Department of Medicine, Section of Infectious Diseases, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Department of Healthcare Policy & Research, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2018 Feb;85:90-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2017.07.001. Epub 2017 Jul 3.
We investigated prescribing patterns for four opioid use disorder (OUD) medications: 1) injectable naltrexone, 2) oral naltrexone, 3) sublingual or oralmucosal buprenorphine/naloxone, and 4) sublingual buprenorphine as well as transdermal buprenorphine (which is approved for treating pain, but not OUD) in a nationally representative claims-based database (Truven Health MarketScan®) of commercially insured individuals in the United States. We calculated the prevalence of OUD in the database for each year from 2010 to 2014 and the proportion of diagnosed patient months on OUD medication. We compared characteristics of individuals diagnosed with OUD who did and did not receive these medications with bivariate descriptive statistics. Finally, we fit a Cox proportional hazards model of time to discontinuation of therapy as a function of therapy type, controlling for relevant confounders. From 2010 to 2014, the proportion of commercially insured individuals diagnosed with OUD grew by fourfold (0.12% to 0.48%), but the proportion of diagnosed patient-months on medication decreased from 25% in 2010 (0.05% injectable naltrexone, 0.4% oral naltrexone, 23.1% sublingual or oralmucosal buprenorphine/naloxone, 1.5% sublingual buprenorphine, and 0% transdermal buprenorphine) to 16% in 2014 (0.2% injectable naltrexone, 0.4% oral naltrexone, 13.8% sublingual or oralmucosal buprenorphine/naloxone, 1.4% sublingual buprenorphine, and 0.3% transdermal buprenorphine). Individuals who received medication therapy were more likely to be male, younger, and have an additional substance use disorder compared with those diagnosed with OUD who did not receive medication therapy. Those prescribed injectable naltrexone were more often male, younger, and diagnosed with additional substance use disorders compared with those prescribed other medications for opioid use disorder (MOUDs). At 30 days after initiation, 52% for individuals treated with injectable naltrexone, 70% for individuals treated with oral naltrexone, 31% for individuals treated with sublingual or oralmucosal buprenorphine/naloxone, 58% for individuals treated with sublingual buprenorphine, and 51% for individuals treated with transdermal buprenorphine discontinued treatment. In the Cox proportional hazard model, use of injectable naltrexone, oral naltrexone, sublingual buprenorphine, and transdermal buprenorphine were all associated with significantly greater hazard of discontinuing therapy beginning >30days after MOUD initiation (HR=2.17, 2.54, 1.15, and 2.21, respectively, 95% CIs 2.04-2.30, 2.45-2.64, 1.10-1.19, and 2.11-2.33), compared with the use of sublingual or oralmucosal buprenorphine/naloxone. This analysis demonstrates that the use of evidence-based medication therapies has not kept pace with increases in OUD diagnoses in commercially insured populations in the United States. Among those who have been treated, discontinuation rates >30days after initiation are high. The proportion treated with injectable naltrexone, oral naltrexone, and transdermal buprenorphine grew over time but remains small, and the discontinuation rates are higher among those treated with these medications compared with those treated with sublingual or oralmucosal buprenorphine/naloxone. In the face of the opioid overdose and addiction crisis, new efforts are needed at the provider, health system, and policy levels so that MOUD availability and uptake keep pace with new OUD diagnoses and OUD treatment discontinuation is minimized.
我们在一个基于美国商业保险人群的全国代表性索赔数据库(Truven Health MarketScan®)中,对四种阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)药物的处方模式进行了调查:1)注射用纳曲酮;2)口服纳曲酮;3)舌下或口腔粘膜丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮;4)丁丙诺啡舌下制剂和经皮丁丙诺啡(经批准用于治疗疼痛,但不用于 OUD)。我们计算了数据库中每年(2010 年至 2014 年)OUD 的患病率,以及诊断为 OUD 患者接受药物治疗的月数比例。我们使用双变量描述性统计比较了诊断为 OUD 并接受和未接受这些药物治疗的个体的特征。最后,我们拟合了一个 Cox 比例风险模型,将治疗的停药时间作为治疗类型的函数,控制了相关的混杂因素。从 2010 年至 2014 年,商业保险人群中诊断为 OUD 的比例增加了四倍(0.12%至 0.48%),但接受药物治疗的患者月数比例从 2010 年的 25%下降到 2014 年的 16%(0.2%注射用纳曲酮、0.4%口服纳曲酮、23.1%舌下或口腔粘膜丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮、1.4%丁丙诺啡舌下制剂和 0%经皮丁丙诺啡)。接受药物治疗的个体更可能是男性、年轻且患有其他物质使用障碍,而与未接受药物治疗的诊断为 OUD 的个体相比。与其他用于治疗 OUD(MOUD)的药物相比,接受注射用纳曲酮治疗的个体更可能是男性、年轻且患有其他物质使用障碍。在开始治疗后 30 天,接受注射用纳曲酮治疗的个体中有 52%、接受口服纳曲酮治疗的个体中有 70%、接受舌下或口腔粘膜丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮治疗的个体中有 31%、接受丁丙诺啡舌下制剂治疗的个体中有 58%、接受经皮丁丙诺啡治疗的个体中有 51%停止治疗。在 Cox 比例风险模型中,使用注射用纳曲酮、口服纳曲酮、丁丙诺啡舌下制剂和经皮丁丙诺啡治疗与 MOUD 开始后 >30 天开始治疗的显著更高的停药风险相关(HR=2.17、2.54、1.15 和 2.21,95%CI 分别为 2.04-2.30、2.45-2.64、1.10-1.19 和 2.11-2.33),与使用舌下或口腔粘膜丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮治疗相比。这项分析表明,在美国商业保险人群中,阿片类药物使用障碍的诊断增加,但证据为基础的药物治疗的使用并没有跟上。在接受治疗的人群中,开始治疗后 30 天以上的停药率较高。接受注射用纳曲酮、口服纳曲酮和经皮丁丙诺啡治疗的比例随着时间的推移而增加,但仍然很小,与接受舌下或口腔粘膜丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮治疗的个体相比,接受这些药物治疗的个体的停药率更高。在阿片类药物过量和成瘾危机面前,需要在提供者、卫生系统和政策层面做出新的努力,以确保 MOUD 的可及性和采用与新的 OUD 诊断保持一致,并最大限度地减少 OUD 治疗的停药。