• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

微创联合内侧和外侧入路治疗移位肩胛体颈骨折。

Minimally Invasive Combined Medial and Lateral Approach for Treating Displaced Scapular Body and Neck Fractures.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, Suzhou Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.

Department of Orthopedics, Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.

出版信息

Med Sci Monit. 2024 Oct 12;30:e945535. doi: 10.12659/MSM.945535.

DOI:10.12659/MSM.945535
PMID:39394682
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11481811/
Abstract

BACKGROUND Traditional open surgery for displaced scapular body and neck fractures often results in significant trauma and complications. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of a combined medial and lateral minimally invasive approach compared with the traditional Judet approach. MATERIAL AND METHODS A retrospective analysis was conducted on 36 patients (22 men, 14 women; mean age 45.6 years) with displaced scapular body and neck fractures treated between May 2016 and May 2022. Nineteen patients underwent the minimally invasive approach, while 17 received the traditional Judet approach. Primary outcomes included surgical incision length, intraoperative blood loss, complication rate, time to postoperative pain relief (VAS score ≤3), and Constant-Murley shoulder score at 12 months. Statistical analysis was done using the t test and chi-square test. RESULTS The minimally invasive group had shorter incision lengths (mean difference: 10.0 cm; 95% CI: 8.1-11.9; P<0.001) and lower blood loss (mean difference: 129.4 mL; 95% CI: 119.0-139.8; P<0.001). They also experienced faster pain relief (mean difference: 3.0 days; 95% CI: 2.5-3.5; P<0.001) and higher Constant-Murley scores (mean difference: 7.4 points; 95% CI: 4.9-9.9; P<0.001). There were no significant differences in operative duration or fracture healing time. CONCLUSIONS The combined medial and lateral minimally invasive approach offers superior outcomes in reducing incision length, blood loss, complications, and pain, with enhanced shoulder function, making it a safe and effective alternative to the traditional Judet approach.

摘要

背景

传统的开放式手术治疗移位肩胛体和颈部骨折常导致严重的创伤和并发症。本研究旨在评估联合内侧和外侧微创入路与传统 Judet 入路的疗效。

材料与方法

回顾性分析 2016 年 5 月至 2022 年 5 月期间收治的 36 例移位肩胛体和颈部骨折患者(22 例男性,14 例女性;平均年龄 45.6 岁)。19 例患者采用微创入路,17 例患者采用传统 Judet 入路。主要结局指标包括手术切口长度、术中失血量、并发症发生率、术后疼痛缓解时间(VAS 评分≤3)和 12 个月时的 Constant-Murley 肩关节评分。采用 t 检验和卡方检验进行统计学分析。

结果

微创组切口长度更短(平均差异:10.0cm;95%CI:8.1-11.9;P<0.001),失血量更少(平均差异:129.4mL;95%CI:119.0-139.8;P<0.001)。他们还能更快地缓解疼痛(平均差异:3.0 天;95%CI:2.5-3.5;P<0.001),Constant-Murley 评分更高(平均差异:7.4 分;95%CI:4.9-9.9;P<0.001)。手术时间和骨折愈合时间无显著差异。

