• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

衡量南澳大利亚农村地区新的助产护理模式下组织实施变革的准备情况(ORIC)。

Measuring organizational readiness for implementing change (ORIC) in a new midwifery model of care in rural South Australia.

作者信息

Adelson Pamela, Yates Rachael, Fleet Julie-Anne, McKellar Lois

机构信息

Rosemary Bryant AO Research Centre, UniSA Clinical & Health Sciences, University of South Australia, City East Campus, Playford Building P4-27, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia.

Rural Support Service, South Australia Health, Government of South Australia, Mount Gambier Health Service, Mount Gambier, SA, 5290, Australia.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Apr 20;21(1):368. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06373-9.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-021-06373-9
PMID:33879145
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8056551/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The sustainability of Australian rural maternity services is under threat due to current workforce shortages. In July 2019, a new midwifery caseload model of care was implemented in rural South Australia to provide midwifery continuity of care and promote a sustainable workforce in the area. The model is unique as it brings together five birthing sites connecting midwives, doctors, nurses and community teams. A critical precursor to successful implementation requires those working in the model be ready to adopt to the change. We surveyed clinicians at the five sites transitioning to the new model of care in order to assess their organizational readiness to implement change.

METHODS

A descriptive study assessing readiness for change was measured using the Organizational Readiness for Implementing Change scale (ORIC). The 12 item Likert scale measures a participant's commitment to change and change efficacy. All clinicians working within the model of care (midwives, nurses and doctors) were invited to complete an e-survey.

RESULTS

Overall, 55% (56/102) of clinicians participating in the model responded. The mean ORIC score was 41.5 (range 12-60) suggesting collectively, midwives, nurses and doctors began the new model of care with a sense of readiness for change. Participants were most likely to agree on the change efficacy statements, "People who work here feel confident that the organization can get people invested in implementing this change and the change commitment statements "People who work here are determined to implement this change", "People who work here want to implement this change", and "People who work here are committed to implementing this change.

CONCLUSION

Results of the ORIC survey indicate that clinicians transitioning to the new model of care were willing to embrace change and commit to the new model. The process of organizational change in health care settings is challenging and a continuous process. If readiness for change is high, organizational members invest more in the change effort and exhibit greater persistence to overcome barriers and setbacks. This is the first reported use of the instrument amongst midwives and nurses in Australia and should be considered for use in other national and international clinical implementation studies.

摘要

背景

由于当前劳动力短缺,澳大利亚农村地区的孕产妇服务可持续性受到威胁。2019年7月,南澳大利亚农村地区实施了一种新的助产士个案管理护理模式,以提供助产士连续性护理,并促进该地区劳动力的可持续性。该模式独特之处在于它将五个分娩地点整合在一起,连接了助产士、医生、护士和社区团队。成功实施的一个关键前提是要求参与该模式的人员准备好接受变革。我们对五个地点转向新护理模式的临床医生进行了调查,以评估他们对实施变革的组织准备情况。

方法

一项评估变革准备情况的描述性研究使用了实施变革的组织准备量表(ORIC)进行测量。这个12项的李克特量表衡量参与者对变革的承诺和变革效能。所有在护理模式内工作的临床医生(助产士、护士和医生)都被邀请完成一项电子调查。

结果

总体而言,参与该模式的临床医生中有55%(56/102)做出了回应。ORIC平均得分是41.5(范围为12 - 60),这表明总体而言,助产士、护士和医生开始新护理模式时具有变革准备意识。参与者最有可能认同变革效能陈述,即“在这里工作的人相信组织能够让人们投入到实施这一变革中”,以及变革承诺陈述,即“在这里工作的人决心实施这一变革”、“在这里工作的人想要实施这一变革”和“在这里工作的人致力于实施这一变革”。

