Stress Distribution Patterns of the Femorotibial Joint After Medial Closing-Wedge Distal Femoral Varus Osteotomy: An Evaluation Using Computed Tomography Osteoabsorptiometry.

BACKGROUND

Distal femoral varus osteotomy (DFVO) is an established surgical procedure for addressing valgus malalignment across various knee conditions. However, the effect of DFVO on stress distribution within the femorotibial joint has not been explored through in vivo studies.

PURPOSE

To (1) explore the distribution pattern of subchondral bone density across the proximal tibia in nonarthritic knees without arthritis and in those of patients with valgus knees, (2) assess changes in the pattern of bone density distribution in patients with valgus knees before and after medial closing-wedge (MCW) DFVO, and (3) determine the correlation between leg alignment and changes in bone density distribution.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively analyzed clinical and radiographic data from 14 patients (14 knees; mean age, 44 years; 3 men, 11 women) treated with MCW-DFVO for lateral compartment osteoarthritis (OA) due to valgus malalignment, alongside a control group of 18 patients (18 knees; mean age, 21 years; 4 men, 14 women) without OA. The distribution patterns of subchondral bone density distribution on the femorotibial articular surface of the tibia were examined both preoperatively and >1 year postoperatively using computed tomography osteoabsorptiometry. Quantitative analyses were conducted on the locations and percentages of the high-density areas (HDAs) on the articular surface. The mean time between surgery and the postoperative radiograph and computed tomography absorptiometry imaging was 13.6 months (range, 11-19 months). The mean length of clinical follow-up was 28.7 months (range, 14-62 months) after surgery.

RESULTS

The mean proportion of HDA in the lateral compartment relative to the total HDA (lateral ratio) was significantly greater in the preoperative OA group (58.8%) compared with the control group (41.1%) ( < .001). After MCW-DFVO, the mean lateral ratio in the OA group notably declined to 45.3% ( < .001). The lateral ratio exhibited a significant correlation with the hip-knee-ankle angle in both the control ( = 0.630; = .011) and OA ( = 0.537; = .047) groups. Moreover, the alteration in the lateral ratio after MCW-DFVO showed a significant relationship with changes in the hip-knee-ankle angle ( = 0.742; = .002) and the mechanical lateral distal femoral angle ( = -0.752; = .002). Within the lateral compartment, HDAs in the 3 lateral regions of the 4 lateral subregions diminished after MCW-DFVO, whereas in the medial compartment, HDAs in the 3 lateral subregions saw an increase.

CONCLUSION

The mean lateral ratio was significantly greater in the preoperative OA group compared with the control group. MCW-DFVO resulted in a redistribution of HDA from the lateral to the medial compartment of the proximal tibial articular surface. The extent of alignment correction after MCW-DFVO was closely linked to the shifts in HDA distribution, reflecting changes in stress distribution.