结论

联合内侧和外侧微创入路可减少切口长度、失血量、并发症和疼痛,改善肩部功能,是传统 Judet 入路的安全有效替代方法。

相似文献

1
Minimally Invasive Combined Medial and Lateral Approach for Treating Displaced Scapular Body and Neck Fractures.微创联合内侧和外侧入路治疗移位肩胛体颈骨折。
Med Sci Monit. 2024 Oct 12;30:e945535. doi: 10.12659/MSM.945535.
2
[POSTERIOR MINIMALLY INVASIVE APPROACH FOR RECONSTRUCTION OF SCAPULA OF FRACTURES].[肩胛骨骨折重建的后入路微创方法]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2014 Jul;28(7):793-7.
3
[Internal fixation of lateral and medial borders for displaced scapular body fractures via minimally invasive approach:results of 23 cases].[经微创入路行肩胛体移位骨折内外侧缘内固定术:23例报告]
Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2019 Dec 25;48(6):651-656. doi: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-9292.2019.12.10.
4
[Judet posterior approach to the scapula].[肩胛骨的Judet后侧入路]
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2008 Dec;75(6):429-35.
5
Modified Judet approach and minifragment fixation of scapular body and glenoid neck fractures.改良Judet入路及肩胛骨体部和肩胛盂颈部骨折的微型接骨板固定
J Orthop Trauma. 2009 Sep;23(8):558-64. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181a18216.
6
Posterior Approach for Open Reduction and Internal Fixation for Scapular Fractures.肩胛骨骨折切开复位内固定的后路手术入路
JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2023 Jul 21;13(3). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.22.00035. eCollection 2023 Jul-Sep.
7
Superior approach to the glenoid for treating acromion fractures combined with ideberg type III scapular glenoid fractures: a technical note.经肩峰入路治疗肩峰骨折合并 Ideberg Ⅲ型肩胛盂骨折:技术要点。
Int Orthop. 2024 Oct;48(10):2749-2754. doi: 10.1007/s00264-024-06273-7. Epub 2024 Aug 28.
8
Surgical technique: a minimally invasive approach to scapula neck and body fractures.手术技术:微创治疗肩胛骨颈和体部骨折。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Dec;469(12):3390-9. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-1970-3.
9
Ring versus non-ring plate for the treatment of displaced scapular body fractures: a retrospective study with a mean follow-up of 5 years.环形钢板与非环形钢板治疗肩胛体移位骨折:一项平均随访5年的回顾性研究
J Int Med Res. 2018 Jul;46(7):2731-2742. doi: 10.1177/0300060518770568. Epub 2018 May 29.
10
Finite element analysis of the treatment of a minimally invasive approach combined with a novel anatomical locking plate for scapular body fractures.微创入路联合新型解剖锁定钢板治疗肩胛体骨折的有限元分析
J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Jul 17;19(1):410. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-04905-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing Single and Dual Plating in Displaced Scapular Body Fractures: A Retrospective Study of Clinical and Functional Outcomes.移位肩胛体骨折单钢板与双钢板固定的比较:临床及功能预后的回顾性研究
J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 4;14(13):4740. doi: 10.3390/jcm14134740.

本文引用的文献

1
Epidemiology, treatment, and mortality of 3973 scapula fractures from the Swedish fracture register.来自瑞典骨折登记处的3973例肩胛骨骨折的流行病学、治疗及死亡率
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2025 Jan;34(1):e47-e56. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.03.024. Epub 2024 Apr 28.
2
Three-Dimensional Mapping of Scapular Body, Neck, and Glenoid Fractures.肩胛骨体、颈和肩胛盂骨折的三维定位
J Orthop Trauma. 2024 Feb 1;38(2):e48-e54. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000002734.
3
Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) for scapular fractures.微创钢板接骨术(MIPO)治疗肩胛骨骨折。
Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2023 Dec;35(6):390-396. doi: 10.1007/s00064-023-00819-5. Epub 2023 Aug 18.
4
Novel Claw-shaped Bone Plate in Complex Unstable Scapular Neck and Body Fractures: Comparison with Reconstruction Locking Plate.新型爪形骨板治疗复杂不稳定肩胛颈和体部骨折:与重建锁定钢板的比较。
Orthop Surg. 2023 Aug;15(8):2124-2131. doi: 10.1111/os.13766. Epub 2023 May 24.
5
Operative treatment of complex intra-articular scapular fractures: long-term functional outcomes in a single-center study.手术治疗复杂关节内肩胛骨折:单中心研究的长期功能结果。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023 Jul;33(5):1621-1627. doi: 10.1007/s00590-022-03323-x. Epub 2022 Jul 4.
6
Augmented reality and three-dimensional plate library-assisted posterior minimally invasive surgery for scapula fracture.增强现实与三维钢板库辅助下的肩胛骨骨折后路微创手术
Int Orthop. 2022 Apr;46(4):875-882. doi: 10.1007/s00264-022-05303-6. Epub 2022 Jan 21.
7
Osteosynthesis of scapular fractures: a retrospective cohort study.肩胛骨折的内固定治疗:一项回顾性队列研究。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022 Dec;142(12):3845-3852. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-04283-3. Epub 2022 Jan 7.
8
Homemade 3D mirror imaging models utility for surgical treatment of complex fractures of scapula.自制 3D 镜像成像模型在肩胛骨复杂骨折手术治疗中的应用。
Injury. 2021 Jul;52 Suppl 4:S109-S116. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2021.04.061. Epub 2021 May 1.
9
Current challenges and controversies in the management of scapular fractures: a review.肩胛骨骨折治疗中的当前挑战与争议:综述
Patient Saf Surg. 2021 Jan 6;15(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s13037-020-00281-3.
10
Can displaced extra-articular fractures of the scapula be stabilized through a direct lateral-column approach.肩胛骨移位的关节外骨折能否通过直接外侧柱入路实现稳定固定?
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2020 Jul;11(Suppl 4):S626-S630. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2020.05.017. Epub 2020 May 18.