• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

真实世界中重度哮喘生物制剂的应用和使用坚持度因生物制剂而异:CHRONICLE 研究结果。

Real-world severe asthma biologic administration and adherence differs by biologic: CHRONICLE study results.

机构信息

Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida.

AllerVie Health - Alabama Allergy and Asthma Center, Birmingham, Alabama.

出版信息

Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2023 Nov;131(5):598-605.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2023.07.017. Epub 2023 Jul 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.anai.2023.07.017
PMID:37506846
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patient adherence to biologic therapies is crucial for clinical benefits. Previous assessments of US patient adherence to severe asthma (SA) biologic therapies have relied on health care insurance claims data that have limitations.

OBJECTIVE

To describe real-world, specialist-reported, biologic administration and adherence among US adults with SA.

METHODS

CHRONICLE (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03373045) is an ongoing real-world, noninterventional study of patients with SA treated by US subspecialists. Sites report date and location for all biologic administrations. We evaluated biologic (benralizumab, dupilumab, mepolizumab, omalizumab, reslizumab) adherence as the proportion of days covered (PDC) during the first 52 weeks and the mean number of days until patients received the expected number of doses for 13, 26, and 52 weeks of treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 2117 patients received biologic administrations between February 2018 and February 2022. Most patients (84%) received biologic administrations at a subspecialist site. Over time, administrations at specialist sites decreased, whereas at-home administrations increased. The median PDC was 87%; the mean number of days to receive a 52-week (364-day) equivalent number of doses was 423 for all biologics (average delay of 58 days). Dupilumab had the lowest PDC and highest mean delays in dosing across all intervals; better adherence was observed among commercially insured patients.

CONCLUSION

Patients with SA are mostly adherent to biologic therapies. Biologics with shorter dosing intervals and at-home administration had worse adherence, likely because of greater opportunities for delays. Specialist-reported administration data provide a unique perspective on biologic adherence, which may be overestimated for at-home administrations by insurance claims data.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03373045.

摘要

背景

患者对生物疗法的依从性对于临床获益至关重要。先前对美国严重哮喘(SA)生物疗法患者依从性的评估依赖于医疗保健保险索赔数据,而这些数据存在局限性。

目的

描述美国成年 SA 患者真实世界中专家报告的生物制剂管理和依从性。

方法

CHRONICLE(ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT03373045)是一项正在进行的真实世界、非干预性研究,涉及由美国专家治疗的 SA 患者。各研究点报告所有生物制剂给药的日期和地点。我们评估了生物制剂(贝那鲁肽、度普利尤单抗、美泊利珠单抗、奥马珠单抗、瑞利珠单抗)的依从性,即第 1 至 52 周内的覆盖天数(PDC)比例,以及患者接受预期剂量的 13、26 和 52 周治疗的平均天数。

结果

2018 年 2 月至 2022 年 2 月期间,共有 2117 名患者接受了生物制剂给药。大多数患者(84%)在专科门诊接受生物制剂给药。随着时间的推移,专科门诊给药减少,而家庭给药增加。PDC 的中位数为 87%;所有生物制剂接受 52 周(364 天)等效剂量的平均天数为 423 天(平均延迟 58 天)。度普利尤单抗在所有时间间隔内的 PDC 最低,剂量延迟时间最长;商业保险患者的依从性更好。

结论

SA 患者对生物疗法的依从性较高。具有较短给药间隔和家庭给药的生物制剂依从性较差,这可能是由于延误的机会更多。专家报告的给药数据提供了对生物制剂依从性的独特视角,这可能因保险索赔数据对家庭给药的估计过高而产生偏差。

