Department of Anesthesiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA.
Department of Anesthesiology, Zablocki Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Milwaukee, WI 53295, USA.
Anaesth Intensive Care. 2024 Nov;52(6):386-396. doi: 10.1177/0310057X241264575. Epub 2024 Oct 12.
Skin injuries are a major healthcare problem that are not well understood or prevented in the critically ill, suggesting that underappreciated variables are contributing. This pilot study tested the hypothesis that perfusion-related factors contribute to skin injuries diagnosed as hospital-acquired pressure injuries (HAPIs). A total of 533 adult patients were followed over 2574 critical care days (mean age 62.4, standard deviation (SD) 14.3 years, mean body mass index 30.4 (SD 7.4) kg/m, 36.4% female). This was a secondary analysis of prospective, non-randomised clinical data from an intensive care unit at a large urban teaching hospital. Factors related to perfusion, specifically two or more infusions of vasopressors/inotropes, temporary mechanical circulatory support (MCS), extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and durable MCS, were analysed to determine whether they were more strongly associated with HAPIs than immobility due to prolonged mechanical ventilation (>72 h) or operating room time (>6 h). Patients diagnosed with a HAPI had a statistically significant higher risk of being exposed to variables related to perfusion and immobility ( < 0.05 for each variable). Perfusion-related variables, except durable MCS, had a larger effect on skin breakdown (number needed to harm (NNH) 4-10) than immobility-associated variables (NNH 12-17). The finding that perfusion-related variables predicted HAPIs may warrant consideration of alternative diagnoses, such as skin failure due to impaired perfusion as a pathophysiological process that occurs concurrently with multisystem organ failure. Differentiation of skin injuries primarily from circulatory malfunction, rather than external pressure, may guide the development of more effective treatment and prevention protocols. This pilot study suggests that the contribution of perfusion to skin injuries should be explored further.
皮肤损伤是一个严重的医疗保健问题,在危重病患者中尚未得到很好的理解或预防,这表明一些被低估的变量在起作用。这项初步研究检验了一个假设,即与灌注相关的因素导致了被诊断为医院获得性压力性损伤(HAPI)的皮肤损伤。共有 533 名成年患者在 2574 个重症监护日(平均年龄 62.4 岁,标准差 14.3 岁,平均体重指数 30.4(标准差 7.4)kg/m,女性占 36.4%)中接受了随访。这是对一家大型城市教学医院重症监护病房的前瞻性、非随机临床数据的二次分析。与灌注相关的因素,特别是两种或更多种血管加压素/正性肌力药输注、临时机械循环支持(MCS)、体外膜肺氧合和持久 MCS,被分析以确定它们与由于长时间机械通气(>72 小时)或手术室时间(>6 小时)导致的无法活动相比,是否与 HAPI 更密切相关。与 HAPI 相关的患者暴露于与灌注和无法活动相关的变量的风险显著更高(每个变量的差异均为 <0.05)。与灌注相关的变量(除了持久 MCS 外)对皮肤破裂的影响比与无法活动相关的变量(NNH 12-17)更大(NNH 4-10)。灌注相关变量预测 HAPI 的发现可能需要考虑替代诊断,例如由于灌注受损导致的皮肤衰竭,这是一种与多器官系统衰竭同时发生的病理生理过程。将皮肤损伤主要归因于循环功能障碍,而不是外部压力,可能有助于制定更有效的治疗和预防方案。这项初步研究表明,应进一步探讨灌注对皮肤损伤的贡献。