋和东地中海地区抗肿瘤药物的定价评估。
BMC Cancer. 2017 Dec 28;17(1):903. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3888-y.
6
A global comparison of the cost of patented cancer drugs in relation to global differences in wealth.专利抗癌药物成本与全球财富差异的全球比较。
Oncotarget. 2017 May 9;8(42):71548-71555. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.17742. eCollection 2017 Sep 22.
7
ESMO International Consortium Study on the availability, out-of-pocket costs and accessibility of antineoplastic medicines in countries outside of Europe.欧洲肿瘤内科学会国际联盟关于欧洲以外国家抗肿瘤药物的可及性、自付费用和可获得性的研究
Ann Oncol. 2017 Nov 1;28(11):2633-2647. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx521.
8
Country and regional variations in purchase prices for essential cancer medications.基本癌症药物采购价格的国家和地区差异。
BMC Cancer. 2017 Aug 24;17(1):566. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3553-5.
9
Variation of Cost among Anti-cancer Drugs Available in Indian Market.印度市场上抗癌药物的成本差异
J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Nov;10(11):FC17-FC20. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/22384.8918. Epub 2016 Nov 1.
10
Attacking 'prejudice' against generics could save SA billions.消除对仿制药的“偏见”可为南非节省数十亿美元。
S Afr Med J. 2015 Dec;105(12):1004-5. doi: 10.7196/samj.2015.v105i12.10317.