• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用StreamLight软件进行单步经上皮准分子原位角膜磨镶术(Trans-PRK)并对比有无上皮厚度定制的6个月随访研究。

A 6-Month Follow-Up Comparative Study of Single-Step Transepithelial Photorefractive Keratectomy (Trans-PRK) Using the StreamLight Software with and without Epithelial Thickness Customization.

作者信息

Aramberri Jaime, Lauzirika Gorka, Illarramendi Igor, Mendicute Javier

机构信息

Anterior Segment Department, Miranza Begitek, Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain.

Anterior Segment Department, Miranza Ókular, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain.

出版信息

Clin Ophthalmol. 2024 Oct 9;18:2831-2841. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S487627. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.2147/OPTH.S487627
PMID:39398468
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11471074/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare corneal aberrometry, densitometry, and refractive outcomes of single-step Transepithelial Photorefractive Keratectomy (Trans-PRK) with and without epithelial thickness customization.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a prospective, interventional, randomized controlled study. Patients undergoing Trans-PRK using the WaveLight EX500 laser with StreamLight software (Alcon Laboratories, Forth Worth, TX, USA) were randomly assigned to control (55 µm standard epithelial thickness) or customized (thinnest point of epithelial thickness for each patient) groups. MS-39 (CSO, Italy) anterior segment optical coherence tomography was used to measure the epithelial thickness. Inclusion criteria were spherical equivalent <6 diopters (D), astigmatism <4D, and CDVA 20/25 or better. The assessments were at baseline and 6 months post-op: visual acuity, refraction, aberrometry, and corneal densitometry.

RESULTS

108 eyes were enrolled, [control group (n=56) and customized group (n=52)]. Mean epithelial ablation thickness in the customized group was 54.81±3.56µm (p=0.470 vs control group). Both groups experienced significant postoperative increases in higher-order aberrations (HOA) and spherical aberrations, with no significant intergroup differences. Mean HOA RMS (µm) of the frontal cornea and total cornea increased by 0.27, and 0.29, respectively, in the control group, and 0.26 and 0.28, respectively, in the customized group (p<0.001 for all). Mean change in spherical aberrations in the frontal cornea and total cornea was 0.23µm (p<0.001) and 0.25µm (p<0.001), in the control group, and 0.19µm (p<0.001) and 0.20µm (p<0.001), in the customized group. Mean corneal densitometry in anterior cornea decreased by 0.63GSU (p=0.021) and 1.18GSU (p<0.001) in the control and customized groups. In the posterior cornea, it increased by 1.67GSU (p=0.004) and 0.38GSU (p=0.006).

CONCLUSION

No significant differences in refractive and aberrometry outcomes between control and customized Trans-PRK groups, with corneal densitometry changes not affecting visual acuity.

摘要

目的

比较单步经上皮光屈光性角膜切削术(Trans-PRK)在有无上皮厚度个体化定制情况下的角膜像差测量、密度测量及屈光结果。

患者与方法

这是一项前瞻性、干预性、随机对照研究。使用配备StreamLight软件的威视EX500激光(爱尔康实验室,美国得克萨斯州沃思堡)进行Trans-PRK的患者被随机分为对照组(标准上皮厚度55µm)或个体化定制组(每位患者上皮厚度最薄处)。采用MS-39(意大利CSO)眼前节光学相干断层扫描测量上皮厚度。纳入标准为等效球镜度<6屈光度(D)、散光<4D且矫正远视力(CDVA)为20/25或更佳。评估在基线及术后6个月进行:视力、验光、像差测量及角膜密度测量。