结论

ORIC调查结果表明,转向新护理模式的临床医生愿意接受变革并致力于新模式。医疗保健环境中的组织变革过程具有挑战性且是一个持续的过程。如果变革准备程度高,组织成员会在变革努力中投入更多,并表现出更大的毅力来克服障碍和挫折。这是该工具在澳大利亚助产士和护士中首次被报道使用,应考虑在其他国内和国际临床实施研究中使用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2c4c/8056551/623804f2aed3/12913_2021_6373_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2c4c/8056551/623804f2aed3/12913_2021_6373_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2c4c/8056551/623804f2aed3/12913_2021_6373_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Measuring organizational readiness for implementing change (ORIC) in a new midwifery model of care in rural South Australia.衡量南澳大利亚农村地区新的助产护理模式下组织实施变革的准备情况(ORIC)。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Apr 20;21(1):368. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06373-9.
2
'There is no other option': Exploring health care providers' experiences implementing regional multisite midwifery model of care in South Australia.“别无他选”:探索南澳大利亚医疗服务提供者实施区域性多地点助产护理模式的经验。
Aust J Rural Health. 2024 Feb;32(1):67-79. doi: 10.1111/ajr.13066. Epub 2023 Nov 20.
3
Implementing the organizational readiness for change survey during a novel midwifery preceptor program in Sierra Leone: stakeholder results.在塞拉利昂实施新型助产士导师计划期间进行组织变革准备情况调查:利益相关者的结果。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Aug 21;24(1):961. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11435-9.
4
Assessing the reliability and validity of the Danish version of Organizational Readiness for Implementing Change (ORIC).评估丹麦版组织变革实施准备度(ORIC)的可靠性和有效性。
Implement Sci. 2018 Jun 5;13(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0769-y.
5
Care delivery and compensation system changes: a case study of organizational readiness within a large dental care practice organization in the United States.医疗服务与薪酬体系变革:美国一家大型牙科护理机构组织准备情况的案例研究
BMC Oral Health. 2017 Dec 20;17(1):157. doi: 10.1186/s12903-017-0448-4.
6
Implementing caseload midwifery: Exploring the views of maternity managers in Australia - A national cross-sectional survey.实施个案量助产护理:探究澳大利亚产科管理人员的观点——一项全国性横断面调查。
Women Birth. 2016 Jun;29(3):214-22. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2015.10.010. Epub 2015 Nov 19.
7
Measuring Organizational Readiness for Implementing Change in Primary Care Facilities in Rural Bushbuckridge, South Africa.测量南非布须曼布什克鲁格农村初级保健设施实施变革的准备情况。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Jul 1;11(7):912-918. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2020.223. Epub 2020 Nov 23.
8
Psychometric properties of two implementation measures: Normalization MeAsure Development questionnaire (NoMAD) and organizational readiness for implementing change (ORIC).两种实施措施的心理测量特性:标准化测量发展问卷(NoMAD)和实施变革的组织准备情况(ORIC)。
Implement Res Pract. 2024 Apr 28;5:26334895241245448. doi: 10.1177/26334895241245448. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
9
Midwives' views of caseload midwifery - comparing the caseload and non-caseload midwives' opinions. A cross-sectional survey of Australian midwives.产婆对病例产程助产的看法-比较病例产程助产士和非病例产程助产士的意见。对澳大利亚产婆的横断面调查。
Women Birth. 2021 Feb;34(1):e47-e56. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2020.06.006. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
10
Primary Maternity Units in rural and remote Australia: Results of a national survey.澳大利亚农村和偏远地区的初级产科单位:一项全国性调查的结果。
Midwifery. 2016 Sep;40:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2016.05.004. Epub 2016 May 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding context: leveraging the pragmatic robust implementation sustainability model to inform the implementation of a community-based southeastern preconception counseling intervention to improve maternal health equity.理解背景:利用务实稳健实施可持续性模型为基于社区的东南部孕前咨询干预措施的实施提供信息,以改善孕产妇健康公平性。
Discov Health Syst. 2025;4(1):71. doi: 10.1007/s44250-025-00257-z. Epub 2025 Jun 13.
2
Organizational readiness for change: A systematic review of the healthcare literature.组织变革准备度:对医疗保健文献的系统评价
