Suppr超能文献

耳鸣患者听觉皮层局灶性经颅直流电刺激的感知和认知效应

Perceptual and Cognitive Effects of Focal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of Auditory Cortex in Tinnitus.

作者信息

Leaver Amber M

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

Neuromodulation. 2025 Jan;28(1):136-145. doi: 10.1016/j.neurom.2024.06.001. Epub 2024 Oct 11.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been studied as a potential treatment for many brain conditions. Although tDCS is well tolerated, continued study of perceptual and cognitive side effects is warranted, given the complexity of functional brain organization. This study tests the feasibility of brief tablet-based tasks to assess auditory and cognitive side effects in a recently reported pilot study of auditory-cortex tDCS in chronic tinnitus and attempts to confirm that this untested multisession tDCS protocol does not worsen hearing.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Participants with chronic tinnitus completed two hearing tasks (pure-tone thresholds, Words In Noise [WIN]) and two cognitive tasks (Flanker, Dimension Change Card Sort) from the NIH Toolbox (2024 Toolbox Assessments, Inc, Lincolnwood, IL). Participants were randomized to active or sham 4×1 silver/silver-chloride tDCS of left auditory cortex (n = 10/group). Tasks were completed immediately before and after the first tDCS session, and after the fifth/final tDCS session. Statistics included linear mixed-effects models for change in task performance over time.

RESULTS

Before tDCS, performance on both auditory tasks was highly correlated with clinical audiometry, supporting the external validity of these measures (r > 0.89 for all). Although overall auditory task performance did not change after active or sham tDCS, detection of right-ear WIN stimuli modestly improved after five active tDCS sessions (t = -2.07, p = 0.05). On cognitive tasks, reaction times (RTs) were quicker after sham tDCS, reflecting expected practice effects (eg, t = 3.22, p = 0.002 after five sessions on the Flanker task). However, RTs did not improve over repeated sessions in the active group, suggesting that tDCS interfered with learning these practice effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Repeated sessions of auditory-cortex tDCS do not seem to adversely affect hearing or cognition but may modestly improve hearing in noise and interfere with some types of motor learning. Low-burden cognitive/perceptual test batteries could be a powerful way to identify adverse effects and new treatment targets in brain stimulation research.

摘要

目的

经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)已被作为多种脑部疾病的潜在治疗方法进行研究。尽管tDCS耐受性良好,但鉴于大脑功能组织的复杂性,仍有必要继续研究其感知和认知方面的副作用。本研究在一项最近报道的关于慢性耳鸣患者听觉皮层tDCS的初步研究中,测试基于平板电脑的简短任务评估听觉和认知副作用的可行性,并试图确认这种未经测试的多疗程tDCS方案不会使听力恶化。

材料与方法

慢性耳鸣患者完成了两项听力任务(纯音阈值、噪声中的言语[WIN])和两项来自美国国立卫生研究院工具箱(2024 Toolbox Assessments, Inc, Lincolnwood, IL)的认知任务(侧翼任务、维度变化卡片分类)。参与者被随机分为接受左侧听觉皮层4×1银/氯化银tDCS的活性组或假刺激组(每组n = 10)。任务在第一次tDCS疗程之前和之后,以及第五次/最后一次tDCS疗程之后立即完成。统计分析包括用于任务表现随时间变化的线性混合效应模型。

结果

在tDCS之前,两项听觉任务的表现与临床听力测定高度相关,支持了这些测量方法的外部效度(所有相关系数r > 0.89)。尽管活性或假刺激tDCS后总体听觉任务表现没有变化,但在五次活性tDCS疗程后,右耳WIN刺激的检测略有改善(t = -2.07,p = 0.05)。在认知任务方面,假刺激tDCS后反应时间(RTs)更快,反映了预期的练习效应(例如,在侧翼任务中进行五次疗程后,t = 3.22,p = 0.002)。然而,活性组在重复疗程中RTs并未改善,这表明tDCS干扰了这些练习效应的学习。

结论

重复进行听觉皮层tDCS疗程似乎不会对听力或认知产生不利影响,但可能会在一定程度上改善噪声环境下的听力,并干扰某些类型的运动学习。低负担的认知/感知测试组合可能是在脑刺激研究中识别不良反应和新治疗靶点的有力方法。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

4
Validation of a tablet-based assessment of auditory sensitivity for researchers.为研究人员验证基于片剂的听觉敏感性评估。
Behav Res Methods. 2023 Sep;55(6):2838-2852. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-01933-1. Epub 2022 Aug 12.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验