Cancer Diagnostics Research Division, Shizuoka Cancer Center Research Institute, Shizuoka, Japan.
SRL Inc., Tokyo, Japan.
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 12;14(1):23898. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-74272-0.
In cancer genome analysis, identifying pathogenic alterations and assessing their effects on oncogenic processes is important. Although whole exome sequencing (WES) can effectively detect such changes, driver alterations could not be identified in 27.8% of the cases, according to a previous study. The objectives of the present study were to evaluate the utility of whole genome sequencing (WGS) and clarify its differences with WES in terms of driver alteration detection. For this purpose, WGS analysis was conducted on 177 driverless WES samples, selected from 5,480 fresh frozen samples derived from 5,140 Japanese patients with cancer. These samples were selected as primary tumor, both WES and transcriptome profiling were performed, estimated tumor content of ≥ 30%, and no driver alterations were identified by WES. WGS identified driver and likely driver alterations in 68.4 and 22.6% of the samples, respectively. The most frequent alteration type was oncogene amplification, followed by tumor suppressor gene deletion and small variants located outside the coding region. In the remaining 9.0% of samples, no such signals were identified; therefore, further investigations are required. The current study clearly demonstrated the role and utility of WGS in identifying genomic alterations that contribute to tumorigenesis.
在癌症基因组分析中,鉴定致病性改变并评估其对致癌过程的影响很重要。尽管全外显子组测序(WES)可以有效地检测到这些变化,但根据之前的一项研究,仍有 27.8%的病例无法确定驱动性改变。本研究的目的是评估全基因组测序(WGS)的实用性,并阐明其在检测驱动性改变方面与 WES 的差异。为此,对 177 个无驱动 WES 样本进行了 WGS 分析,这些样本选自 5140 名日本癌症患者的 5480 个新鲜冷冻样本,这些样本是原发性肿瘤,WES 和转录组分析都进行了,估计肿瘤含量≥30%,并且 WES 未发现驱动改变。WGS 分别在 68.4%和 22.6%的样本中鉴定出驱动和可能的驱动改变。最常见的改变类型是癌基因扩增,其次是肿瘤抑制基因缺失和位于编码区之外的小变异。在其余 9.0%的样本中,没有发现这些信号,因此需要进一步的研究。本研究清楚地表明了 WGS 在识别导致肿瘤发生的基因组改变方面的作用和实用性。