Boisvert Mélanie, Dugré Jules R, Potvin Stéphane
Research Center of the Institut Universitaire en Santé Mentale de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.
Department of Psychiatry and Addictology, Faculty of medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada.
Psychol Med. 2024 Oct 14;54(13):1-12. doi: 10.1017/S003329172400165X.
Studies suggest severe mental disorders (SMDs), such as schizophrenia, major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder, are associated with common alterations in brain activity, albeit with a graded level of impairment. However, discrepancies between study findings likely to results from both small sample sizes and the use of different functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) tasks. To address these issues, data-driven meta-analytic approach designed to identify homogeneous brain co-activity patterns across tasks was conducted to better characterize the common and distinct alterations between these disorders.
A hierarchical clustering analysis was conducted to identify groups of studies reporting similar neuroimaging results, independent of task type and psychiatric diagnosis. A traditional meta-analysis (activation likelihood estimation) was then performed within each of these groups of studies to extract their aberrant activation maps.
A total of 762 fMRI study contrasts were targeted, comprising 13 991 patients with SMDs. Hierarchical clustering analysis identified 5 groups of studies (meta-analytic groupings; MAGs) being characterized by distinct aberrant activation patterns across SMDs: (1) emotion processing; (2) cognitive processing; (3) motor processes, (4) reward processing, and (5) visual processing. While MAG1 was mostly commonly impaired, MAG2 was more impaired in schizophrenia, while MAG3 and MAG5 revealed no differences between disorder. MAG4 showed the strongest between-diagnoses differences, particularly in the striatum, posterior cingulate cortex, and ventromedial prefrontal cortex.
SMDs are characterized mostly by common deficits in brain networks, although differences between disorders are also present. This study highlights the importance of studying SMDs simultaneously rather than independently.
研究表明,精神分裂症、重度抑郁症和双相情感障碍等严重精神障碍(SMD)与大脑活动的常见改变有关,尽管损害程度不同。然而,研究结果之间的差异可能是由于样本量小和使用不同的功能磁共振成像(fMRI)任务所致。为了解决这些问题,采用了数据驱动的荟萃分析方法,旨在识别跨任务的同质大脑共同活动模式,以更好地表征这些障碍之间的共同和不同改变。
进行分层聚类分析,以识别报告相似神经影像学结果的研究组,而不考虑任务类型和精神科诊断。然后在每组研究中进行传统的荟萃分析(激活可能性估计),以提取其异常激活图。
总共针对762项fMRI研究对比,包括13991例SMD患者。分层聚类分析确定了5组研究(荟萃分析分组;MAG),其特征是跨SMD的不同异常激活模式:(1)情绪处理;(2)认知处理;(3)运动过程;(4)奖励处理;(5)视觉处理。虽然MAG1最常受损,但MAG2在精神分裂症中受损更严重,而MAG3和MAG5在不同障碍之间没有差异。MAG4显示出诊断之间最强的差异,特别是在纹状体、后扣带回皮质和腹内侧前额叶皮质。
SMD的主要特征是大脑网络普遍存在缺陷,尽管不同障碍之间也存在差异。这项研究强调了同时而非独立研究SMD的重要性。