From the Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands (B.A.T.v.d.B., R.S.P., M.R.M.); Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (B.A.T.v.d.B., R.S.P., M.R.M.); Department of Surgical Oncology, OLVG Hospital, Oost, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (B.A.T.v.d.B.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, OLVG Hospital, Oost, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (R.S.P.), Department of Medical Physics and Radiation Protection, Haaglanden MC, The Hague, the Netherlands (H. Keijzers); and Department of Surgical Oncology, Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, the Netherlands (P.M.v.d.T.).
Radiol Imaging Cancer. 2024 Nov;6(6):e240068. doi: 10.1148/rycan.240068.
Purpose To further define anatomic criteria for resection and ablation using an expert panel-based three-dimensional liver model to objectively predict local treatment recommendations for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). Materials and Methods This study analyzed data from participants with small CRLM (≤3 cm) considered suitable for resection, thermal ablation, or irreversible electroporation (IRE), according to a multidisciplinary expert panel, who were included in two prospective multicenter trials (COLLISION [NCT03088150] and COLDFIRE-2 [NCT02082782]) between August 2017 and June 2022. Ten randomly selected participants were used to standardize the model's Couinaud segments. CRLM coordinates were measured and plotted in the model as color-coded lesions according to the treatment recommendations. Statistical validation was achieved through leave-one-out cross-validation. Results A total of 611 CRLM in 202 participants (mean age, 63 [range, 29-87] years; 138 male and 64 female) were included. Superficially located CRLM were considered suitable for resection, whereas more deep-seated CRLM were preferably ablated, with the transition zone at a subsurface depth of 3 cm. Ninety-three percent (25 of 27) of perihilar CRLM treated with IRE were at least partially located within 1 cm from the portal triad. Use of the model correctly predicted the preferred treatment in 313 of 424 CRLM (73.8%). Conclusion The results suggest that CRLM can be defined as superficial (preferably resected) and deep-seated (preferably ablated) if the tumor center is within versus beyond 3 cm from the liver surface, respectively, and as perihilar if the tumor margins extend to within 1 cm from the portal triad. Ablation Techniques, CT, MRI, Liver, Abdomen/GI, Metastases, Oncology © RSNA, 2024.
目的 使用基于专家小组的三维肝脏模型进一步定义肝切除和消融的解剖学标准,客观预测结直肠癌肝转移(CRLM)的局部治疗建议。
材料与方法 本研究分析了根据多学科专家小组认为适合切除、热消融或不可逆电穿孔(IRE)的小 CRLM(≤3cm)参与者的数据,这些参与者来自两项前瞻性多中心试验(COLLISION[NCT03088150]和 COLDFIRE-2[NCT02082782]),这些试验于 2017 年 8 月至 2022 年 6 月进行。采用 10 名随机选择的参与者对模型的 Couinaud 节段进行标准化。根据治疗建议,将 CRLM 坐标测量并绘制在模型中,以彩色编码病变表示。通过留一法交叉验证实现统计验证。
结果 共纳入 202 名参与者的 611 个 CRLM(平均年龄 63[范围 29-87]岁;138 名男性和 64 名女性)。位于肝脏表面浅层的 CRLM 被认为适合切除,而位于肝脏深处的 CRLM 则更适合消融,过渡区位于 3cm 以下的亚表面深度。93%(25/27)的采用 IRE 治疗的肝门周围 CRLM 至少有一部分位于门静脉三联体 1cm 以内。模型正确预测了 424 个 CRLM 中的 313 个(73.8%)的首选治疗方法。
结论 结果表明,如果肿瘤中心位于肝脏表面 3cm 以内(首选切除)和以外(首选消融),则可以将 CRLM 定义为表浅(首选切除)和深部(首选消融);如果肿瘤边缘延伸至门静脉三联体 1cm 以内,则可定义为肝门周围。
消融技术、CT、MRI、肝脏、腹部/胃肠道、转移瘤、肿瘤学