• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

考虑利他偏好的能源绩效合同的斯塔克尔伯格博弈分析

Stackelberg game analysis of the energy performance contracting considering altruistic preferences.

作者信息

Li Changmin, Zhang Xun, Li Shengnan, Xie Xiaoqiang

机构信息

School of Management, Shanghai University, Shanghai, 200444, China.

School of Mathematics, Physics and Statistics, Shanghai Polytechnic University, Shanghai, 201209, China.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2024 Sep 25;10(19):e38408. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38408. eCollection 2024 Oct 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38408
PMID:39397990
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11467540/
Abstract

The Stackelberg game analysis of an Energy Performance Contracting(EPC) is established to correctly analyze the impact of altruistic preference behaviors on the decision-makers, energy service companies(ESCOs) and energy-consuming units(EUs). Its motivation comes from the fact that, to achieve a win-win situation, EUs usually engage in altruistic behaviors, but the implementation results of the EPC are always contrary to their expectations. Using nonlinear optimization theory, analyzed the decisions of the Stackelberg models under different altruistic preference attributes, and then compared the impacts of altruistic preferences on decisions and profits. Results reveal: (1)compared to a situation lacking altruistic preference, when the leader, the EU, has an altruistic preference, the EU only needs to transfer a small part of its own interests to significantly increase the ESCO's profit and ultimately improve the overall EPC profit; (2) the altruistic preference of the ESCO functions akin to a "poison," engrossing the company in the satisfaction derived from the increased revenue of the energy-consuming entity and gradually eroding its own profits; and (3)the altruistic preference behavior of both parties is a kind of "benefit transfer behavior," which is conducive to stable operation and long-term development of EPC industry. The research results can provide a theoretical reference to enhance the development of energy-saving service industry.

摘要

建立了能源绩效合同(EPC)的斯塔克尔伯格博弈分析,以正确分析利他偏好行为对决策者、能源服务公司(ESCO)和能源消费单位(EU)的影响。其动机源于这样一个事实,即欧盟为了实现双赢局面,通常会采取利他行为,但EPC的实施结果却总是与他们的预期相悖。利用非线性优化理论,分析了不同利他偏好属性下斯塔克尔伯格模型的决策,然后比较了利他偏好对决策和利润的影响。结果表明:(1)与缺乏利他偏好的情况相比,当领导者欧盟具有利他偏好时,欧盟只需转移一小部分自身利益,就能显著提高ESCO的利润,最终提高EPC的整体利润;(2)ESCO的利他偏好起到了“毒药”的作用,使公司沉迷于能源消费实体收入增加带来的满足感,逐渐侵蚀自身利润;(3)双方的利他偏好行为是一种“利益转移行为”,有利于EPC行业的稳定运营和长期发展。研究结果可为促进节能服务业发展提供理论参考。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f24e/11467540/985454ab47f5/gr8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f24e/11467540/9eb194eee31f/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f24e/11467540/a5e56ed643c4/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f24e/11467540/afc74e05a497/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f24e/11467540/5ca56c3671a1/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f24e/11467540/64a21662fbc9/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f24e/11467540/3265bbd7b81b/gr6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f24e/11467540/d85c9a4ef8ff/gr7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f24e/11467540/985454ab47f5/gr8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f24e/11467540/9eb194eee31f/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f24e/11467540/a5e56ed643c4/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f24e/11467540/afc74e05a497/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f24e/11467540/5ca56c3671a1/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f24e/11467540/64a21662fbc9/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f24e/11467540/3265bbd7b81b/gr6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f24e/11467540/d85c9a4ef8ff/gr7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f24e/11467540/985454ab47f5/gr8.jpg

相似文献

1
Stackelberg game analysis of the energy performance contracting considering altruistic preferences.考虑利他偏好的能源绩效合同的斯塔克尔伯格博弈分析
Heliyon. 2024 Sep 25;10(19):e38408. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38408. eCollection 2024 Oct 15.
2
Greenness and Pricing Decisions of Cooperative Supply Chains Considering Altruistic Preferences.考虑利他偏好的合作供应链的绿色度和定价决策。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Dec 26;16(1):51. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16010051.
3
Supply chain joint emission reduction differential decisions and coordination considering altruistic behavior and reference low-carbon effect.考虑利他行为和参考低碳效应的供应链联合减排差异决策与协调。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Mar;29(15):22325-22349. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-16901-z. Epub 2021 Nov 16.
4
Energy-saving and pricing decisions in a sustainable supply chain considering behavioral concerns.考虑行为因素的可持续供应链中的节能与定价决策。
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 4;15(8):e0236354. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236354. eCollection 2020.
5
Research on Pricing and Service Level Strategies of Dual Channel Reverse Supply Chain Considering Consumer Preference in Multi-Regional Situations.多区域环境下考虑消费者偏好的双渠道逆向供应链定价与服务水平策略研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 7;17(23):9143. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17239143.
6
Pricing Policies of Green Dual-Channel Supply Chain with Fairness Concerns and Altruistic Preferences Based on Consumers' Environmental Awareness and Channel Preference.考虑消费者环境意识和渠道偏好的公平关切和利他偏好的绿色双渠道供应链定价策略。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 19;19(20):13564. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192013564.
7
On Conflicts between Pharmaceutical Patent Protection and the Right to Life and Health Based on a Stackelberg Game.基于 Stackelberg 博弈的药品专利保护与生命健康权冲突研究
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 27;18(3):1119. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18031119.
8
Computational and Neurobiological Substrates of Cost-Benefit Integration in Altruistic Helping Decision.利他主义助人决策中的成本效益整合的计算神经生物学基础
J Neurosci. 2021 Apr 14;41(15):3545-3561. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1939-20.2021. Epub 2021 Mar 5.
9
The impact of network externalities and altruistic preferences on carbon emission reduction of low carbon supply chain.网络外部性和利他偏好对低碳供应链减排的影响。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Sep;29(44):66259-66276. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-20459-9. Epub 2022 May 2.
10
Stackelberg Game-Based Power Allocation for V2X Communications.基于 Stackelberg 博弈的车对车通信功率分配
Sensors (Basel). 2019 Dec 20;20(1):58. doi: 10.3390/s20010058.

本文引用的文献

1
The Practice of Feedback in Health Professions Education in the Hierarchical and Collectivistic Culture: a Scoping Review.等级制和集体主义文化背景下卫生专业教育中的反馈实践:一项范围综述
Med Sci Educ. 2022 Aug 4;32(5):1219-1229. doi: 10.1007/s40670-022-01597-8. eCollection 2022 Oct.
2
Greenness and Pricing Decisions of Cooperative Supply Chains Considering Altruistic Preferences.考虑利他偏好的合作供应链的绿色度和定价决策。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Dec 26;16(1):51. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16010051.