Department of Public Health, Zuckerberg College of Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Lowell, O'Leary Library 540-K 61 Wilder Street, Lowell, MA, 01854, USA.
Department of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Oct 13;24(1):1226. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11568-x.
Evidence-based and evidence-informed interventions designed to address gaps in the HIV care continuum have the potential to improve HIV care and treatment. However, inadequate organizational readiness can derail intervention uptake, prevent the integration of interventions, and contribute to suboptimal HIV treatment outcomes. This study sought to understand organizational readiness to implement bundled interventions for Black women with HIV and inform facilitators and barriers to implementation.
We conducted a mixed methods readiness assessment across 12 sites participating in the Black Women First (BWF) initiative to gauge preparedness to implement bundled interventions. Readiness was assessed using the organizational readiness for implementing change (ORIC) scale, and two open-ended questions examined facilitators and barriers. Associations between participant and organizational level factors were evaluated using linear models with clustering by site at baseline, 6- and 12-months. Pre-implementation interviews were conducted with staff virtually and transcripts were managed in NVivo. Directed content analysis was used to explore implementation barriers and facilitators.
Sites demonstrated high levels of organizational readiness at baseline; overall organizational readiness for implementing change (ORIC) (mean 56.4, median 59, interquartile range [IQR] 5) and subscales of the ORIC change efficacy (mean 32.4, median 35, IQR 4), change commitment (mean 24, median 25, IQR 1), which is consistent with willingness and capability to implement bundled interventions for Black women with HIV. Organizational readiness remained high at 6- and 12-month follow-up periods. Staff role was significantly associated with organizational readiness (p = 0.007), change efficacy (p = 0.006), and change commitment (p = 0.020) at 6 months. Qualitative analysis indicated strategic planning and assessment (e.g., team coordination and the development of workflows to support implementation); organizational change through network weaving across silos within the organization, and communications systems that engage external partners, as well as resources available for hiring and training, supported readiness. Collaborative leadership and organizational buy-in, staff motivation, and partnerships facilitated implementation processes.
Organizations in the BWF initiative have high levels of organizational readiness reflecting willingness and capability to implement bundled interventions for Black women with HIV. Future research should examine the relationship between readiness and clinical outcomes.
旨在解决 HIV 护理连续体中差距的循证和循证干预措施有可能改善 HIV 护理和治疗。然而,组织准备不足可能会破坏干预措施的采用,阻止干预措施的整合,并导致 HIV 治疗结果不理想。本研究旨在了解针对感染 HIV 的黑人女性实施综合干预措施的组织准备情况,并为实施提供便利和障碍。
我们对参与黑人女性第一(BWF)倡议的 12 个地点进行了混合方法准备情况评估,以衡量实施综合干预措施的准备情况。使用组织变革实施准备(ORIC)量表评估准备情况,两个开放式问题考察了实施的促进因素和障碍。使用线性模型评估参与者和组织层面因素之间的关联,并在基线、6 个月和 12 个月时按地点进行聚类。在实施前通过虚拟方式对员工进行了访谈,并在 NVivo 中管理转录本。采用定向内容分析方法探讨实施障碍和促进因素。
各地点在基线时表现出较高的组织准备水平;总体实施变革的组织准备(ORIC)(平均值 56.4,中位数 59,四分位距[IQR] 5)和 ORIC 变革效能(平均值 32.4,中位数 35,IQR 4)、变革承诺(平均值 24,中位数 25,IQR 1)的子量表,这与为感染 HIV 的黑人女性实施综合干预措施的意愿和能力相符。组织准备在 6 个月和 12 个月的随访期间仍保持较高水平。员工角色与组织准备情况(p=0.007)、变革效能(p=0.006)和变革承诺(p=0.020)显著相关。定性分析表明,战略规划和评估(例如,团队协调和开发支持实施的工作流程);通过在组织内各部门之间建立网络联系进行组织变革,以及建立沟通系统来吸引外部合作伙伴,以及为招聘和培训提供资源,这些都支持了准备情况。协作领导和组织认同、员工积极性和伙伴关系促进了实施过程。
BWF 倡议中的组织具有较高的组织准备水平,反映出为感染 HIV 的黑人女性实施综合干预措施的意愿和能力。未来的研究应研究准备情况与临床结果之间的关系。