Department of Orthopedics, Suzhou Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Department of Orthopedics, Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Med Sci Monit. 2024 Oct 12;30:e945535. doi: 10.12659/MSM.945535.
BACKGROUND Traditional open surgery for displaced scapular body and neck fractures often results in significant trauma and complications. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of a combined medial and lateral minimally invasive approach compared with the traditional Judet approach. MATERIAL AND METHODS A retrospective analysis was conducted on 36 patients (22 men, 14 women; mean age 45.6 years) with displaced scapular body and neck fractures treated between May 2016 and May 2022. Nineteen patients underwent the minimally invasive approach, while 17 received the traditional Judet approach. Primary outcomes included surgical incision length, intraoperative blood loss, complication rate, time to postoperative pain relief (VAS score ≤3), and Constant-Murley shoulder score at 12 months. Statistical analysis was done using the t test and chi-square test. RESULTS The minimally invasive group had shorter incision lengths (mean difference: 10.0 cm; 95% CI: 8.1-11.9; P<0.001) and lower blood loss (mean difference: 129.4 mL; 95% CI: 119.0-139.8; P<0.001). They also experienced faster pain relief (mean difference: 3.0 days; 95% CI: 2.5-3.5; P<0.001) and higher Constant-Murley scores (mean difference: 7.4 points; 95% CI: 4.9-9.9; P<0.001). There were no significant differences in operative duration or fracture healing time. CONCLUSIONS The combined medial and lateral minimally invasive approach offers superior outcomes in reducing incision length, blood loss, complications, and pain, with enhanced shoulder function, making it a safe and effective alternative to the traditional Judet approach.
传统的开放式手术治疗移位肩胛体和颈部骨折常导致严重的创伤和并发症。本研究旨在评估联合内侧和外侧微创入路与传统 Judet 入路的疗效。
回顾性分析 2016 年 5 月至 2022 年 5 月期间收治的 36 例移位肩胛体和颈部骨折患者(22 例男性,14 例女性;平均年龄 45.6 岁)。19 例患者采用微创入路,17 例患者采用传统 Judet 入路。主要结局指标包括手术切口长度、术中失血量、并发症发生率、术后疼痛缓解时间(VAS 评分≤3)和 12 个月时的 Constant-Murley 肩关节评分。采用 t 检验和卡方检验进行统计学分析。
微创组切口长度更短(平均差异:10.0cm;95%CI:8.1-11.9;P<0.001),失血量更少(平均差异:129.4mL;95%CI:119.0-139.8;P<0.001)。他们还能更快地缓解疼痛(平均差异:3.0 天;95%CI:2.5-3.5;P<0.001),Constant-Murley 评分更高(平均差异:7.4 分;95%CI:4.9-9.9;P<0.001)。手术时间和骨折愈合时间无显著差异。
联合内侧和外侧微创入路可减少切口长度、失血量、并发症和疼痛,改善肩部功能,是传统 Judet 入路的安全有效替代方法。