结果

共纳入108只眼,[对照组(n = 56)和个体化定制组(n = 52)]。个体化定制组的平均上皮切削厚度为54.81±3.56µm(与对照组相比,p = 0.470)。两组术后高阶像差(HOA)和球差均显著增加,组间无显著差异。对照组角膜前表面和全角膜的平均HOA均方根(µm)分别增加0.27和0.29,个体化定制组分别增加0.26和0.28(所有p<0.001)。对照组角膜前表面和全角膜的球差平均变化分别为0.23µm(p<0.001)和0.25µm(p<0.001),个体化定制组分别为0.19µm(p<0.001)和0.20µm(p<0.001)。对照组和个体化定制组角膜前表面的平均角膜密度测量值分别降低0.63GSU(p = 0.021)和1.18GSU(p<0.001)。在角膜后表面,其分别增加1.67GSU(p = 0.004)和0.38GSU(p = 0.006)。

结论

对照组和个体化定制Trans-PRK组在屈光和像差测量结果上无显著差异,角膜密度测量变化不影响视力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3558/11471074/2b77801f2e46/OPTH-18-2831-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3558/11471074/8e3739e9ca27/OPTH-18-2831-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3558/11471074/e98eac76c0a5/OPTH-18-2831-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3558/11471074/2b77801f2e46/OPTH-18-2831-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3558/11471074/8e3739e9ca27/OPTH-18-2831-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3558/11471074/e98eac76c0a5/OPTH-18-2831-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3558/11471074/2b77801f2e46/OPTH-18-2831-g0003.jpg

