• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为什么在 COVID-19 大流行期间进行的公共卫生和社会措施的随机试验如此之少?挪威的经验。

Why were so few randomized trials of public health and social measures conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic? The Norwegian experience.

机构信息

Centre for Epidemic Interventions Research, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.

Centre for Evaluation of Public Health Measures, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Trials. 2024 Oct 12;25(1):673. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08547-2.

DOI:10.1186/s13063-024-08547-2
PMID:39396052
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11470701/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Few randomized trials of public health and social measures were carried out during the COVID-19 pandemic. We report on the major barriers we faced when we tried to run such trials.

METHODS

We reviewed all randomized trials proposed and initiated by the Centre for Epidemic Interventions Research in Norway during the COVID-19 pandemic.

RESULTS

Of the 18 proposed trials, 11 trials were not implemented. One of the key legal and ethical barriers to conducting the trials was the Norwegian Health Research Act, which demands informed consent from all participants who are exposed to an intervention. A lack of sufficient political support was also a challenge, as was unpredictability, due to shifting disease incidence and changing recommendations from the authorities.

CONCLUSION

Strengthening the evidence base for public health and social measures in pandemics will require political and public understanding and support and a legal framework that allows for the conduct of such trials.

摘要

背景

在 COVID-19 大流行期间,很少有针对公共卫生和社会措施的随机试验。我们报告了在尝试进行此类试验时所面临的主要障碍。

方法

我们审查了挪威传染病干预研究中心在 COVID-19 大流行期间提出和启动的所有随机试验。

结果

在提出的 18 项试验中,有 11 项未实施。开展这些试验的一个主要法律和伦理障碍是挪威《健康研究法》,该法要求所有接触干预措施的参与者都要获得知情同意。缺乏足够的政治支持也是一个挑战,因为疾病发病率的不可预测性以及当局建议的不断变化也是一个挑战。

结论

加强大流行期间公共卫生和社会措施的证据基础需要得到政治和公众的理解和支持,以及一个允许进行此类试验的法律框架。

相似文献

1
Why were so few randomized trials of public health and social measures conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic? The Norwegian experience.为什么在 COVID-19 大流行期间进行的公共卫生和社会措施的随机试验如此之少?挪威的经验。
Trials. 2024 Oct 12;25(1):673. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08547-2.
2
Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses.物理干预措施以阻断或减少呼吸道病毒的传播。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jan 30;1(1):CD006207. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006207.pub6.
3
Measures implemented in the school setting to contain the COVID-19 pandemic.学校为控制 COVID-19 疫情而采取的措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jan 17;1(1):CD015029. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015029.
4
Technology-enabled CONTACT tracing in care homes in the COVID-19 pandemic: the CONTACT non-randomised mixed-methods feasibility study.新冠疫情期间养老院中基于技术的接触者追踪:CONTACT非随机混合方法可行性研究
Health Technol Assess. 2025 May;29(24):1-24. doi: 10.3310/UHDN6497.
5
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
6
Antibody tests for identification of current and past infection with SARS-CoV-2.抗体检测用于鉴定 SARS-CoV-2 的现症感染和既往感染。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 17;11(11):CD013652. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013652.pub2.
7
Rapid, point-of-care antigen tests for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.用于 SARS-CoV-2 感染诊断的快速、即时抗原检测。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 22;7(7):CD013705. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013705.pub3.
8
Unintended consequences of measures implemented in the school setting to contain the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review.学校为遏制新冠疫情而采取的措施所产生的意外后果:一项范围综述。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 12;12(12):CD015397. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015397.pub2.
9
Interventions to prevent misconduct and promote integrity in research and publication.预防科研与出版领域不当行为并促进诚信的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 4;4(4):MR000038. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000038.pub2.
10
Conceptual framework and systematic review of the effects of participants' and professionals' preferences in randomised controlled trials.随机对照试验中参与者和专业人员偏好影响的概念框架与系统评价
Health Technol Assess. 2005 Sep;9(35):1-186, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta9350.

引用本文的文献

1
Strengthening research preparedness for crises: lessons from Norwegian government agencies in using randomized trials and quasi-experimental methods to evaluate public policy interventions.加强应对危机的研究准备:挪威政府机构运用随机试验和准实验方法评估公共政策干预措施的经验教训。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2025 Jan 13;23(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01271-y.

本文引用的文献

1
Ethical Challenges Associated with Pragmatic and Cluster RCTs.与实用和整群随机对照试验相关的伦理挑战。
N Engl J Med. 2024 Sep 19;391(11):969-971. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2403550. Epub 2024 Sep 14.
2
Personal protective effect of wearing surgical face masks in public spaces on self-reported respiratory symptoms in adults: pragmatic randomised superiority trial.佩戴医用口罩对成年人在公共场所自述呼吸道症状的个人防护效果:实用随机优势试验。
BMJ. 2024 Jul 24;386:e078918. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2023-078918.
3
Clinical trials and their impact on policy during COVID-19: a review.COVID-19期间的临床试验及其对政策的影响:综述
Wellcome Open Res. 2024 Jan 30;9:20. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.19305.1. eCollection 2024.
4
Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses.物理干预措施以阻断或减少呼吸道病毒的传播。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jan 30;1(1):CD006207. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006207.pub6.
5
Effect of Wearing Glasses on Risk of Infection With SARS-CoV-2 in the Community: A Randomized Clinical Trial.戴眼镜对社区人群感染 SARS-CoV-2 风险的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Dec 1;5(12):e2244495. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.44495.
6
The Evaluation of a Social Media Campaign to Increase COVID-19 Testing in Migrant Groups: Cluster Randomized Trial.社交媒体活动评估以增加移民群体的 COVID-19 检测:集群随机试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Mar 24;24(3):e34544. doi: 10.2196/34544.
7
Impact of community masking on COVID-19: A cluster-randomized trial in Bangladesh.社区戴口罩对 COVID-19 的影响:孟加拉国的一项集群随机试验。
Science. 2022 Jan 14;375(6577):eabi9069. doi: 10.1126/science.abi9069.
8
Public health measures for covid-19.针对新冠疫情的公共卫生措施。
BMJ. 2021 Nov 17;375:n2729. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n2729.
9
Covid-19 transmission in fitness centers in Norway - a randomized trial.挪威健身中心的新冠病毒传播 - 一项随机试验。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Nov 16;21(1):2103. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-12073-0.
10
The Effectiveness of Free Face Mask Distribution on Use of Face Masks. A Cluster Randomised Trial in Stovner District of Oslo, Norway.免费发放口罩对口罩使用效果的影响。挪威奥斯陆斯托弗内区的一项集群随机试验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 26;18(17):8971. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18178971.