Young Gary J, Zhu Tianjie, Hasan Md Mahmudul, Alinezhad Farbod, Young Leonard D, Noor-E-Alam Md
Center for Health Policy and Healthcare Research, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA.
Bouve College of Health Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA.
Addiction. 2025 Jan;120(1):152-163. doi: 10.1111/add.16684. Epub 2024 Oct 13.
Opioid use disorder (OUD) is treatable with buprenorphine/naloxone (buprenorphine), but many patients discontinue treatment prematurely. The aim of this study was to assess the influence of patient- and prescriber-level characteristics relative to several patient outcomes following the initiation of buprenorphine treatment for OUD.
This was a retrospective observational investigation. We used the Public Health Data Warehouse from the Massachusetts Department of Public Health to construct a sample of patients who initiated buprenorphine treatment between 2015 and 2019. We attributed each patient to a prescriber based on information from prescription claims. We used multilevel models to assess the influence of patient- and prescriber-level characteristics on each outcome.
Massachusetts, USA.
The study cohort comprised 37 955 unique patients and 2146 prescribers. Among patients, 64.6% were male, 52.6% were under the age of 35 and 82.2% were White, non-Hispanic. For insurance coverage, 72.1% had Medicaid.
The outcome measures were poor medication continuity, treatment discontinuation and opioid overdose, all assessed within a 12-month follow-up period that began with a focal prescription for buprenorphine. Each patient had a single follow-up period. Poor medication continuity was defined as medication gaps totaling more than 7 days during the initial 180 days of buprenorphine treatment and treatment discontinuation was defined as having a medication gap for 2 consecutive months within the 12-month follow-up period.
The patient-level rates for poor medication continuity, treatment discontinuation and opioid overdose were 59.7% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 59.2-60.2], 57.4% (95% CI = 56.9-57.9) and 10.3% (95% CI = 10.0-10.6), respectively, with 1.1% (95% CI = 1.0-1.2) experiencing a fatal opioid overdose. At the patient level, after adjustment for covariates, adverse outcomes were associated with race/ethnicity as both Black, non-Hispanic and Hispanic patients had worse outcomes than did White, non-Hispanic patients (Black, non-Hispanic -- poor continuity: 1.50, 95% CI = 1.34-1.68; discontinuation: 1.44, 95% CI = 1.30-1.60; Hispanic -- poor continuity: 1.21, 95% CI = 1.12-1.31; discontinuation: 1.38, 95% CI = 1.28-1.48). Patients with insurance coverage through Medicaid also had worse outcomes than those with commercial insurance (poor continuity: 1.18, 95% CI = 1.11-1.26; discontinuation: 1.09, 95% CI = 1.03-1.16; overdose: 1.98, 95% CI = 1.75-2.23). Pre-treatment mental health conditions and other types of chronic illness were also associated with worse outcomes (History of mental health conditions -- poor continuity: 1.11, 95% CI = 1.06-1.17; discontinuation: 1.05, CI = 1.01-1.10; overdose: 1.47, 95% CI = 1.36-1.60; Chronic health conditions -- poor continuity: 1.15, 95% CI = 1.05-1.27; discontinuation: 1.15, 95% CI = 1.05-1.26; overdose: 1.83, 95% CI = 1.60-2.10; History of substance use disorder other than for opioids -- poor continuity: 1.54, 95% CI = 1.46-1.62; discontinuation: 1.54, 95% CI = 1.47-1.62; overdose: 1.93, 95% CI = 1.80-2.07). At the prescriber level, after adjustments for covariates, adverse outcomes were associated with clinical training, as primary care physicians had higher rates of adverse outcomes than psychiatrists (poor continuity: 1.12, 95% CI = 1.02-1.23; discontinuation: 1.04, 95% CI = 1.01-1.09). A larger prescriber panel size, based on number of patients being prescribed buprenorphine, was also associated with higher rates of adverse outcomes (poor continuity: 1.36, 95% CI = 1.27-1.46; discontinuation: 1.21, 95% CI = 1.14-1.28; overdose: 1.10, 95% CI = 1.01-1.19). Between 9% and 15% of the variation among patients for the outcomes was accounted for at the prescriber level.