Implement Res Pract. 2025 May 15;6:26334895251334536. doi: 10.1177/26334895251334536. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Translation and psychometric evaluation of the German version of the Organisational Readiness for Implementing Change measure (ORIC): a cross-sectional study.组织变革实施准备度测量表(ORIC)德语版的翻译与心理计量学评估:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jun 7;10(6):e034380. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034380.
2
French cross-cultural adaptation of the Organizational Readiness for Implementing Change (ORIC).法国跨文化适应组织变革实施准备度(ORIC)。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jul 31;19(1):535. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4361-1.
3
Ready for the Triple Aim? Perspectives on organizational readiness for implementing change from a Danish obstetrics and gynecology department.
The system can change: a feasibility study of a doula-clinician collaborative at a large tertiary hospital in the United States.
该系统可以改变:美国一家大型三级医院中导乐与临床医生协作的可行性研究。
Implement Sci Commun. 2024 Dec 31;5(1):144. doi: 10.1186/s43058-024-00682-w.
4
Organizational readiness for change towards implementing a sepsis survivor hospital to home transition-in-care protocol.医疗机构为实施脓毒症幸存者从医院到家庭的过渡护理协议而进行变革的准备情况。
Front Health Serv. 2024 Sep 6;4:1436375. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2024.1436375. eCollection 2024.
5
Implementing the organizational readiness for change survey during a novel midwifery preceptor program in Sierra Leone: stakeholder results.在塞拉利昂实施新型助产士导师计划期间进行组织变革准备情况调查:利益相关者的结果。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Aug 21;24(1):961. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11435-9.
6
Ending the HIV Epidemic in Metropolitan Atlanta: a mixed-methods study to support the local HIV/AIDS response.终结亚特兰大都会区的艾滋病毒流行:支持当地艾滋病毒/艾滋病应对的混合方法研究。
J Int AIDS Soc. 2024 Jul;27(7):e26322. doi: 10.1002/jia2.26322.
7
Organizational readiness and implementation fidelity of an early childhood education and care-specific physical activity policy intervention: findings from the Play Active trial.幼儿教育和关怀特定体育活动政策干预的组织准备和实施一致性:来自“积极游戏”试验的结果。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2024 Feb 23;46(1):158-167. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdad221.
8
Organisational and individual readiness for change to respectful maternity care practice and associated factors in Ibadan, Nigeria: a cross-sectional survey.尼日利亚伊巴丹市尊重产妇护理实践变革的组织和个人准备情况及其相关因素:一项横断面调查。
BMJ Open. 2022 Nov 22;12(11):e065517. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065517.
是否已准备好实现三重目标?丹麦妇产科对实施变革的组织准备情况的看法。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jul 24;19(1):517. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4319-3.
4
Attitudes of Australian health professionals towards rapid genomic testing in neonatal and paediatric intensive care.澳大利亚卫生专业人员对新生儿和儿科重症监护中快速基因组检测的态度。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2019 Oct;27(10):1493-1501. doi: 10.1038/s41431-019-0429-y. Epub 2019 May 31.
5
Assessing the reliability and validity of the Danish version of Organizational Readiness for Implementing Change (ORIC).评估丹麦版组织变革实施准备度(ORIC)的可靠性和有效性。
Implement Sci. 2018 Jun 5;13(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0769-y.
6
Models of maternity care: evidence for midwifery continuity of care.产时保健模式:助产连续性照护的证据。
Med J Aust. 2016 Oct 17;205(8):370-374. doi: 10.5694/mja16.00844.
7
Primary Maternity Units in rural and remote Australia: Results of a national survey.澳大利亚农村和偏远地区的初级产科单位:一项全国性调查的结果。
Midwifery. 2016 Sep;40:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2016.05.004. Epub 2016 May 17.
8
Local birthing services for rural women: Adaptation of a rural New South Wales maternity service.为农村妇女提供的本地分娩服务:新南威尔士州农村地区产妇服务的调整
Aust J Rural Health. 2016 Dec;24(6):385-391. doi: 10.1111/ajr.12310. Epub 2016 Jul 6.
9
Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women.由助产士主导的连续性照护模式与针对育龄妇女的其他照护模式的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 28;4(4):CD004667. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004667.pub5.
10
The closure of rural and remote maternity services: Where are the midwives?农村及偏远地区产妇服务的终止:助产士都去哪儿了?
Midwifery. 2016 Jul;38:9-11. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2016.03.007. Epub 2016 Mar 20.