Cross Dori A, Weiner Josh, Olson Andrew P J
Division of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Department of Medicine, Division of Hospital Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
J Hosp Med. 2025 Apr;20(4):352-359. doi: 10.1002/jhm.13529. Epub 2024 Oct 13.
Attending physicians in academic hospitals work in supervisory team structures with medical residents to provide patient care. How attendings utilize the electronic health record (EHR) to support learning through supervision is not well understood.
To compare EHR behavior on teaching versus direct care, including evidence of supervisory calibration to learners.
Cross-sectional study analysis of EHR metadata from 1721 shifts of hospital medicine faculty at a large, urban academic medical center, January to June 2022. Measures included total EHR time per shift, EHR time outside shift, and time spent on: note-writing, note review/attestation, order entry, and other clinical review. We assessed within physician differences across these service types and used multilevel modeling to determine whether these behaviors varied with resident physicians' experience, accounting for physician-specific signature behavior patterns.
Attendings spent substantially less time in the EHR while on teaching service than on direct service (129 vs. 240 min; p < .001) and apportioned their work differently throughout the day. Physicians were less behaviorally consistent and varied more than their peers when on teaching service. Attendings calibrated their supervision to learners. Attendings logged 12.7% less EHR time when paired with more senior residents than postgraduate year 2 (PGY2) residents (137 vs. 120 min, p = .002). PGY1 presence was also associated with reduced EHR time, suggesting some delegation of supervision to senior trainees.
EHR behaviors on teaching service are highly variable and differ substantially from direct care; a lack of consistency suggests important opportunities to establish best practices for EHR-based supervision and create an effective clinical learning environment.
学术医院的主治医师与住院医师在监督团队结构中共同为患者提供护理。目前对于主治医师如何利用电子健康记录(EHR)通过监督来支持学习,我们还了解得不够充分。
比较教学服务与直接护理中的电子健康记录行为,包括对学习者监督校准的证据。
对2022年1月至6月在一家大型城市学术医疗中心的1721个医院内科教员班次的电子健康记录元数据进行横断面研究分析。测量指标包括每班的电子健康记录总时长、班外电子健康记录时长,以及花在以下方面的时间:记录笔记、笔记审核/认证、医嘱录入和其他临床审核。我们评估了这些服务类型中医生内部的差异,并使用多层次模型来确定这些行为是否因住院医师的经验而有所不同,同时考虑医生特定的签名行为模式。
在教学服务期间,主治医师在电子健康记录上花费的时间比直接服务时少得多(129分钟对240分钟;p < 0.001),并且在一天中分配工作的方式也有所不同。在教学服务时,医生的行为一致性较差,与同行相比差异更大。主治医师会根据学习者的情况校准他们的监督。与二年级住院医师(PGY2)相比,与高年级住院医师配对时,主治医师记录的电子健康记录时间少12.7%(137分钟对120分钟,p = 0.002)。PGY1的在场也与电子健康记录时间减少有关,这表明一些监督工作被委托给了高年级实习生。
教学服务中的电子健康记录行为高度可变,与直接护理有很大不同;缺乏一致性表明有重要机会建立基于电子健康记录的监督最佳实践,并创造一个有效的临床学习环境。