• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

培训临床专业人员在医疗保健环境中提供以患者为中心的干预措施。

Training clinical professionals to deliver a patient centered intervention in healthcare settings.

机构信息

U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System, HSR & D Center of Innovation, Center for Mental Healthcare & Outcomes Research, 2200 Fort Roots Drive, North Little Rock, AR, 72114, USA.

Saint Louis University, School of Social Work, 3500 Lindell Blvd, Saint Louis, MO, 63103, USA.

出版信息

BMC Med Educ. 2024 Oct 13;24(1):1134. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06151-1.

DOI:10.1186/s12909-024-06151-1
PMID:39396986
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11472517/
Abstract

Within the healthcare settings of the United States Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), one patient-centered intervention, Advance Care Planning via Group Visits (ACP-GV), engages veterans and those they trust in advance care planning (ACP) by facilitating a discussion that encourages participants to plan for future healthcare needs. ACP-GV is a one-hour, single session group intervention facilitated by a trained clinical professional (e.g., physician, nurse, social worker, psychologist, chaplain) and delivered in a healthcare or community-based setting. Using reporting guidelines for group-based and educational interventions, this paper aims to describe the ACP-GV Facilitator Training used to prepare clinical professionals to offer the ACP-GV intervention to participants. We provide health professional students and early career health professionals with an overview of the training and key tips for using group modalities in the clinical setting. Although the training is initially directed towards health professionals who are learning to offer ACP-GV for the first time, our tips for teaching also focus on and extend to facilitating ACP-GV directly with veterans, caregivers, and those they trust. The ACP-GV Facilitator Training is sequential in that it expects clinicians to first learn the required educational content and how to plan a group, then it engages clinicians in practicing group facilitation skills. At the conclusion of the training, clinicians are then instructed to use the training materials to transfer the information and skills they learned about ACP-GV to patients they encounter in their respective work settings. The culmination of the ACP-GV Facilitator Training is, therefore, when the clinician is able to facilitate their own group, guide discussions and activities, actively use training materials, and encourage veterans and those they trust to participate in a discussion regarding ACP in a group setting. Finally, we share key resources for publicly available and accessible online trainings to promote spread outside of VA. ACP-GV's Facilitator Training can assist healthcare professionals in implementing ACP-GV in a variety of care settings.

