Comparison of the Effects of Inappropriate Meal Timing-Induced and Genetic Models of Circadian Clock Disruption on Uterine mRNA Expression Profiles.

BACKGROUND

Accumulating evidence reveals that inappropriate meal timing contributes to the development of lifestyle-related diseases. An underlying mechanism is thought to be the disruption of the intracellular circadian clock in various tissues based on observations in both systemic and tissue-specific clock gene-deficient mice. However, whether the effects of conditional clock gene knockout are comparable to those of inappropriate meal timing remains unclear.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to compare the effects of a recently developed 28-h feeding cycle model with those of a core clock gene Bmal1 uterine conditional knockout (Bmal1 cKO) model on uterine mRNA expression profiles.

METHODS

The models were generated by subjecting C57BL/6J mice to an 8-h/20-h feeding/fasting cycle for 2 wk and crossing Bmal1-floxed mice with PR-Cre mice. Microarray analyses were conducted using uterine samples obtained at the beginning of the dark and light periods.

RESULTS

The analyses identified 516 and 346, significantly 4-fold and 2-fold, up- or downregulated genes in the 28-h feeding cycle and Bmal1 cKO groups, respectively, compared with each control group. Among these genes, only 7 (1.4%) and 63 (18.2%) were significantly up- or downregulated in the other model. Moreover, most (n = 44, 62.9%) of these genes were oppositely regulated. These findings were confirmed by gene set enrichment analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

This study reveals that a 28-h feeding cycle and Bmal1 cKO differently affect gene expression profiles and highlights the need for considering this difference to assess the pathophysiology of diseases associated with inappropriate meal timing.