Ledford Dennis K, Carr Warner W, Moore Wendy C, Lugogo Njira L, Mohan Arjun, Chipps Bradley, Mackie Alexander R, Lindsley Andrew W, Spahn Joseph, Ambrose Christopher S
Division of Allergy and Immunology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.
Allergy & Asthma Associates of Southern California, Mission Viejo, CA, USA.
J Asthma Allergy. 2024 Oct 9;17:977-982. doi: 10.2147/JAA.S476774. eCollection 2024.
Younger age of asthma onset (AAO) has been associated with an allergic phenotype, whereas eosinophilic phenotypes have been associated with older AAO. In randomized trials, biologic efficacy among adults with severe asthma (SA) has varied by age at asthma onset. To determine whether these associations observed in trials apply to real-world outcomes, this study examined biologic effectiveness by AAO and biologic class in a large, real-world cohort.
CHRONICLE is an ongoing, real-world study of US adults with subspecialist-treated SA receiving biologics, maintenance corticosteroids, or who are uncontrolled on high-dosage inhaled corticosteroids with additional controllers. Patients enrolled between February 2018 and February 2022 who initiated a biologic for SA and had complete data for analysis were included. A locally estimated scatterplot smoothing (LOESS) analysis was used to plot the relationship between percentage exacerbation rate reduction and AAO by biologic class.
Of 578 patients with complete data, 198, 149, and 231 were diagnosed with asthma at age <18, 18-39, and ≥40 years, respectively. Across subgroups, patients were predominantly White (72-78%), female (67-73%), and commercially insured (54-71%). In the LOESS analysis, exacerbation rate reductions were similar for anti-IgE and anti-IL-5/5R and anti-IL-4R subgroups with younger AAO, but the exacerbation rate reduction diminished for patients with older AAO receiving anti-IgE therapy, particularly with asthma onset age ≥40 years.
Clinicians should consider age of onset in biologic treatment decisions, given reduced effectiveness of omalizumab in patients with asthma onset at age ≥40 years.
NCT03373045.
哮喘发病年龄(AAO)较小与过敏表型相关,而嗜酸性粒细胞表型与较晚的AAO相关。在随机试验中,重度哮喘(SA)成人患者中生物制剂的疗效因哮喘发病年龄而异。为了确定在试验中观察到的这些关联是否适用于实际临床结果,本研究在一个大型真实世界队列中按AAO和生物制剂类别检查了生物制剂的有效性。
CHRONICLE是一项正在进行的针对美国患有SA且接受生物制剂、维持性皮质类固醇治疗,或在高剂量吸入皮质类固醇联合其他控制药物治疗下仍未得到控制的成人患者的真实世界研究。纳入2018年2月至2022年2月期间开始使用生物制剂治疗SA且有完整分析数据的患者。采用局部加权散点图平滑法(LOESS)分析按生物制剂类别划分的病情加重率降低百分比与AAO之间的关系。
在578例有完整数据的患者中,分别有198例、149例和231例在<18岁、18 - 39岁和≥40岁时被诊断为哮喘。在各亚组中,患者主要为白人(占比72 - 78%)、女性(占比67 - 73%)且有商业保险(占比54 - 71%)。在LOESS分析中,AAO较小的抗IgE、抗IL - 5/5R和抗IL - 4R亚组病情加重率降低情况相似,但接受抗IgE治疗且AAO较大的患者,尤其是哮喘发病年龄≥40岁的患者,病情加重率降低幅度减小。
鉴于奥马珠单抗在哮喘发病年龄≥40岁的患者中疗效降低,临床医生在生物制剂治疗决策中应考虑发病年龄。
NCT03373045。