Patient- and prescriber-level characteristics appear to be associated with patient outcomes following buprenorphine treatment for opioid use disorder. In particular, patients' race/ethnicity and insurance coverage appear to be associated with substantial disparities in outcomes, and prescriber characteristics appear to be most closely associated with medication continuity during early treatment.
阿片类物质使用障碍(OUD)可用丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮(丁丙诺啡)进行治疗,但许多患者过早中断治疗。本研究的目的是评估在开始使用丁丙诺啡治疗OUD后,患者层面和处方医生层面的特征对几种患者结局的影响。
这是一项回顾性观察性研究。我们使用马萨诸塞州公共卫生部的公共卫生数据仓库构建了一个2015年至2019年间开始使用丁丙诺啡治疗的患者样本。我们根据处方报销信息将每位患者与一位处方医生进行匹配。我们使用多层模型来评估患者层面和处方医生层面的特征对每种结局的影响。
美国马萨诸塞州。
研究队列包括37955名不同的患者和2146名处方医生。在患者中,64.6%为男性,52.6%年龄在35岁以下,82.2%为非西班牙裔白人。在保险覆盖方面,72.1%的患者拥有医疗补助。
结局指标为用药持续性差、治疗中断和阿片类物质过量,所有这些指标均在以丁丙诺啡的一次重点处方开始的12个月随访期内进行评估。每位患者有一个单一的随访期。用药持续性差定义为在丁丙诺啡治疗的最初180天内药物中断总计超过7天,治疗中断定义为在12个月随访期内连续2个月有药物中断。
患者层面用药持续性差、治疗中断和阿片类物质过量的发生率分别为59.7% [可信区间(CI)= 59.2 - 60.2]、57.4%(95% CI = 56.9 - 57.9)和10.3%(95% CI = 10.0 - 10.6),1.1%(95% CI = 1.0 - 1.2)的患者发生致命性阿片类物质过量。在患者层面,调整协变量后,不良结局与种族/族裔相关,因为非西班牙裔黑人患者和西班牙裔患者的结局均比非西班牙裔白人患者差(非西班牙裔黑人——用药持续性差:1.50,95% CI = 1.34 - 1.68;治疗中断:1.44,95% CI = 1.30 - 1.60;西班牙裔——用药持续性差:1.21,95% CI = 1.12 - 1.31;治疗中断:1.38,95% CI = 1.28 - 1.48)。通过医疗补助获得保险覆盖的患者结局也比拥有商业保险的患者差(用药持续性差:1.18,95% CI = 1.11 - 1.26;治疗中断:1.09,95% CI = 1.03 - 1.16;过量:1.98,95% CI = 1.75 - 2.23)。治疗前的心理健康状况和其他类型的慢性病也与更差的结局相关(心理健康状况史——用药持续性差:1.11,95% CI = 1.06 - 1.17;治疗中断:1.05,CI = 1.01 - 1.10;过量:1.47,95% CI = 1.36 - 1.60;慢性健康状况——用药持续性差:1.15,95% CI = 1.05 - 1.27;治疗中断:1.15,95% CI = 1.05 - 1.26;过量:1.83,95% CI = 1.60 - 2.10;除阿片类物质外的物质使用障碍史——用药持续性差:1.54,95% CI = 1.46 - 1.62;治疗中断:1.54,95% CI = 1.47 - 1.62;过量:1.93,95% CI = 1.80 - 2.07)。在处方医生层面,调整协变量后,不良结局与临床培训相关,因为初级保健医生的不良结局发生率高于精神科医生(用药持续性差:1.12,95% CI = 1.02 - 1.23;治疗中断:1.04,95% CI = 1.01 - 1.09)。根据开具丁丙诺啡的患者数量计算,更大的处方医生服务对象规模也与更高的不良结局发生率相关(用药持续性差:1.36,95% CI = 1.27 - 1.46;治疗中断:1.21,95% CI = 1.14 - 1.28;过量:1.10,95% CI = 1.01 - 1.19)。在处方医生层面,9%至15%的患者结局差异可归因于此。
患者层面和处方医生层面的特征似乎与丁丙诺啡治疗阿片类物质使用障碍后的患者结局相关。特别是,患者的种族/族裔和保险覆盖情况似乎与结局的显著差异相关,而处方医生的特征似乎与早期治疗期间的用药持续性最为密切相关。