摘要

在美国退伍军人事务部(VA)的医疗保健环境中,有一种以患者为中心的干预措施,即通过小组访问进行预先护理计划(ACP-GV),通过促进讨论来吸引退伍军人及其信任的人参与预先护理计划(ACP),鼓励参与者规划未来的医疗需求。ACP-GV 是一种由经过培训的临床专业人员(例如医生、护士、社会工作者、心理学家、牧师)主持的、时长为一小时的单一小组干预措施,在医疗保健或社区环境中进行。本文件使用针对基于小组和教育干预的报告准则,旨在描述 ACP-GV 促进者培训,以培训临床专业人员为参与者提供 ACP-GV 干预。我们为卫生专业学生和初级卫生专业人员提供培训概述以及在临床环境中使用小组模式的关键提示。尽管该培训最初是针对首次学习提供 ACP-GV 的卫生专业人员,但我们的教学提示也侧重于并扩展到直接与退伍军人、护理人员和他们信任的人一起促进 ACP-GV。ACP-GV 促进者培训是按顺序进行的,它期望临床医生首先学习所需的教育内容和如何计划小组,然后让临床医生练习小组促进技能。培训结束后,临床医生会被指示使用培训材料将他们在 ACP-GV 中学到的信息和技能转移到他们在各自工作环境中遇到的患者身上。因此,ACP-GV 促进者培训的高潮是,当临床医生能够促进自己的小组、指导讨论和活动、积极使用培训材料并鼓励退伍军人及其信任的人在小组环境中参与 ACP 讨论时。最后,我们分享了可公开获取的在线培训的关键资源,以促进 VA 之外的推广。ACP-GV 的促进者培训可以帮助医疗保健专业人员在各种护理环境中实施 ACP-GV。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/384e/11472517/b21912dcd981/12909_2024_6151_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/384e/11472517/0bc93a073bda/12909_2024_6151_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/384e/11472517/b21912dcd981/12909_2024_6151_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/384e/11472517/0bc93a073bda/12909_2024_6151_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/384e/11472517/b21912dcd981/12909_2024_6151_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Training clinical professionals to deliver a patient centered intervention in healthcare settings.培训临床专业人员在医疗保健环境中提供以患者为中心的干预措施。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Oct 13;24(1):1134. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06151-1.
2
Application of motivational interviewing to group: Teaching advance care planning via group visits for clinical professionals.动机性访谈在团体中的应用:通过为临床专业人员进行团体访视来教授预先护理计划。
Patient Educ Couns. 2024 Mar;120:108116. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.108116. Epub 2023 Dec 14.
3
Adopting the RE-AIM analytic framework for rural program evaluation: experiences from the Advance Care Planning via Group Visits (ACP-GV) national evaluation.采用RE-AIM分析框架进行农村项目评估:通过小组访谈进行预先护理计划(ACP-GV)全国评估的经验
Front Health Serv. 2024 Mar 25;4:1210166. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2024.1210166. eCollection 2024.
4
A systematic review of the effects of advance care planning facilitators training programs.对预先护理计划促进者培训项目效果的系统评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jun 7;19(1):362. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4192-0.
5
Evaluation of the national implementation of the VA Diffusion of Excellence Initiative on Advance Care Planning via Group Visits: protocol for a quality improvement evaluation.通过小组访谈对退伍军人事务部卓越推进护理计划国家实施情况的评估:质量改进评估方案
Implement Sci Commun. 2020 Feb 27;1:19. doi: 10.1186/s43058-020-00016-6. eCollection 2020.
6
"Advancing" Advance Care Planning to Veterans in the Veterans Health Administration.向退伍军人健康管理局的退伍军人推进预先护理规划。
Mil Med. 2023 Mar 20;188(3-4):786-791. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usac196.
7
Experiences with a national team-based learning program for advance care planning in pediatric palliative care.国家团队为儿科临终关怀的预先医疗指示计划所进行的学习经验。
BMC Palliat Care. 2024 Aug 3;23(1):196. doi: 10.1186/s12904-024-01515-2.
8
Patient-centered and efficacious advance care planning in cancer: Protocol and key design considerations for the PEACe-compare trial.以患者为中心且有效的癌症预后计划:PEACe-compare 试验的方案和主要设计考虑因素。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2020 Sep;96:106071. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2020.106071. Epub 2020 Jul 31.
9
Effect of the PREPARE Website vs an Easy-to-Read Advance Directive on Advance Care Planning Documentation and Engagement Among Veterans: A Randomized Clinical Trial.PREPARE网站与易读的预立医疗指示对退伍军人预立医疗照护计划文件记录及参与度的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Aug 1;177(8):1102-1109. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.1607.
10
A model for community-led peer-facilitated advance care planning workshops for the public.一个由社区主导、同伴协助的面向公众的预先护理计划研讨会模型。
Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2023 Nov 29;17:26323524231212515. doi: 10.1177/26323524231212515. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Application of motivational interviewing to group: Teaching advance care planning via group visits for clinical professionals.动机性访谈在团体中的应用:通过为临床专业人员进行团体访视来教授预先护理计划。
Patient Educ Couns. 2024 Mar;120:108116. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.108116. Epub 2023 Dec 14.
2
Integrating the Age-Friendly Health Systems Movement in Veterans Health Administration: National Advance Care Planning via Group Visits and the 4Ms Framework.将关爱老年人的健康系统运动融入退伍军人健康管理局:通过小组访问和4M框架进行全国性的预先护理规划。
Health Soc Work. 2023 Oct 27;48(4):277-280. doi: 10.1093/hsw/hlad022.
3
Advance Care Planning in an Accountable Care Organization Is Associated with Increased Advanced Directive Documentation and Decreased Costs.
在责任医疗组织中进行预先医疗指示规划与增加先进医疗指示文件和降低成本有关。
J Palliat Med. 2018 Apr;21(4):489-502. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2017.0566. Epub 2017 Dec 5.
4
Development and validation of the guideline for reporting evidence-based practice educational interventions and teaching (GREET).基于证据的实践教育干预与教学报告指南(GREET)的制定与验证
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Sep 6;16(1):237. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0759-1.
5
A checklist to improve reporting of group-based behaviour-change interventions.一份用于改进基于群体的行为改变干预措施报告的清单。
BMC Public Health. 2015 Sep 25;15:963. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2300-6.
6
Inclusion and exclusion criteria in randomized controlled trials of psychotherapy for PTSD.创伤后应激障碍心理治疗随机对照试验中的纳入和排除标准。
J Psychiatr Pract. 2014 Jan;20(1):25-37. doi: 10.1097/01.pra.0000442936.23457.5b.
7
Advance care planning and the quality of end-of-life care in older adults.老年患者的预先医疗照护计划和临终关怀质量。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013 Feb;61(2):209-14. doi: 10.1111/jgs.12105. Epub 2013 Jan 25.
8
Ten things that motivational interviewing is not.动机性访谈不是的十件事。
Behav Cogn Psychother. 2009 Mar;37(2):129-40. doi: 10.1017/S1352465809005128.
9
The transtheoretical model of health behavior change.健康行为改变的跨理论模型。
Am J Health Promot. 1997 Sep-Oct;12(1):38-48. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-12.1.38.