临床试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT03373045。

相似文献

1
Real-world severe asthma biologic administration and adherence differs by biologic: CHRONICLE study results.真实世界中重度哮喘生物制剂的应用和使用坚持度因生物制剂而异:CHRONICLE 研究结果。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2023 Nov;131(5):598-605.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2023.07.017. Epub 2023 Jul 26.
2
Biologic use and outcomes among adults with severe asthma treated by US subspecialists.美国专科医生治疗的重度哮喘成年患者的生物制剂使用情况及治疗结果。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2022 Oct;129(4):467-474.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2022.06.012. Epub 2022 Jun 19.
3
Biologic and maintenance systemic corticosteroid therapy among US subspecialist-treated patients with severe asthma.美国哮喘专科治疗患者中重度哮喘的生物制剂和维持性全身皮质类固醇治疗。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2020 Sep;125(3):294-303.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2020.04.004. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
4
Lower Use of Biologics for the Treatment of Asthma in Publicly Insured Individuals.公众保险人群中生物制剂治疗哮喘的使用率较低。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2021 Nov;9(11):3969-3976. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2021.01.039. Epub 2021 Feb 6.
5
Comparative Impact of Asthma Biologics: A Nationwide US Claim-Based Analysis.哮喘生物制剂的比较影响:一项基于全美索赔数据的分析。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2024 Jun;12(6):1558-1567. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2024.02.029. Epub 2024 Feb 27.
6
Impact of benralizumab on asthma exacerbation-related medical healthcare resource utilization and medical costs: results from the ZEPHYR 2 study.倍利珠单抗对哮喘加重相关医疗保健资源利用和医疗费用的影响:ZEPHYR 2研究结果
J Med Econ. 2023 Jan-Dec;26(1):954-962. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2023.2236867.
7
Severe asthma exacerbations in the United States:: Incidence, characteristics, predictors, and effects of biologic treatments.美国严重哮喘恶化情况:发生率、特征、预测因素和生物治疗的效果。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2021 Nov;127(5):579-587.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2021.07.010. Epub 2021 Jul 15.
8
Adherence to Asthma Biologics: Implications for Patient Selection, Step Therapy, and Outcomes.哮喘生物制剂的依从性:对患者选择、阶梯治疗和结局的影响。
Chest. 2021 Mar;159(3):924-932. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.10.050. Epub 2020 Oct 24.
9
Global Variability in Administrative Approval Prescription Criteria for Biologic Therapy in Severe Asthma.全球变异性:严重哮喘生物治疗的行政审批处方标准
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2022 May;10(5):1202-1216.e23. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2021.12.027. Epub 2022 Jan 3.
10
Clinical and economic burden of severe asthma among US patients treated with biologic therapies.美国接受生物疗法治疗的重度哮喘患者的临床和经济负担。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2021 Sep;127(3):318-325.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2021.03.015. Epub 2021 Mar 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Preferences for Biologic Treatments: A Discrete Choice Experiment Survey of Canadians with Severe Asthma.生物治疗的偏好:一项针对加拿大重度哮喘患者的离散选择实验调查
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2025 May 22;19:1509-1522. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S512755. eCollection 2025.
2
The Impact of Biological Therapies and the Significance of Their Adherence on Asthma Outcomes in a Single Tertiary Asthma Center.单一三级哮喘中心生物疗法的影响及其依从性对哮喘结局的意义。
J Asthma Allergy. 2025 May 5;18:695-704. doi: 10.2147/JAA.S522414. eCollection 2025.
3
Real-World Evidence of Administration of Biologic Agents in Patients with Severe Asthma: An Analysis of the Respiratory Department of University Hospital of Patras Asthma Registry.
重症哮喘患者使用生物制剂的真实世界证据:对帕特雷大学医院哮喘登记处呼吸科的分析
J Clin Med. 2025 Mar 22;14(7):2174. doi: 10.3390/jcm14072174.
4
Benralizumab Outcomes in Patients with Severe Eosinophilic Asthma Treated in Real-Life Settings: Results of the BREEZE Study in 5 Countries From Central Eastern Europe and Baltics.在现实环境中治疗的重度嗜酸性粒细胞性哮喘患者中使用贝那利珠单抗的疗效:中东欧和波罗的海5国的BREEZE研究结果
J Asthma Allergy. 2025 Feb 17;18:195-210. doi: 10.2147/JAA.S503048. eCollection 2025.
5
Pharmacokinetics of Depemokimab Delivered by Safety Syringe Device or Autoinjector in Healthy Adults: A Phase 1, Single-Dose Study.安全注射器装置或自动注射器给药的地培莫单抗在健康成年人中的药代动力学:一项1期单剂量研究。
Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev. 2025 Mar;14(3):190-199. doi: 10.1002/cpdd.1506. Epub 2025 Jan 28.