相似文献

1
A 6-Month Follow-Up Comparative Study of Single-Step Transepithelial Photorefractive Keratectomy (Trans-PRK) Using the StreamLight Software with and without Epithelial Thickness Customization.使用StreamLight软件进行单步经上皮准分子原位角膜磨镶术(Trans-PRK)并对比有无上皮厚度定制的6个月随访研究。
Clin Ophthalmol. 2024 Oct 9;18:2831-2841. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S487627. eCollection 2024.
2
Comparison between a new transepithelial PRK vs. conventional alcohol-assisted PRK: Corneal densitometry and aberrometry study.新型经上皮准分子原位角膜磨镶术与传统酒精辅助准分子原位角膜磨镶术的比较:角膜密度测定和像差测量研究
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2025 Mar;35(2):474-481. doi: 10.1177/11206721241267360. Epub 2024 Aug 15.
3
Twelve-month outcomes of single-step transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy for moderate hyperopia and hyperopic astigmatism.单步经上皮光屈光性角膜切削术治疗中度远视和远视散光的12个月疗效
Eye Vis (Lond). 2023 Mar 1;10(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s40662-023-00327-4.
4
Past and present of corneal refractive surgery: a retrospective study of long-term results after photorefractive keratectomy and a prospective study of refractive lenticule extraction.角膜屈光手术的过去和现在:准分子激光角膜切削术长期疗效的回顾性研究和准分子激光透镜切除术的前瞻性研究。
Acta Ophthalmol. 2014 Mar;92 Thesis 2:1-21. doi: 10.1111/aos.12385.
5
Investigation of corneal epithelial thickness and irregularity by optical coherence tomography after transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy.光学相干断层扫描对经上皮准分子激光角膜切削术后角膜上皮厚度及不规则性的研究。
Clin Exp Optom. 2024 Jan;107(1):23-31. doi: 10.1080/08164622.2023.2197107. Epub 2023 Apr 20.
6
Zyoptix wavefront-guided versus standard photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) in low and moderate myopia: randomized controlled 6-month study.Zyoptix波前引导与标准准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术(PRK)治疗轻中度近视:随机对照6个月研究。
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2006 Mar-Apr;16(2):219-28. doi: 10.1177/112067210601600205.
7
Comparison of Corneal Wavefront-optimized and Wavefront-guided Alcohol-assisted Photorefractive Keratectomy Using Schwind Amaris 750S Laser for Myopia.使用施温德阿玛里斯750S激光进行角膜波前优化与波前引导的酒精辅助准分子原位角膜磨镶术治疗近视的比较。
Korean J Ophthalmol. 2020 Jun;34(3):210-218. doi: 10.3341/kjo.2019.0087.
8
Retrospective Analysis of the Post-Operative Changes in Higher-Order Aberrations: A Comparison of the WaveLight EX500 to the VISX S4 Laser in Refractive Surgery.高阶像差术后变化的回顾性分析:屈光手术中WaveLight EX500与VISX S4激光的比较
Mil Med. 2017 Nov;182(11):e2061-e2065. doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-17-00159.
9
Longitudinal evaluation of posterior corneal elevation after laser refractive surgery using swept-source optical coherence tomography.应用扫频源光学相干断层扫描仪对激光屈光手术后后角膜隆起的纵向评估。
Ophthalmology. 2015 Apr;122(4):687-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.10.011. Epub 2014 Dec 6.
10
To Investigate the Changes in Corneal Curvature and Its Correlation with Corneal Epithelial Remodeling After Trans-PRK and FS-LASIK.研究经 Trans-PRK 和 FS-LASIK 术后角膜曲率的变化及其与角膜上皮重塑的相关性。
Curr Eye Res. 2024 Oct;49(10):1061-1067. doi: 10.1080/02713683.2024.2361728. Epub 2024 Jun 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Corneal optical density: Structural basis, measurements, influencing factors, and roles in refractive surgery.角膜光学密度:结构基础、测量方法、影响因素及在屈光手术中的作用。
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023 Apr 6;11:1144455. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1144455. eCollection 2023.
2
Transepithelial Photorefractive Keratectomy Compared to Conventional Photorefractive Keratectomy: A Meta-Analysis.经上皮光性角膜切削术与传统光性角膜切削术的比较:一项荟萃分析。
J Ophthalmol. 2022 Aug 23;2022:3022672. doi: 10.1155/2022/3022672. eCollection 2022.
3
Transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy: a prospective randomized comparative study between the two-step and the single-step techniques.
经上皮准分子激光角膜切削术:两步法与一步法的前瞻性随机对照研究。
Eye (Lond). 2023 Jun;37(8):1545-1552. doi: 10.1038/s41433-022-02174-4. Epub 2022 Jul 21.
4
Epithelial thickness mapping for corneal refractive surgery.角膜屈光手术的上皮厚度测绘。
Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2022 Jul 1;33(4):258-268. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000867.
5
Factors affecting single-step transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy outcome in the treatment of mild, moderate, and high myopia: a cohort study.影响单步经上皮光性角膜切削术治疗轻度、中度和高度近视效果的因素:一项队列研究
Int J Ophthalmol. 2022 May 18;15(5):786-792. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2022.05.15. eCollection 2022.
6
Determining the Utility of Epithelial Thickness Mapping in Refractive Surgery Evaluations.确定上皮厚度图在屈光手术评估中的效用。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2022 Aug;240:125-134. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2022.02.021. Epub 2022 Mar 3.
7
Comparison of clinical outcomes of LASIK, Trans-PRK, and SMILE for correction of myopia.LASIK、Trans-PRK 和 SMILE 治疗近视的临床疗效比较。
J Chin Med Assoc. 2022 Feb 1;85(2):145-151. doi: 10.1097/JCMA.0000000000000674.
8
Corneal haze post photorefractive keratectomy.准分子激光角膜切削术后角膜混浊。
J Fr Ophtalmol. 2021 Nov;44(9):1425-1438. doi: 10.1016/j.jfo.2021.05.006. Epub 2021 Sep 17.
9
Early clinical outcomes and comparison between trans-PRK and PRK, regarding refractive outcome, wound healing, pain intensity and visual recovery time in a real-world setup.在真实环境中,关于屈光结果、伤口愈合、疼痛强度和视觉恢复时间,比较经上皮准分子激光角膜切削术(trans-PRK)和准分子激光角膜切削术(PRK)的早期临床结果。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2021 Apr 16;21(1):181. doi: 10.1186/s12886-021-01941-3.
10
Evaluation of corneal structures in myopic eyes more than twenty-two years after photorefractive keratectomy.准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术后二十二年以上近视眼的角膜结构评估
J Biophotonics. 2020 Oct;13(10):e202000138. doi: 10.1002/jbio.202000138. Epub 2020 Aug 7.