• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不转为开放手术的内镜下腕管松解术的手术技术及转为开放手术的原因分析

Surgical Technique for Performing Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release without Converting to an Open Technique, and Analysis of the Reasons for Conversion.

作者信息

Chung Dong-Bin, Jeon Hong Jun, Lee Jong Young, Park Se-Hyuck

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.

Department of Neurosurgery, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.

出版信息

World Neurosurg. 2025 Jan;193:1022-1027. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.10.020. Epub 2024 Nov 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.wneu.2024.10.020
PMID:39396636
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Endoscopic carpal tunnel release (ECTR) has advantages over open carpal tunnel release (OCTR); however, complications with ECTR are more likely to occur if the surgeon continues the procedure despite encountering difficulties. Techniques to minimize the need for conversion to OCTR have been infrequently discussed in the literature. This study aims to present a technique for performing ECTR without conversion to the open approach and to analyze the reasons for such conversions.

METHODS

A total of 1160 hands in 771 patients who underwent single-portal ECTR between January 2001 and December 2020 were analyzed. We evaluated the rate and reasons for conversion and compared clinical severity and electrodiagnostic grades between the ECTR and OCTR conversion groups to identify patient characteristics associated with conversion.

RESULTS

A total of 18 hands in 17 patients required conversion to OCTR (1.56%). In the first 5 years, 9 out of 251 ECTRs (3.59%) were converted, but since then, the conversion rate significantly decreased with increasing surgical experience. The most common reasons for conversion were poor visualization of the transverse carpal ligament due to the transbursal approach with a hypertrophic synovial membrane. As the preoperative clinical grade worsened, the conversion rate significantly increased. The OCTR conversion rate also tended to rise with more severe electrodiagnostic grades. Outcomes for all 18 wrists were successful at the 6-month follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

A thorough subligamentous extrabursal approach is essential for achieving a clear endoscopic view of the transverse carpal ligament and performing ECTR without the need for conversion to open surgery.

摘要

目的

内镜下腕管松解术(ECTR)相较于开放性腕管松解术(OCTR)具有优势;然而,如果外科医生在遇到困难时仍继续手术,ECTR的并发症更有可能发生。关于将转为OCTR的需求降至最低的技术,在文献中很少被讨论。本研究旨在介绍一种无需转为开放手术方式即可进行ECTR的技术,并分析此类转为开放手术的原因。

方法

对2001年1月至2020年12月期间接受单通道ECTR的771例患者的1160只手进行了分析。我们评估了转为开放手术的发生率及原因,并比较了ECTR组和转为OCTR组之间的临床严重程度和电诊断分级,以确定与转为开放手术相关的患者特征。

结果

17例患者中的18只手需要转为OCTR(1.56%)。在最初的5年中,251例ECTR中有9例(3.59%)转为开放手术,但从那时起,随着手术经验的增加,转为开放手术的发生率显著降低。转为开放手术最常见的原因是经滑膜的入路导致腕横韧带可视化不佳以及滑膜肥厚。随着术前临床分级的恶化,转为开放手术的发生率显著增加。电诊断分级越严重,转为OCTR的发生率也往往越高。所有18例腕部在6个月随访时结果均成功。

结论

彻底的韧带下非滑膜入路对于获得腕横韧带清晰的内镜视野以及无需转为开放手术即可进行ECTR至关重要。

相似文献

1
Surgical Technique for Performing Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release without Converting to an Open Technique, and Analysis of the Reasons for Conversion.不转为开放手术的内镜下腕管松解术的手术技术及转为开放手术的原因分析
World Neurosurg. 2025 Jan;193:1022-1027. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.10.020. Epub 2024 Nov 2.
2
A Comparison of Amyloid Deposition in Endoscopic and Open Carpal Tunnel Release.内镜与开放腕管松解术中淀粉样沉积的比较。
J Hand Surg Am. 2024 Apr;49(4):301-309. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2024.01.002. Epub 2024 Feb 15.
3
A Comparison of Early Complication Rates of Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release With and Without Resident Involvement.内镜下腕管松解术有无住院医师参与的早期并发症发生率比较。
J Hand Surg Am. 2024 Mar;49(3):222-229. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2023.11.019. Epub 2023 Dec 28.
4
Long-term Trends in Open vs Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release Among the Medicare Population in the United States.美国 Medicare 人群中开放式与内窥镜下腕管松解术的长期趋势。
Hand (N Y). 2024 Oct;19(7):1069-1074. doi: 10.1177/15589447231168977. Epub 2023 May 6.
5
Endoscopic and Open Release Similarly Safe for the Treatment of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.内镜下和开放性松解术治疗腕管综合征同样安全。一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 16;10(12):e0143683. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143683. eCollection 2015.
6
A Small Number of Surgeons Perform the Large Majority of Uncommon Nerve Decompression Procedures.少数外科医生完成了绝大多数不常见的神经减压手术。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2182-2190. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003162. Epub 2024 Jun 21.
7
Absorbable versus non-absorbable sutures for skin closure after carpal tunnel decompression surgery.腕管减压术后皮肤缝合用可吸收缝线与不可吸收缝线的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 1;2(2):CD011757. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011757.pub2.
8
Open Versus Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release: A Comparison of Opioid Prescription Patterns and Occupational Therapy Referrals.开放式与内窥镜下腕管松解术:阿片类药物处方模式和职业治疗转介的比较。
Hand (N Y). 2024 Jul;19(5):776-782. doi: 10.1177/15589447221130092. Epub 2022 Nov 4.
9
A systematic review of reviews comparing the effectiveness of endoscopic and open carpal tunnel decompression.一项比较内镜下与开放性腕管减压术有效性的综述的系统评价。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004 Apr 1;113(4):1184-91. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000110202.08818.c1.
10
Carbon Footprint of Open Carpal Tunnel Release Surgery Performed in the Procedure Room Versus Operating Room Setting.在手术室内与手术室环境下进行开放式腕管松解术的碳足迹比较。
J Hand Surg Am. 2024 Jun;49(6):576-582. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2024.03.014. Epub 2024 May 6.

引用本文的文献

1
A Modified Surgical Technique for Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release.一种用于内镜下腕管松解术的改良手术技术。
Arthrosc Tech. 2025 May 9;14(7):103576. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2025.103576. eCollection 2025 Jul.