Park Ji Hwan, Jeong Hyeok Jun, Lee Ka Eun, Lee Hong Sub, Yu Seung Jung, Yoon Jun Sik, Choi Eun Jeong, Park Jung Ho, Bang Ki Bae, Kim Ju Seok, Kim Yong Sung
College of Medicine, Inje University, Busan, Korea.
Department of Internal Medicine, Inje University Busan Paik Hospital, Busan, Korea.
J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2024 Oct 30;30(4):491-500. doi: 10.5056/jnm22067.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: In Korea, changes in the prevalence of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) after the Rome IV update have not been extensively studied. The aim of this study is to compare the prevalence and psychosocial risk factors of IBS according to Rome III and Rome IV criteria in medical and nursing students.
From August 13, 2021 to October 22, 2021, participants were enrolled and surveyed online. The survey includes general and specific questions for disease diagnosis and regarding participants' social and psychological characteristics using the 36-item short form survey, the Brief Encounter Psychosocial Instrument-Korean version, and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale.
In total, 338 medical students and 102 nursing students completed the survey. IBS was diagnosed in 78 students (17.7%) using Rome III criteria and in 51 students (11.6%) using Rome IV criteria. Significant differences in physical functioning score and severity score were observed between patients diagnosed using Rome IV criteria and patients diagnosed using Rome III criteria. Multiple logistic regression revealed that severity score (adjusted odds ratio = 1.01; 95% confidence interval: 1.00-1.21; = 0.022) is the only predictor of IBS that differentiates Rome IV criteria from Rome III criteria.
Even after updating the Rome IV diagnostic criteria, the prevalence of IBS in medical and nursing students in Korea remained high. Patients who met the Rome IV criteria had more severe symptoms and lower quality of life than patients who met the Rome III criteria.
背景/目的:在韩国,罗马IV标准更新后肠易激综合征(IBS)患病率的变化尚未得到广泛研究。本研究旨在比较根据罗马III和罗马IV标准,医学和护理专业学生中IBS的患病率及社会心理风险因素。
2021年8月13日至2021年10月22日,招募参与者并进行在线调查。该调查包括用于疾病诊断的一般和特定问题,以及使用36项简式调查问卷、韩国版简短心理社会评估工具和医院焦虑抑郁量表询问参与者的社会和心理特征。
共有338名医学生和102名护生完成了调查。根据罗马III标准,78名学生(17.7%)被诊断为IBS;根据罗马IV标准,51名学生(11.6%)被诊断为IBS。在根据罗马IV标准诊断的患者和根据罗马III标准诊断的患者之间,观察到身体功能评分和严重程度评分存在显著差异。多因素逻辑回归显示,严重程度评分(调整后的优势比=1.01;95%置信区间:1.00 - 1.21;P = 0.022)是区分罗马IV标准和罗马III标准的IBS唯一预测因素。
即使更新了罗马IV诊断标准,韩国医学和护理专业学生中IBS的患病率仍然很高。符合罗马IV标准的患者比符合罗马III标准的患者症状更严重,生活质量更低。